Cybersecurity · head to head
Infisical vs Keycloak

Infisical
Cybersecurity
Security infrastructure for developers and AI agents
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Keycloak
Developer Tools
Open-source identity and access management server.
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Infisical free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation; Keycloak requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Infisical and Keycloak actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Infisical
- Secrets management
- Certificate management
- Privileged access management
- Secret versioning
- Dynamic secrets
- SAML SSO
- Open-source core
- Secrets scanning
Only in Keycloak
Nothing recorded that Infisical does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Infisical
- Managing secrets across Kubernetes clustersnot Keycloak
- Automating certificate lifecycle for internal PKInot Keycloak
- Providing privileged database access with audit trailsnot Keycloak
- Securing credentials for AI agents at runtimenot Keycloak
Keycloak
- Organisations requiring self-hosted identity infrastructure for compliance or data residencynot Infisical
- Companies with existing LDAP/Active Directory systems needing federated authenticationnot Infisical
- Open-source projects and communities requiring free IAM without licensing costsnot Infisical
- Enterprises building custom identity workflows requiring fine-grained authorisationnot Infisical
- Teams with sufficient operational expertise to manage infrastructurenot Infisical
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Infisical
- Free tier limited to 5 identities, suitable only for small teams or evaluation
- Pricing tiers are per-identity, which scales costs with team size
- Certificate management requires Enterprise plan for advanced features like wildcards
- Privileged access tier is separate billing from secrets management
Keycloak
- Requires self-hosted deployment and operational expertise to install, configure and maintain
- No managed cloud option provided by Red Hat; organisations must operate infrastructure themselves or use third-party distributions
- Clustering and high-availability configurations require additional operational knowledge
- Community support only; commercial support requires third-party vendors or distributions
Pricing, plan by plan
Infisical
Free- FreeFree
- 5 identities
- Unlimited projects
- 3 environments
- Pro - Secrets$20/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Pro - Secrets (Annual)$20/year
- Annual discount available
- Unlimited identities
- SAML SSO
- Advanced - Secrets$40/month
- Per-identity pricing
- Dynamic secrets
- Gateways
Keycloak
Free- Open-sourceFree
- Full platform functionality
- Self-hosted deployment
- Community support
Which should you pick?
Choose Infisical if
- You need secrets management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted.
- You also want certificate management.
Choose Keycloak if
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
Questions people ask
- Is Infisical or Keycloak better?
- Neither clearly leads. Infisical starts at Free and Keycloak at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Infisical or Keycloak?
- Infisical starts at Free and Keycloak at Free.
- Does Infisical or Keycloak run on more platforms?
- Infisical runs on Web, CLI, Cloud, Self-Hosted. Keycloak runs on Self-hosted, Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Windows, API.
- Can I use Infisical for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Infisical best used for?
- Infisical is most often used for managing secrets across kubernetes clusters, automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki, providing privileged database access with audit trails, securing credentials for ai agents at runtime. Of those, managing secrets across kubernetes clusters and automating certificate lifecycle for internal pki are not what Keycloak is typically brought in for.
- What can Infisical do that Keycloak cannot?
- Infisical covers Secrets management, Certificate management, Privileged access management, Secret versioning.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Infisical: How is pricing calculated for Secrets Management?
Pricing is per-identity per month. Free tier includes 5 identities. Pro tier is $20/identity/month, Advanced is $40/identity/month. All pricing in USD.
SourceKeycloak: What protocols does Keycloak support?
Keycloak supports OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0 and SAML 2.0 protocols for authentication and authorisation.
SourceInfisical: Can I self-host Infisical?
Yes, Infisical's core is open-source under the MIT license and can be self-hosted. The managed cloud service is also available with additional features.
SourceKeycloak: Can Keycloak integrate with existing user directories?
Yes. Keycloak supports user federation with LDAP and Active Directory systems, allowing organisations to leverage existing user directories.
SourceInfisical: What is included in the Enterprise plan?
Enterprise plan includes SCIM, LDAP, approval workflows, external KMS/HSM support, and 99.99% SLA. Pricing is custom and determined by annual commitment.
SourceKeycloak: Is Keycloak free?
Yes. Keycloak is fully open-source and free to deploy and use. No licensing fees are required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Infisical vs 1Password
- Infisical vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Infisical vs Norton 360
- Infisical vs LastPass
- Infisical vs Snyk
- Infisical vs Bitwarden
- Infisical vs Brave Browser
- Infisical vs Clerk
- Infisical vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Infisical vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Infisical vs Mullvad VPN
- Infisical vs OneTrust
- Infisical vs Private Internet Access
- Infisical vs Proton Mail
- Infisical vs Tuta
- Infisical vs Akeyless
- Infisical vs Doppler
- Infisical vs Frontegg
- Infisical vs Visual Studio Code
- Infisical vs ESLint
- Infisical vs pnpm
- Infisical vs Turborepo
- Infisical vs GitHub Copilot
- Infisical vs Penpot
- Infisical vs Rust
- Infisical vs CLion
- Infisical vs GNAT Pro
- Infisical vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Infisical vs GNU Emacs
- Infisical vs Keil MDK
- Infisical vs Vite
- Infisical vs Bazel
- Infisical vs CodeSandbox
- Infisical vs Eclipse IDE
- Infisical vs Moonrepo
- Infisical vs Nx Cloud
- Keycloak vs 1Password
- Keycloak vs Bitdefender Total Security
- Keycloak vs Norton 360
- Keycloak vs LastPass
- Keycloak vs Snyk
- Keycloak vs Bitwarden
- Keycloak vs Brave Browser
- Keycloak vs Clerk
- Keycloak vs CrowdStrike Falcon
- Keycloak vs Kaspersky Total Security
- Keycloak vs Mullvad VPN
- Keycloak vs OneTrust
- Keycloak vs Private Internet Access
- Keycloak vs Proton Mail
- Keycloak vs Tuta
- Keycloak vs Akeyless
- Keycloak vs Doppler
- Keycloak vs Frontegg
- Keycloak vs Visual Studio Code
- Keycloak vs ESLint
- Keycloak vs pnpm
- Keycloak vs Turborepo
- Keycloak vs GitHub Copilot
- Keycloak vs Penpot
- Keycloak vs Rust
- Keycloak vs CLion
- Keycloak vs GNAT Pro
- Keycloak vs IAR Embedded Workbench
- Keycloak vs GNU Emacs
- Keycloak vs Keil MDK
- Keycloak vs Vite
- Keycloak vs Bazel
- Keycloak vs CodeSandbox
- Keycloak vs Eclipse IDE
- Keycloak vs Moonrepo
- Keycloak vs Nx Cloud
