Cybersecurity · head to head
Authelia vs Keycloak

Authelia
Cybersecurity
Open-source authentication and two-factor portal for reverse proxies
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Authelia depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Authelia and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Authelia
- Reverse proxy integration
- Two-factor authentication
- Access control rules
- Lightweight backends
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Authelia does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Authelia
- Putting a login and 2FA in front of self-hosted services that have nonenot Keycloak
- Adding SSO across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platformnot Keycloak
- Home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxynot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Authelia
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Authelia
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Authelia
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Authelia
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Authelia
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Authelia
- Depends on a reverse proxy: it is not a standalone identity provider
- Configuration is YAML-first with no administrative interface, so changes mean editing files
- Not a full IAM: user management, provisioning and federation are limited compared with Keycloak
- Scales poorly as an organisation-wide identity solution, which is not its target
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Authelia
Free- AutheliaFree
- Full functionality
- No usage limits
- Community support
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Authelia if
- You need reverse proxy integration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want two-factor authentication.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Authelia or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Authelia starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Authelia or Keycloak?
- Authelia starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Authelia or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Authelia runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Authelia for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Authelia best used for?
- Authelia is most often used for putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none, adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform, home and small-team infrastructure behind a single reverse proxy. Of those, putting a login and 2fa in front of self-hosted services that have none and adding sso across a small set of internal tools without a full identity platform are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Authelia do that Keycloak cannot?
- Authelia covers Reverse proxy integration, Two-factor authentication, Access control rules, Lightweight backends.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Authelia: Is Authelia free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceAuthelia: Does Authelia need a reverse proxy?
Yes. It integrates through forward authentication with Nginx, Traefik, Caddy or HAProxy rather than sitting in front of traffic itself.
Keycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceAuthelia: Authelia or Keycloak?
Authelia is far lighter and aimed at protecting self-hosted services behind a proxy. Keycloak is a full identity and access management platform, and much more to run.
Keycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Authelia vs authentik
- Authelia vs Logto
- Authelia vs Ory Kratos
- Authelia vs Frontegg
- Authelia vs Infisical
- Authelia vs Bitwarden
- Authelia vs Semgrep
- Authelia vs Trivy
- Authelia vs Chainguard
- Authelia vs Passbolt
- Authelia vs 1Password
- Authelia vs Signicat
- Authelia vs Silent Eight
- Authelia vs Socket
- Authelia vs Socure
- Authelia vs SonicWall
- Authelia vs Sophos Intercept X
- Authelia vs Ory
- Authelia vs Penpot
- Authelia vs Atlantis
- Authelia vs Soketi
- Authelia vs Vite
- Authelia vs Depot
- Authelia vs Ansible
- Authelia vs Buildkite
- Authelia vs Coder
- Authelia vs Bitbucket
- Authelia vs Sweep
- Authelia vs Turborepo
- Authelia vs CodeSandbox
- Authelia vs Azure DevOps
- Authelia vs Backstage
- Authelia vs Claude Code
- Authelia vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Authelia vs Cody
- Keycloak vs authentik
- Keycloak vs Logto
- Keycloak vs Ory Kratos
- Keycloak vs Frontegg
- Keycloak vs Infisical
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Semgrep
- Keycloak vs Trivy
- Keycloak vs Chainguard
- Keycloak vs Passbolt
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Signicat
- Keycloak vs Silent Eight
- Keycloak vs Socket
- Keycloak vs Socure
- Keycloak vs SonicWall
- Keycloak vs Sophos Intercept X
- Keycloak vs Ory
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
