Nonprofits · head to head
Bonterra vs Glue Up

Bonterra
Nonprofits
The rolled-up parent of EveryAction, Apricot, CyberGrants and Network for Good, sold as three product lines
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Glue Up
Nonprofits
Membership, events and engagement software with strong Asia-Pacific presence
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Bonterra the three lines are separately acquired codebases, so buying two of them gives you two logins, two support queues and a connector rather than one system.; Glue Up pricing is not published, and quotes vary substantially by region, which makes budgeting harder than with the published North American tools
- They diverge on capability: Bonterra covers Case management, Glue Up covers Event management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Bonterra and Glue Up actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Nonprofits).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Bonterra
- Case management
- Fundraising and engagement
- Corporate grantmaking
- Employee giving and volunteering
- Outcomes reporting
- Impact data connectors
Only in Glue Up
- Event management
- Membership management
- Member mobile app
- Email campaigns
- Integrated CRM
- Regional payments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Bonterra
- A human services agency that must report participant outcomes to a government funder and cannot do it in a donor CRMnot Glue Up
- A national advocacy organisation needing high-volume email, action alerts and distributed organising in one donor recordnot Glue Up
- A large employer running a global employee match and grant disbursement programme across many countriesnot Glue Up
- A nonprofit consolidating a legacy Salsa or ETO deployment onto a supported product within the same vendornot Glue Up
Glue Up
- Chambers of commerce and professional bodies operating across Asia-Pacificnot Bonterra
- Associations whose events are the core of member value rather than an add-onnot Bonterra
- Organisations wanting a branded member app rather than a web portalnot Bonterra
- Bodies needing local payment methods and regional data residencynot Bonterra
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Bonterra
- The three lines are separately acquired codebases, so buying two of them gives you two logins, two support queues and a connector rather than one system.
- Legacy products absorbed in the roll-up, notably ETO and older Salsa modules, receive limited development while investment goes to flagship products, leaving those customers on a slowly ageing platform.
- No pricing is published for any line, and quotes vary widely by contact count and negotiation, so benchmarking against competitors requires a full sales cycle.
- Private equity ownership has produced repeated renewal price increases reported by customers, and the portfolio structure reduces the credibility of threatening to switch since several obvious alternatives are also Bonterra products.
- Implementation for Case Management is a configuration project measured in months, and agencies routinely underestimate the internal staff time required to define forms and outcome measures.
Glue Up
- Pricing is not published, and quotes vary substantially by region, which makes budgeting harder than with the published North American tools
- Membership management is less deep than the dedicated association management systems, reflecting its event-management origins
- Smaller North American and European ecosystem, so integrations and local references are thinner outside Asia
- Fundraising and donor management are weak, so charities whose main activity is giving should look elsewhere
- The breadth means individual modules are good rather than excellent when compared against specialist tools
Pricing, plan by plan
Bonterra
On request- Bonterra Fundraising and Engagement$undefined/year
- Donor CRM and email
- Advocacy and organising tools
- Priced by contact record count
- Bonterra Case Management$undefined/year
- Apricot participant records and assessments
- Outcomes and funder reporting
- Priced by user seats and programme count
- Bonterra Corporate Social Responsibility$undefined/year
- CyberGrants grant disbursement
- Employee giving and volunteering
- Enterprise contract, priced by programme spend
Glue Up
On request- Essentials$undefined/year
- Event management
- Membership
- Email campaigns
- Professional$undefined/year
- All Essentials features
- Member mobile app
- CRM
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Multi-chapter
- API access
- Custom integrations
Which should you pick?
Choose Bonterra if
- You need case management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want fundraising and engagement.
Choose Glue Up if
- You need event management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want membership management.
Questions people ask
- Is Bonterra or Glue Up better?
- Neither clearly leads. Bonterra starts at On request and Glue Up at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Bonterra or Glue Up?
- Bonterra starts at On request and Glue Up at On request.
- Does Bonterra or Glue Up run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Bonterra best used for?
- Bonterra is most often used for a human services agency that must report participant outcomes to a government funder and cannot do it in a donor crm, a national advocacy organisation needing high-volume email, action alerts and distributed organising in one donor record, a large employer running a global employee match and grant disbursement programme across many countries, a nonprofit consolidating a legacy salsa or eto deployment onto a supported product within the same vendor. Of those, a human services agency that must report participant outcomes to a government funder and cannot do it in a donor crm and a national advocacy organisation needing high-volume email, action alerts and distributed organising in one donor record are not what Glue Up is typically brought in for.
- What can Bonterra do that Glue Up cannot?
- Bonterra covers Case management, Fundraising and engagement, Corporate grantmaking, Employee giving and volunteering. Glue Up covers Event management, Membership management, Member mobile app, Email campaigns.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Bonterra: Is Bonterra a single product?
No. It is three product lines built from separately acquired software. You buy one of them, and integration between them is a connector rather than a shared database.
Glue Up: Where is Glue Up strongest?
Asia-Pacific. Local payment methods, WeChat integration, regional data residency and in-region support are things the North American platforms cannot match there.
Bonterra: What happened to EveryAction and Apricot?
They still exist as the underlying products, rebranded as Bonterra Fundraising and Engagement and Bonterra Case Management respectively.
Glue Up: Was it called something else?
Yes, EventBank. The rename to Glue Up reflected the shift from pure event management to membership and engagement.
Bonterra: Does Bonterra publish pricing?
No line has published pricing. Fundraising is generally priced by contact record count, case management by seats and programmes.
Glue Up: What does it cost?
Not published, and it varies by region. Expect an annual contract quoted on member count and modules.
Bonterra: Should a small nonprofit consider Bonterra?
Rarely. The entry price and implementation effort suit organisations with dedicated operations staff; smaller charities are better served by a single-product CRM.
Glue Up: Is the member app real?
Yes, a branded native app rather than a mobile web view. For associations whose members network at events, it is one of the strongest reasons to choose it.
Glue Up: Should a US-only association consider it?
It can, but Wild Apricot and MemberClicks have published pricing, larger local ecosystems and more local references. The Asia-Pacific advantage is the reason to pick Glue Up.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Bonterra vs EveryAction
- Bonterra vs Salsa CRM
- Bonterra vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Bonterra vs NeonCRM
- Bonterra vs Sumac
- Bonterra vs CharityEngine
- Bonterra vs Keela
- Bonterra vs Wild Apricot
- Bonterra vs Submittable
- Bonterra vs CommCare
- Bonterra vs GrantStation
- Bonterra vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Bonterra vs DonorPerfect
- Bonterra vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Bonterra vs Tendenci
- Bonterra vs Handbid
- Bonterra vs Constant Contact
- Bonterra vs Bloomerang
- Bonterra vs GiveSmart
- Bonterra vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Bonterra vs InitLive
- Bonterra vs Kindful
- Bonterra vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- Bonterra vs MemberClicks
- Glue Up vs EveryAction
- Glue Up vs Salsa CRM
- Glue Up vs Blackbaud Raiser's Edge
- Glue Up vs NeonCRM
- Glue Up vs Sumac
- Glue Up vs CharityEngine
- Glue Up vs Keela
- Glue Up vs Wild Apricot
- Glue Up vs Submittable
- Glue Up vs CommCare
- Glue Up vs GrantStation
- Glue Up vs SmartSimple Cloud
- Glue Up vs DonorPerfect
- Glue Up vs Salesforce for Nonprofits
- Glue Up vs Tendenci
- Glue Up vs Handbid
- Glue Up vs Constant Contact
- Glue Up vs Bloomerang
- Glue Up vs GiveSmart
- Glue Up vs Google Nonprofit Tools
- Glue Up vs InitLive
- Glue Up vs Kindful
- Glue Up vs Microsoft Nonprofit Program
- Glue Up vs MemberClicks
