Developer Tools · head to head
Keycloak vs Ory

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Ory
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity, authentication, and permissions infrastructure
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain; Ory production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Keycloak and Ory actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Ory does not also cover.
Only in Ory
- Authentication APIs
- Permissions engine
- Machine-to-machine tokens
- B2B organizations
- SAML SSO
- Multi-region deployments
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Ory
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Ory
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Ory
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Ory
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Ory
Ory
- Adding self-hosted or cloud identity to a new productnot Keycloak
- Implementing fine-grained permission checksnot Keycloak
- Supporting B2B organizations and multi-tenancynot Keycloak
- Building machine-to-machine authentication for microservicesnot Keycloak
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Ory
- Production and Growth plans are billed annually ($770/year and $9,350/year), which is a larger upfront commitment than monthly-only competitors.
- SAML SSO and multi-region deployments are reserved for the custom-priced Enterprise tier.
- Usage-based pricing across aDAU, M2M tokens, and permission checks makes cost estimation more complex than flat per-MAU billing.
Pricing, plan by plan
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Ory
Free- DeveloperFree
- Community support
- No production environments
- Production$64/month
- $21 monthly credit included
- 1 production environment
- 3 staging environments
- Growth$779/month
- $255 monthly credit included
- 2 production environments
- B2B organizations (max 3)
Which should you pick?
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Choose Ory if
- You need authentication apis.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want permissions engine.
Questions people ask
- Is Keycloak or Ory better?
- Neither clearly leads. Keycloak starts at Free and Ory at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Keycloak or Ory?
- Keycloak starts at Free and Ory at Free.
- Does Keycloak or Ory run on more platforms?
- Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API. Ory runs on web, api.
- Can I use Keycloak for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Keycloak best used for?
- Keycloak is most often used for organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency, companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication, open-source projects and communities requiring free iam without licensing costs, enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisation. Of those, organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residency and companies with existing ldap/active directory systems needing federated authentication are not what Ory is typically brought in for.
- What can Keycloak do that Ory cannot?
- Ory covers Authentication APIs, Permissions engine, Machine-to-machine tokens, B2B organizations.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Keycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceOry: What does Ory cost?
Ory has a free Developer tier, a Production plan at $770/year including a $21 monthly credit, a Growth plan at $9,350/year including a $255 monthly credit, and custom Enterprise pricing.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceOry: How is usage metered?
Beyond the included credit, Ory charges per average daily active user (aDAU), per machine-to-machine token, and per permission check, with lower per-unit rates on the Growth plan.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceOry: What payment methods are supported?
Ory accepts credit cards (Visa, MasterCard, Amex) and bank transfer, processed via Stripe.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Soketi
- Keycloak vs Ansible
- Keycloak vs Atlantis
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Depot
- Keycloak vs Pants Build
- Keycloak vs Buildkite
- Keycloak vs Coder
- Keycloak vs Jitsu
- Keycloak vs Bitbucket
- Keycloak vs Sweep
- Keycloak vs Azure DevOps
- Keycloak vs Backstage
- Keycloak vs Claude Code
- Keycloak vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Keycloak vs Cody
- Keycloak vs Logto
- Keycloak vs authentik
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Keycloak vs Authelia
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Infisical
- Keycloak vs Chainguard
- Keycloak vs Sigstore
- Keycloak vs OWASP ZAP
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Semgrep
- Keycloak vs Trivy
- Keycloak vs Avast One
- Keycloak vs Cosign
- Keycloak vs CyberGhost VPN
- Keycloak vs Dahua Technology
- Ory vs Penpot
- Ory vs Soketi
- Ory vs Ansible
- Ory vs Atlantis
- Ory vs Vite
- Ory vs Depot
- Ory vs Pants Build
- Ory vs Buildkite
- Ory vs Coder
- Ory vs Jitsu
- Ory vs Bitbucket
- Ory vs Sweep
- Ory vs Azure DevOps
- Ory vs Backstage
- Ory vs Claude Code
- Ory vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Ory vs Cody
- Ory vs Logto
- Ory vs authentik
- Ory vs Clerk
- Ory vs Authelia
- Ory vs 1Password
- Ory vs Infisical
- Ory vs Chainguard
- Ory vs Sigstore
- Ory vs OWASP ZAP
- Ory vs Bitwarden
- Ory vs Semgrep
- Ory vs Trivy
- Ory vs Avast One
- Ory vs Cosign
- Ory vs CyberGhost VPN
- Ory vs Dahua Technology
