Government · head to head
ArchiveSocial vs DTiQ

ArchiveSocial
Government
Social media archiving that captures public agency accounts as legally defensible open records
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

DTiQ
Cybersecurity
Managed video loss prevention with human auditors for restaurants, convenience stores and retail
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArchiveSocial coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.; DTiQ you are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- They diverge on capability: ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, DTiQ covers SmartAudit.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArchiveSocial and DTiQ actually diverge.
| Attribute | ArchiveSocial | DTiQ |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArchiveSocial
- Continuous capture
- Deletion and edit capture
- Authenticated records
- Records request search
- Litigation hold export
- Multi platform coverage
Only in DTiQ
- SmartAudit
- POS transaction linking
- 360iQ platform
- Exception alerting
- Drive-through timing
- Food safety and compliance checks
- Managed installation
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArchiveSocial
- A city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liabilitynot DTiQ
- A police department that must produce social media records under an open records requestnot DTiQ
- An agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshotsnot DTiQ
- A communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archivingnot DTiQ
DTiQ
- A multi-unit quick service franchisee who has no one available to review video across fifteen storesnot ArchiveSocial
- A convenience store chain investigating till fraud by matching voids to what actually happened at the counternot ArchiveSocial
- An operator enforcing drive-through service time standards across locations from evidence rather than anecdotenot ArchiveSocial
- A brand auditing food safety and cleanliness compliance at franchise sites without sending a field managernot ArchiveSocial
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArchiveSocial
- Coverage depends entirely on third party platform APIs, so when a network restricts or reprices its API the archive's completeness changes for reasons the vendor does not control.
- Pricing scales with the number of archived accounts, so an agency where every department runs its own page pays repeatedly for the same compliance obligation.
- It archives rather than governs, so it will faithfully preserve a policy violation without preventing it, and agencies still need social media policy and training.
- Since the 2021 CivicPlus acquisition the product is part of a municipal suite, so buyers avoiding that vendor for other reasons are still buying from them.
- The value is entirely insurance shaped, which makes it a perennial target during budget cuts right up until the first records request it would have answered.
DTiQ
- You are buying labour, so the cost per site is far higher than a self-service video licence and it does not fall as camera prices do.
- Audits are sampled, not continuous, so a problem outside the reviewed window is invisible and the score is a statistical impression rather than a complete record.
- Nothing is published on price and the commercial shape is a multi-year managed service agreement, which is harder to exit than a software subscription and typically involves bundled hardware you do not own.
- Ownership changed in a $200 million Digital Alpha led investment tied to a Cisco Meraki partnership, so the hardware and network roadmap may shift under an existing estate.
- It is built around restaurant, convenience and retail operating models, so an organisation outside those verticals gets a generic video product and pays for an audit methodology that does not fit its work.
Pricing, plan by plan
ArchiveSocial
On request- ArchiveSocial$undefined/year
- Quoted annually, typically scaled by number of archived accounts
- Additional accounts and platforms increase the subscription
- Bundled pricing common for agencies already buying CivicPlus products
DTiQ
On request- DTiQ managed service$undefined/month
- Priced per location as a managed service, not per camera
- Audit frequency and scope determine the rate
- Hardware and installation bundled into the service agreement
Which should you pick?
Choose ArchiveSocial if
- You need continuous capture.
- You also want deletion and edit capture.
Choose DTiQ if
- You need smartaudit.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want pos transaction linking.
Questions people ask
- Is ArchiveSocial or DTiQ better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArchiveSocial starts at On request and DTiQ at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArchiveSocial or DTiQ?
- ArchiveSocial starts at On request and DTiQ at On request.
- Does ArchiveSocial or DTiQ run on more platforms?
- ArchiveSocial runs on Web. DTiQ runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is ArchiveSocial best used for?
- ArchiveSocial is most often used for a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability, a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request, an agency under litigation hold needing authenticated social media evidence rather than screenshots, a communications team operating many accounts across departments with no consistent archiving. Of those, a city whose legal department has flagged deleted social media comments as a records liability and a police department that must produce social media records under an open records request are not what DTiQ is typically brought in for.
- What can ArchiveSocial do that DTiQ cannot?
- ArchiveSocial covers Continuous capture, Deletion and edit capture, Authenticated records, Records request search. DTiQ covers SmartAudit, POS transaction linking, 360iQ platform, Exception alerting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArchiveSocial: Why not just export data from the platforms?
Platform exports do not reliably capture deleted or edited content and carry no chain of custody, which is what makes an archive usable as evidence.
DTiQ: Is DTiQ a video management system?
Not primarily. It is a managed service where human auditors review your footage and deliver scored reports. The platform exists to support that service.
ArchiveSocial: Are public comments on our posts records?
In many United States jurisdictions yes, and deleted comments have been the subject of litigation against agencies.
DTiQ: How is it priced?
Per location as a managed service, based on audit scope and frequency, with hardware and installation bundled. Nothing is published.
ArchiveSocial: Who owns ArchiveSocial?
CivicPlus, which acquired it in 2021 and sells it alongside its municipal website and communications products.
DTiQ: Who owns DTiQ?
Digital Alpha holds a majority stake following a $200 million investment that bought out Bain Capital, BV Investment Partners and others, alongside a Cisco Meraki partnership.
ArchiveSocial: How is it priced?
By archived accounts, quoted rather than published. Comparable agency contracts are public records.
DTiQ: Does it integrate with my POS?
Yes, with major restaurant and convenience store point of sale systems, which is what allows transaction exceptions to be replayed on video.
Related pages
More on ArchiveSocial
Other head to heads
- ArchiveSocial vs NextRequest
- ArchiveSocial vs Granicus
- ArchiveSocial vs Zencity
- ArchiveSocial vs Bonfire
- ArchiveSocial vs NEOGOV
- ArchiveSocial vs AWS GovCloud
- ArchiveSocial vs Clariti
- ArchiveSocial vs GovPilot
- ArchiveSocial vs mySidewalk
- ArchiveSocial vs Periscope Holdings
- ArchiveSocial vs Axon Records
- ArchiveSocial vs DataSF
- ArchiveSocial vs Google Cloud for Government
- ArchiveSocial vs iCompass
- ArchiveSocial vs Mapbox Government
- ArchiveSocial vs GovQA
- ArchiveSocial vs Rhombus Systems
- ArchiveSocial vs Salient CompleteView
- ArchiveSocial vs Spot AI
- ArchiveSocial vs Envysion
- ArchiveSocial vs March Networks
- ArchiveSocial vs Eagle Eye Networks
- ArchiveSocial vs Camio
- ArchiveSocial vs BigID
- ArchiveSocial vs NICE Actimize
- ArchiveSocial vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- ArchiveSocial vs Proofpoint
- ArchiveSocial vs Genetec Security Center
- ArchiveSocial vs Endor Labs
- ArchiveSocial vs Enpass
- ArchiveSocial vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- ArchiveSocial vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- ArchiveSocial vs Fortinet FortiGate
- ArchiveSocial vs HID Global
- DTiQ vs NextRequest
- DTiQ vs Granicus
- DTiQ vs Zencity
- DTiQ vs Bonfire
- DTiQ vs NEOGOV
- DTiQ vs AWS GovCloud
- DTiQ vs Clariti
- DTiQ vs GovPilot
- DTiQ vs mySidewalk
- DTiQ vs Periscope Holdings
- DTiQ vs Axon Records
- DTiQ vs DataSF
- DTiQ vs Google Cloud for Government
- DTiQ vs iCompass
- DTiQ vs Mapbox Government
- DTiQ vs GovQA
- DTiQ vs Rhombus Systems
- DTiQ vs Salient CompleteView
- DTiQ vs Spot AI
- DTiQ vs Envysion
- DTiQ vs March Networks
- DTiQ vs Eagle Eye Networks
- DTiQ vs Camio
- DTiQ vs BigID
- DTiQ vs NICE Actimize
- DTiQ vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- DTiQ vs Proofpoint
- DTiQ vs Genetec Security Center
- DTiQ vs Endor Labs
- DTiQ vs Enpass
- DTiQ vs Entrust Identity as a Service
- DTiQ vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- DTiQ vs Fortinet FortiGate
- DTiQ vs HID Global
