Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Ory Kratos

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Ory Kratos headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Ory Kratos actually diverge.
| Attribute | Keycloak | Ory Kratos |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Open-source self-hosted, with a paid managed network |
| Platforms | Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API | Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted |
| Category | Developer Tools | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Ory Kratos does not also cover.
Only in Ory Kratos
- Headless API
- Self-service flows
- Multi-factor authentication
- Pluggable identity schemas
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Ory Kratos
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Ory Kratos
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Ory Kratos
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Ory Kratos
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Ory Kratos
Ory Kratos
- Products needing complete control over the look and flow of authenticationnot Keycloak
- Applications that must not hand user identity data to a third partynot Keycloak
- Teams building identity as infrastructure across several servicesnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Ory Kratos
- Headless means you build every screen, which is significant work compared with a hosted login page
- More moving parts than a monolithic IAM: Kratos handles identity, and OAuth2 needs Ory Hydra alongside
- Documentation assumes real familiarity with identity concepts and is not a gentle introduction
- Self-hosting identity carries the security and availability burden that hosted providers absorb
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Ory Kratos
Free- Self-hostedFree
- Full identity server
- All flows
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Ory Kratos if
- You need headless api.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- You also want self-service flows.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Ory Kratos better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Ory Kratos at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Ory Kratos?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Ory Kratos at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Ory Kratos run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Ory Kratos runs on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Self-hosted.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Ory Kratos is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Ory Kratos cannot?
- Ory Kratos covers Headless API, Self-service flows, Multi-factor authentication, Pluggable identity schemas.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceOry Kratos: Is Ory Kratos free?
Yes, open source and free to self-host. Ory Network is a paid managed service.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceOry Kratos: What does headless mean here?
Kratos provides identity flows as APIs and no user interface. You build the login, registration and recovery screens yourself.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceOry Kratos: Does Kratos do OAuth2?
No. Kratos handles user identity; OAuth2 and OpenID Connect provider functionality is Ory Hydra, a separate component.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Snyk
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Brave Browser
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs OneTrust
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs Proton Mail
- Keycloak vs Tuta
- Keycloak vs Akeyless
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Frontegg
- Ory Kratos vs Visual Studio Code
- Ory Kratos vs ESLint
- Ory Kratos vs pnpm
- Ory Kratos vs Turborepo
- Ory Kratos vs GitHub Copilot
- Ory Kratos vs Penpot
- Ory Kratos vs Rust
- Ory Kratos vs CLion
- Ory Kratos vs GNAT Pro
- Ory Kratos vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Ory Kratos vs GNU Emacs
- Ory Kratos vs Keil MDK
- Ory Kratos vs Vite
- Ory Kratos vs Bazel
- Ory Kratos vs CodeSandbox
- Ory Kratos vs Eclipse IDE
- Ory Kratos vs Moonrepo
- Ory Kratos vs Nx Cloud
- Ory Kratos vs 1Password
- Ory Kratos vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Ory Kratos vs Norton 360
- Ory Kratos vs LastPass
- Ory Kratos vs Snyk
- Ory Kratos vs Bitwarden
- Ory Kratos vs Brave Browser
- Ory Kratos vs Clerk
- Ory Kratos vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Ory Kratos vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Ory Kratos vs Mullvad VPN
- Ory Kratos vs OneTrust
- Ory Kratos vs Private Internet Access
- Ory Kratos vs Proton Mail
- Ory Kratos vs Tuta
- Ory Kratos vs Akeyless
- Ory Kratos vs Doppler
- Ory Kratos vs Frontegg

