Manufacturing · head to head
Augury vs Tractian

Augury
Manufacturing
Machine health monitoring sold as a per-machine annual service including sensors, installation and analyst diagnostics
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tractian
Field Service
CMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
- From
- $60/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Augury the per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.; Tractian sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- They diverge on capability: Augury covers Halo sensors, Tractian covers Published per-user pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Augury and Tractian actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Augury
- Halo sensors
- Diagnostics as a Service
- Named fault diagnosis
- Process Health
- CMMS integration
- Installation included
- Fleet views
- Unlimited users
Only in Tractian
- Published per-user pricing
- Unlimited requesters
- Smart Trac sensors
- Automatic work order creation
- Mobile execution
- Preventive maintenance planning
- Power BI connector
- ERP integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Augury
- A food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staffnot Tractian
- A multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teamsnot Tractian
- An operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a servicenot Tractian
- A site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidencenot Tractian
Tractian
- A mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan worknot Augury
- Instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration projectnot Augury
- A maintenance manager who needs a defensible budget figure before an approval meeting rather than a quote in three weeksnot Augury
- A multi-site manufacturer wanting the same CMMS and sensor platform across Brazilian, Mexican and United States plantsnot Augury
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Augury
- The per-machine annual fee never stops, so over a five to eight year horizon the total exceeds buying sensors and software outright and running the programme yourself.
- Coverage is aimed at standard rotating equipment; reciprocating compressors, very low-speed machinery and non-rotating assets are poorly served, so you still need a second monitoring approach.
- Diagnoses depend on Augurys analysts, which means the quality of your programme is set by a vendor queue you do not control and turnaround is not something you can escalate internally.
- The sensors and the analytics are one system, so leaving Augury means removing the hardware and starting again; there is no path to keep the sensors and change the software.
- Pricing is unpublished and negotiated per fleet, so buyers have no benchmark and comparable plants can pay materially different per-machine rates.
Tractian
- Sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- Smart Trac hardware reports into the Tractian platform, so a plant that later changes analytics vendor writes off the installed sensor base.
- The five-user minimum on Standard and ten-user minimum on Enterprise put a floor under the cost that small maintenance teams cannot get below.
- ERP integration, single sign-on and the Power BI connector are Enterprise-only, so an organisation needing SAP integration pays the higher rate for every licensed user including technicians who need none of it.
- The company is young and venture-funded with rapid product expansion, so enterprise features are newer than the core CMMS and reference sites at large industrial scale are fewer than for established EAM vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Augury
On request- Machine Health$undefined/year
- Flat annual fee per monitored machine
- Sensors, gateway, connectivity and installation included
- Unlimited users and unlimited diagnostic reviews
Tractian
$60/month- Standard$60/month
- From 60 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum five users
- Unlimited assets and unlimited requester accounts
- Enterprise$100/month
- From 100 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum ten users
- Single sign-on and custom entities
- Bundle$undefined/year
- CMMS combined with condition monitoring sensors
- Priced per monitored asset, quoted rather than published
- Includes failure detection, root cause analysis and reliability support
Which should you pick?
Choose Augury if
- You need halo sensors.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want diagnostics as a service.
Choose Tractian if
- You need published per-user pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want unlimited requesters.
Questions people ask
- Is Augury or Tractian better?
- Neither clearly leads. Augury starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Augury or Tractian?
- Augury starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month.
- Does Augury or Tractian run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Augury best used for?
- Augury is most often used for a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff, a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams, an operator whose capex budget will not approve sensor hardware but whose opex budget will approve a service, a site trying to move from calendar-based motor overhauls to condition-based intervals with defensible evidence. Of those, a food plant with 200 similar motors and pumps and no vibration analyst on staff and a multi-site manufacturer that needs one reliability picture across plants without standardising their maintenance teams are not what Tractian is typically brought in for.
- What can Augury do that Tractian cannot?
- Augury covers Halo sensors, Diagnostics as a Service, Named fault diagnosis, Process Health. Tractian covers Published per-user pricing, Unlimited requesters, Smart Trac sensors, Automatic work order creation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Augury: Do I buy the sensors?
No. Sensors, gateways, connectivity and installation are included in the per-machine annual fee.
Tractian: What does the CMMS actually cost?
Standard is from 60 USD per user per month with five users minimum, Enterprise from 100 USD with ten minimum, both billed annually.
Augury: Is there a per-user licence?
No. The web application allows unlimited users; the meter is monitored machines.
Tractian: Are the sensors included?
No. Both CMMS tiers explicitly exclude sensors, which are priced per monitored asset under a separate bundle that is not published.
Augury: Who does the diagnosis?
Machine-learning models flag issues and Augury vibration analysts review them before a finding is released to you.
Tractian: Do fault reporters need licences?
No. Requester accounts are unlimited on both tiers, which is the main reason the per-user price is workable for large plants.
Augury: What happens if we cancel?
The sensors are part of the service and monitoring stops; you do not retain a usable standalone system.
Tractian: Can I use the sensors with another platform?
No. Smart Trac hardware reports to the Tractian platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Augury vs KCF Technologies
- Augury vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Augury vs Sensemore
- Augury vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Augury vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Augury vs Erbessd Instruments
- Augury vs PROGNOST Systems
- Augury vs Petasense
- Augury vs MOVUS
- Augury vs Samotics
- Augury vs Poseidon Systems
- Augury vs eMaint
- Augury vs ABB 800xA
- Augury vs AVEVA System Platform
- Augury vs Hippo CMMS
- Augury vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Augury vs 3YOURMIND
- Augury vs AMFG
- Augury vs FaciliWorks
- Augury vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Augury vs Fracttal One
- Augury vs MaintainX
- Augury vs Redlist
- Augury vs Joblogic
- Augury vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Augury vs Commusoft
- Augury vs Properly
- Augury vs BigChange
- Augury vs Repsly
- Augury vs Jobber
- Augury vs Tradify
- Augury vs Vonigo
- Augury vs Workiz
- Augury vs Zuper
- Augury vs FieldEdge
- Tractian vs KCF Technologies
- Tractian vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Tractian vs Sensemore
- Tractian vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Tractian vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Tractian vs Erbessd Instruments
- Tractian vs PROGNOST Systems
- Tractian vs Petasense
- Tractian vs MOVUS
- Tractian vs Samotics
- Tractian vs Poseidon Systems
- Tractian vs eMaint
- Tractian vs ABB 800xA
- Tractian vs AVEVA System Platform
- Tractian vs Hippo CMMS
- Tractian vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Tractian vs 3YOURMIND
- Tractian vs AMFG
- Tractian vs FaciliWorks
- Tractian vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Tractian vs Fracttal One
- Tractian vs MaintainX
- Tractian vs Redlist
- Tractian vs Joblogic
- Tractian vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Tractian vs Commusoft
- Tractian vs Properly
- Tractian vs BigChange
- Tractian vs Repsly
- Tractian vs Jobber
- Tractian vs Tradify
- Tractian vs Vonigo
- Tractian vs Workiz
- Tractian vs Zuper
- Tractian vs FieldEdge
