Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Penpot

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Penpot smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Penpot covers Vector editing.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Penpot actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Penpot
- Vector editing
- Interactive prototyping
- Design systems
- Components & libraries
- Real-time collaboration
- SVG support
- CSS Grid & Flexbox
- Code export
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Penpot
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Penpot
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Penpot
Penpot
- UI/UX designnot authentik
- Prototypingnot authentik
- Design systemsnot authentik
- Developer handoffnot authentik
- Open source projectsnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Penpot
- Smaller user base and community compared to Figma means fewer templates and resources
- Self-hosting requires Linux server and Docker knowledge for technical setup
- Real-time collaboration features may have performance issues with very large design files
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Penpot
Free- FreeFree
- Cloud-based design
- Real-time collaboration
- Components and variants
- Unlimited$7/month
- All free features
- Priority support
- Advanced cloud features
- Enterprise$950/month
- Custom enterprise features
- Dedicated support
- Advanced security
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Penpot if
- You need vector editing.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- You also want interactive prototyping.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Penpot better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Penpot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Penpot?
- authentik starts at Free and Penpot at Free.
- Does authentik or Penpot run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Penpot runs on Web, Windows, macOS, Linux.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Penpot is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Penpot cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Penpot covers Vector editing, Interactive prototyping, Design systems, Components & libraries.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Penpot: Is Penpot really free?
Yes. Penpot is completely free with no feature gates. The open-source version can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure for zero cost beyond server expenses.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Penpot: Can I self-host Penpot?
Yes. Penpot can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure with no licensing costs. Organizations with specific privacy or governance needs can run Penpot on their own servers.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Penpot: What are the paid plans if I use Penpot cloud?
Penpot's cloud service offers a free tier, Unlimited plan at $7 per user per month for professionals and medium teams, and Enterprise starting at $950 per month for larger organizations.
SourcePenpot: What platforms does Penpot support?
Penpot runs in the browser, so it works on Windows, Mac, Linux, and any OS with a web browser. No platform-specific downloads required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Bitdefender Total Security
- authentik vs Norton 360
- authentik vs LastPass
- authentik vs Snyk
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Brave Browser
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- authentik vs Kaspersky Total Security
- authentik vs Mullvad VPN
- authentik vs OneTrust
- authentik vs Private Internet Access
- authentik vs Proton Mail
- authentik vs Tuta
- authentik vs Akeyless
- authentik vs Doppler
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs Visual Studio Code
- authentik vs ESLint
- authentik vs pnpm
- authentik vs Turborepo
- authentik vs GitHub Copilot
- authentik vs Keycloak
- authentik vs Rust
- authentik vs CLion
- authentik vs GNAT Pro
- authentik vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- authentik vs GNU Emacs
- authentik vs Keil MDK
- authentik vs Vite
- authentik vs Bazel
- authentik vs CodeSandbox
- authentik vs Eclipse IDE
- authentik vs Moonrepo
- authentik vs Nx Cloud
- Penpot vs 1Password
- Penpot vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Penpot vs Norton 360
- Penpot vs LastPass
- Penpot vs Snyk
- Penpot vs Bitwarden
- Penpot vs Brave Browser
- Penpot vs Clerk
- Penpot vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Penpot vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Penpot vs Mullvad VPN
- Penpot vs OneTrust
- Penpot vs Private Internet Access
- Penpot vs Proton Mail
- Penpot vs Tuta
- Penpot vs Akeyless
- Penpot vs Doppler
- Penpot vs Frontegg
- Penpot vs Visual Studio Code
- Penpot vs ESLint
- Penpot vs pnpm
- Penpot vs Turborepo
- Penpot vs GitHub Copilot
- Penpot vs Keycloak
- Penpot vs Rust
- Penpot vs CLion
- Penpot vs GNAT Pro
- Penpot vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Penpot vs GNU Emacs
- Penpot vs Keil MDK
- Penpot vs Vite
- Penpot vs Bazel
- Penpot vs CodeSandbox
- Penpot vs Eclipse IDE
- Penpot vs Moonrepo
- Penpot vs Nx Cloud

