Government · head to head
Clariti vs DTiQ

Clariti
Government
Permitting, licensing and land management for local government, built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Clariti salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.; DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- They diverge on capability: Clariti covers Permitting workflows, DTiQ covers SmartAudit.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Clariti and DTiQ actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Clariti
- Permitting workflows
- Business licensing
- Inspections
- Code enforcement
- Public portal
- Salesforce platform tooling
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Clariti
- A city already standardised on Salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platformnot DTiQ
- An agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stallednot DTiQ
- A county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcementnot DTiQ
- An IT department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor ticketsnot DTiQ
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot Clariti
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot Clariti
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot Clariti
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot Clariti
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Clariti
- Salesforce platform licences sit underneath the subscription and are not always visible in the initial quote, so the fully loaded cost can be materially higher than the comparison against Accela or Tyler suggests.
- Building on Salesforce means the agency inherits Salesforce release cycles and pricing changes, neither of which Clariti controls.
- It has far less accumulated edge case handling than the incumbents, so unusual fee schedules, historic district rules or state mandated reporting can become configuration projects.
- Professional services dominate the first year cost, as with every permitting implementation, and agencies that budget only for licence are the ones whose projects stall.
- The install base is smaller than Accela or Tyler, so there are fewer peer agencies to call for reference and fewer trained implementation consultants in the market.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Pricing, plan by plan
Clariti
On request- Clariti$undefined/year
- Quoted by agency size and module scope
- Salesforce platform licences are a separate cost underneath the subscription
- Implementation and configuration services typically exceed first year licence cost
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Which should you pick?
Choose Clariti if
- You need permitting workflows.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want business licensing.
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Questions people ask
- Is Clariti or DTiQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. Clariti starts at On request and DTiQ at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Clariti or DTiQ?
- Clariti starts at On request and DTiQ at On request.
- Does Clariti or DTiQ run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Clariti best used for?
- Clariti is most often used for a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform, an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled, a county needing configurable workflows across permits, licensing and code enforcement, an it department that wants to configure and report on its own permitting workflows without vendor tickets. Of those, a city already standardised on salesforce that wants permitting inside the same platform and an agency replacing a legacy permitting system whose vendor was acquired and whose roadmap stalled are not what DTiQ is typically brought in for.
- What can Clariti do that DTiQ cannot?
- Clariti covers Permitting workflows, Business licensing, Inspections, Code enforcement. DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Clariti: Do we need Salesforce licences as well?
Yes. Clariti runs on the Salesforce platform, and those licences are a separate line item. Insist on a fully loaded quote.
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
Clariti: How does it compare with Accela?
Accela has far deeper accumulated handling of edge cases. Clariti offers a more modern and configurable platform, at the price of Salesforce underneath.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
Clariti: Can we see what other agencies paid?
Yes. Permitting contracts are public records and award notices routinely list implementation and annual subscription values.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
Clariti: Is it suitable for a small town?
Usually not. The platform cost and implementation effort suit mid sized and larger agencies.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Clariti vs Accela
- Clariti vs CityView
- Clariti vs Tyler Technologies
- Clariti vs GovPilot
- Clariti vs mySidewalk
- Clariti vs NEOGOV
- Clariti vs ArchiveSocial
- Clariti vs Bonfire
- Clariti vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- Clariti vs Periscope Holdings
- Clariti vs Zencity
- Clariti vs OpenGov
- Clariti vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Clariti vs NextRequest
- Clariti vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Clariti vs VUEWorks
- Clariti vs American Legal Publishing
- Clariti vs Rhombus Systems
- Clariti vs Salient CompleteView
- Clariti vs Spot AI
- Clariti vs Envysion
- Clariti vs March Networks
- Clariti vs Eagle Eye Networks
- Clariti vs Camio
- Clariti vs BigID
- Clariti vs NICE Actimize
- Clariti vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Clariti vs Proofpoint
- Clariti vs Genetec Security Center
- Clariti vs Endor Labs
- Clariti vs Enpass
- Clariti vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- Clariti vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- Clariti vs Fortinet FortiGate
- Clariti vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs Accela
- DTiQ vs CityView
- DTiQ vs Tyler Technologies
- DTiQ vs GovPilot
- DTiQ vs mySidewalk
- DTiQ vs NEOGOV
- DTiQ vs ArchiveSocial
- DTiQ vs Bonfire
- DTiQ vs CivicPlus Asset Management
- DTiQ vs Periscope Holdings
- DTiQ vs Zencity
- DTiQ vs OpenGov
- DTiQ vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- DTiQ vs NextRequest
- DTiQ vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- DTiQ vs VUEWorks
- DTiQ vs American Legal Publishing
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
