Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Passbolt

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Passbolt
Cybersecurity
Open-source password manager for teams with self-hosted or cloud deployment
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Passbolt pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Passbolt actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (open-source), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Passbolt does not also cover.
Only in Passbolt
- Password sharing and folders
- Groups and role-based access
- Browser extensions and CLI
- Open API
- LDAP provisioning and SSO
- Activity audit log
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Passbolt
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Passbolt
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Passbolt
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Passbolt
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Passbolt
Passbolt
- Self-hosting a team password manager for data sovereigntynot Keycloak
- Provisioning vault access from an existing LDAP/AD directorynot Keycloak
- Sharing credentials across engineering or IT teams via folders and groupsnot Keycloak
- Automating credential retrieval through the CLI or open APInot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Passbolt
- Pro Edition requires a minimum of 10 users, making it costlier for very small teams.
- Community Edition lacks SSO and LDAP provisioning, which many organizations need for onboarding at scale.
- Self-hosting the Community Edition requires infrastructure and maintenance effort compared to fully managed competitors.
- Enterprise-tier support and HA consulting require custom, quote-based pricing rather than transparent rates.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Passbolt
Free- Community EditionFree
- Unlimited users
- Password sharing and folders
- Role-based access control
- Pro Edition$4.9/month
- Minimum 10 users, billed annually
- LDAP/AD provisioning
- Single sign-on
- Enterprise Edition$undefined/month
- High availability and disaster recovery consulting
- White-glove migration
- Custom feature development
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Passbolt if
- You need password sharing and folders.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- You also want groups and role-based access.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Passbolt better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Passbolt at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Passbolt?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Passbolt at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Passbolt run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Passbolt runs on web, windows, mac, linux, api.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Passbolt is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Passbolt cannot?
- Passbolt covers Password sharing and folders, Groups and role-based access, Browser extensions and CLI, Open API.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourcePassbolt: Is Passbolt free to use?
Yes. The Community Edition is free forever with unlimited users, including password sharing, folders, groups, role-based access, browser extensions, a CLI, and an open API.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourcePassbolt: What does the Pro Edition cost and add?
Pro Edition costs $4.90 per user per month billed annually, with a 10-user minimum, and adds LDAP/AD provisioning, single sign-on, account recovery escrow, activity audit logs, and next-business-day support.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourcePassbolt: What license is Passbolt distributed under?
All Passbolt editions, including Pro and Enterprise, are distributed under the AGPL v3 open-source license.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs authentik
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Authelia
- Keycloak vs Enpass
- Keycloak vs HashiCorp Vault
- Keycloak vs Infisical
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs Semgrep
- Keycloak vs Trivy
- Keycloak vs Chainguard
- Keycloak vs Trulioo
- Keycloak vs Unit21
- Keycloak vs Veracode
- Keycloak vs Very Good Security
- Keycloak vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Keycloak vs Windscribe
- Passbolt vs Penpot
- Passbolt vs Soketi
- Passbolt vs Ansible
- Passbolt vs Atlantis
- Passbolt vs Vite
- Passbolt vs Depot
- Passbolt vs Pants Build
- Passbolt vs Buildkite
- Passbolt vs Coder
- Passbolt vs Jitsu
- Passbolt vs Bitbucket
- Passbolt vs Sweep
- Passbolt vs Azure DevOps
- Passbolt vs Backstage
- Passbolt vs Claude Code
- Passbolt vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Passbolt vs Cody
- Passbolt vs Bitwarden
- Passbolt vs LastPass
- Passbolt vs authentik
- Passbolt vs 1Password
- Passbolt vs Authelia
- Passbolt vs Enpass
- Passbolt vs HashiCorp Vault
- Passbolt vs Infisical
- Passbolt vs Norton 360
- Passbolt vs Semgrep
- Passbolt vs Trivy
- Passbolt vs Chainguard
- Passbolt vs Trulioo
- Passbolt vs Unit21
- Passbolt vs Veracode
- Passbolt vs Very Good Security
- Passbolt vs VIVOTEK VAST Security Station
- Passbolt vs Windscribe
