Cybersecurity · head to head
authentik vs Depot

authentik
Cybersecurity
Open-source identity provider with flexible authentication flows
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes

Depot
Developer Tools
Cloud-based builds and CI runs 55x faster with less cost
- From
- Free
- Free plan
- Yes
The short version
- Each has a real cost: authentik smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides; Depot developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- They diverge on capability: authentik covers Configurable flows, Depot covers Depot CI.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which authentik and Depot actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in authentik
- Configurable flows
- Protocol support
- Application proxy
- Modern admin interface
Only in Depot
- Depot CI
- Container builds
- GitHub Actions runners
- Distributed caching
- Build API
- Depot Registry
- Cross-platform builds
- SSH debugging
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
authentik
- Self-hosted SSO across internal services without commercial identity pricingnot Depot
- Putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxynot Depot
- Teams who tried Keycloak and wanted something less heavynot Depot
Depot
- Accelerating Docker builds for container-based developmentnot authentik
- Replacing GitHub Actions runners with faster infrastructurenot authentik
- Distributing cache across Monorepo buildsnot authentik
- Debugging failed CI builds interactively with SSHnot authentik
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
authentik
- Smaller project than Keycloak, with a correspondingly smaller community and fewer integration guides
- The flow model is flexible but conceptually unfamiliar, and simple setups can feel over-abstracted
- Enterprise support and some governance features sit behind the paid tier
- Self-hosted identity is still yours to secure, patch and keep available
Depot
- Developer plan minute limits may be insufficient for active development
- Startup plan at $200/mo is expensive for smaller teams
- Business plan requires custom pricing consultation
- macOS M2 runners not available on Developer plan
Pricing, plan by plan
authentik
Free- Open sourceFree
- Full identity provider
- All protocols
- Community support
Depot
Free- Developer$20/month
- 1 user
- 500 Docker build minutes per month
- 2,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Startup$200/month
- Unlimited users
- 5,000 Docker build minutes per month
- 20,000 Depot CI minutes per month
- Business$undefined/custom
- Custom pricing
- Unlimited users
- Custom monthly compute
Which should you pick?
Choose authentik if
- You need configurable flows.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted.
- You also want protocol support.
Choose Depot if
- You need depot ci.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- You also want container builds.
Questions people ask
- Is authentik or Depot better?
- Neither clearly leads. authentik starts at Free and Depot at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, authentik or Depot?
- authentik starts at Free and Depot at Free.
- Does authentik or Depot run on more platforms?
- authentik runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Linux, Self-hosted. Depot runs on Cloud, GitHub, CLI.
- Can I use authentik for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is authentik best used for?
- authentik is most often used for self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing, putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy, teams who tried keycloak and wanted something less heavy. Of those, self-hosted sso across internal services without commercial identity pricing and putting authentication in front of applications that have none, via the proxy are not what Depot is typically brought in for.
- What can authentik do that Depot cannot?
- authentik covers Configurable flows, Protocol support, Application proxy, Modern admin interface. Depot covers Depot CI, Container builds, GitHub Actions runners, Distributed caching.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
authentik: Is authentik free?
The open-source edition is free and complete for most use. An enterprise tier adds support and additional features.
Depot: How much faster are Depot runners compared to GitHub Actions?
Depot runners offer 30% faster CPUs and 10x faster networking than standard GitHub-hosted runners, enabling builds to complete significantly faster.
Sourceauthentik: authentik or Keycloak?
authentik is generally reported as easier to run and administer; Keycloak is more established with a larger community and Red Hat behind it.
Depot: What is included in the Developer plan?
Developer plan ($20/month) includes 500 Docker build minutes, 2,000 Depot CI minutes, 2,000 GitHub Actions minutes, 25 GB storage, unlimited concurrency, and community support.
Sourceauthentik: Can authentik protect apps with no login of their own?
Yes. Its application proxy places authentication in front of services that have no built-in authentication.
Depot: Can I use Depot with my own AWS account?
Yes, Depot Managed allows deployment within customer AWS accounts. This is available to interested customers; contact sales for details.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- authentik vs Authelia
- authentik vs Logto
- authentik vs Ory
- authentik vs Passbolt
- authentik vs Clerk
- authentik vs 1Password
- authentik vs Frontegg
- authentik vs OWASP ZAP
- authentik vs Infisical
- authentik vs Chainguard
- authentik vs Bitwarden
- authentik vs Cosign
- authentik vs CyberGhost VPN
- authentik vs Dahua Technology
- authentik vs Descope
- authentik vs Drata
- authentik vs DTiQ
- authentik vs Ory Kratos
- authentik vs WarpBuild
- authentik vs Blacksmith
- authentik vs Nixpacks
- authentik vs Buildkite
- authentik vs GitLab CI/CD
- authentik vs Namespace
- authentik vs Earthly
- authentik vs Nx Cloud
- authentik vs Dagger
- authentik vs Garden
- authentik vs Ansible
- authentik vs ConfigCat
- authentik vs Avo
- authentik vs Azure DevOps
- authentik vs Backstage
- authentik vs Bitbucket
- authentik vs Claude Code
- authentik vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
- Depot vs Authelia
- Depot vs Logto
- Depot vs Ory
- Depot vs Passbolt
- Depot vs Clerk
- Depot vs 1Password
- Depot vs Frontegg
- Depot vs OWASP ZAP
- Depot vs Infisical
- Depot vs Chainguard
- Depot vs Bitwarden
- Depot vs Cosign
- Depot vs CyberGhost VPN
- Depot vs Dahua Technology
- Depot vs Descope
- Depot vs Drata
- Depot vs DTiQ
- Depot vs Ory Kratos
- Depot vs WarpBuild
- Depot vs Blacksmith
- Depot vs Nixpacks
- Depot vs Buildkite
- Depot vs GitLab CI/CD
- Depot vs Namespace
- Depot vs Earthly
- Depot vs Nx Cloud
- Depot vs Dagger
- Depot vs Garden
- Depot vs Ansible
- Depot vs ConfigCat
- Depot vs Avo
- Depot vs Azure DevOps
- Depot vs Backstage
- Depot vs Bitbucket
- Depot vs Claude Code
- Depot vs Cloud Native Buildpacks
