Manufacturing · head to head
Petasense vs Tractian

Petasense
Manufacturing
Wireless vibration and asset reliability monitoring, now owned by AssetWatch
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tractian
Field Service
CMMS with published per-user pricing plus vibration sensors sold as a separate per-asset subscription
- From
- $60/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Petasense petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.; Tractian sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- They diverge on capability: Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Tractian covers Published per-user pricing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Petasense and Tractian actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Petasense
- Vibration Mote
- Transmitter range
- ARO cloud
- VFD-specific monitoring
- Reliability workflow
- Mixed wired and wireless
Only in Tractian
- Published per-user pricing
- Unlimited requesters
- Smart Trac sensors
- Automatic work order creation
- Mobile execution
- Preventive maintenance planning
- Power BI connector
- ERP integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Petasense
- A reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround routenot Tractian
- A plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarmsnot Tractian
- Mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop productionnot Tractian
- A manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboardnot Tractian
Tractian
- A mid-market plant replacing spreadsheet maintenance planning where hundreds of operators must report faults but only a dozen plan worknot Petasense
- Instrumenting critical motors and pumps and having detected faults become work orders without an integration projectnot Petasense
- A maintenance manager who needs a defensible budget figure before an approval meeting rather than a quote in three weeksnot Petasense
- A multi-site manufacturer wanting the same CMMS and sensor platform across Brazilian, Mexican and United States plantsnot Petasense
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Petasense
- Petasense is now owned by AssetWatch, whose business is monitoring delivered as a managed service, so a buyer wanting self-service software should get the delivery model written into the contract rather than assume it.
- Hardware is required per measurement point and gateways are required per area, so the up-front capital for a plant-wide deployment is substantial and separate from the subscription.
- Per-asset subscription pricing scales linearly, which makes full coverage of a large population of low-value motors uneconomic compared with route-based monitoring.
- Nothing is published on sensor cost, subscription rate, gateway requirements or contract length, so a total cost of ownership figure requires a full sales engagement before you can compare it against anything.
- Battery-powered wireless sensors trade measurement richness for battery life, so the sampling rate and resolution are lower than a wired analyser would give, which limits diagnosis of high-frequency bearing defects on critical machines.
Tractian
- Sensors are excluded from both published CMMS tiers and are quoted per monitored asset, so the transparent rate card covers only the part of the deployment that costs least.
- Smart Trac hardware reports into the Tractian platform, so a plant that later changes analytics vendor writes off the installed sensor base.
- The five-user minimum on Standard and ten-user minimum on Enterprise put a floor under the cost that small maintenance teams cannot get below.
- ERP integration, single sign-on and the Power BI connector are Enterprise-only, so an organisation needing SAP integration pays the higher rate for every licensed user including technicians who need none of it.
- The company is young and venture-funded with rapid product expansion, so enterprise features are newer than the core CMMS and reference sites at large industrial scale are fewer than for established EAM vendors.
Pricing, plan by plan
Petasense
On request- Petasense ARO$undefined/year
- Subscription priced per monitored asset
- Vibration Mote or Transmitter hardware required per measurement point
- Gateway hardware required for wireless deployments
Tractian
$60/month- Standard$60/month
- From 60 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum five users
- Unlimited assets and unlimited requester accounts
- Enterprise$100/month
- From 100 USD per user per month, billed annually
- Minimum ten users
- Single sign-on and custom entities
- Bundle$undefined/year
- CMMS combined with condition monitoring sensors
- Priced per monitored asset, quoted rather than published
- Includes failure detection, root cause analysis and reliability support
Which should you pick?
Choose Petasense if
- You need vibration mote.
- You work on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android.
- You also want transmitter range.
Choose Tractian if
- You need published per-user pricing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want unlimited requesters.
Questions people ask
- Is Petasense or Tractian better?
- Neither clearly leads. Petasense starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Petasense or Tractian?
- Petasense starts at On request and Tractian at $60/month.
- Does Petasense or Tractian run on more platforms?
- Petasense runs on Web, Cloud, iOS, Android. Tractian runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Petasense best used for?
- Petasense is most often used for a reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround route, a plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarms, mixing battery sensors on accessible pumps with wired sensors on the handful of assets that would stop production, a manufacturer with no in-house vibration analyst that wants the analysis delivered as a service rather than as a dashboard. Of those, a reliability team wanting continuous vibration data on assets currently covered by a quarterly walkaround route and a plant with variable frequency drive assets where generic vibration analytics produce too many false alarms are not what Tractian is typically brought in for.
- What can Petasense do that Tractian cannot?
- Petasense covers Vibration Mote, Transmitter range, ARO cloud, VFD-specific monitoring. Tractian covers Published per-user pricing, Unlimited requesters, Smart Trac sensors, Automatic work order creation.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Petasense: Is Petasense still a separate product?
Yes. It trades under its own name with its own product line, but the owner since January 2024 is AssetWatch.
Tractian: What does the CMMS actually cost?
Standard is from 60 USD per user per month with five users minimum, Enterprise from 100 USD with ten minimum, both billed annually.
Petasense: Do I have to buy Petasense hardware?
Yes. The platform is built around its own Motes and Transmitters; it is not a bring-your-own-sensor analytics product.
Tractian: Are the sensors included?
No. Both CMMS tiers explicitly exclude sensors, which are priced per monitored asset under a separate bundle that is not published.
Petasense: Can I get monitoring as a service?
Yes, through parent AssetWatch, whose model is condition monitoring engineers reviewing your data. Clarify which model your quote covers.
Tractian: Do fault reporters need licences?
No. Requester accounts are unlimited on both tiers, which is the main reason the per-user price is workable for large plants.
Petasense: How is it priced?
Per monitored asset on subscription, plus sensors and gateways. Nothing is published.
Tractian: Can I use the sensors with another platform?
No. Smart Trac hardware reports to the Tractian platform.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Petasense vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Petasense vs Samotics
- Petasense vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Petasense vs MOVUS
- Petasense vs Augury
- Petasense vs eMaint
- Petasense vs KCF Technologies
- Petasense vs Erbessd Instruments
- Petasense vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Petasense vs Sensemore
- Petasense vs Poseidon Systems
- Petasense vs PROGNOST Systems
- Petasense vs Maintenance Connection
- Petasense vs Markforged Eiger
- Petasense vs Materialise Magics
- Petasense vs Oden Technologies
- Petasense vs OpenBOM
- Petasense vs FaciliWorks
- Petasense vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Petasense vs Fracttal One
- Petasense vs MaintainX
- Petasense vs Redlist
- Petasense vs Joblogic
- Petasense vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Petasense vs Commusoft
- Petasense vs Properly
- Petasense vs BigChange
- Petasense vs Repsly
- Petasense vs Jobber
- Petasense vs Tradify
- Petasense vs Vonigo
- Petasense vs Workiz
- Petasense vs Zuper
- Petasense vs FieldEdge
- Tractian vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Tractian vs Samotics
- Tractian vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Tractian vs MOVUS
- Tractian vs Augury
- Tractian vs eMaint
- Tractian vs KCF Technologies
- Tractian vs Erbessd Instruments
- Tractian vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Tractian vs Sensemore
- Tractian vs Poseidon Systems
- Tractian vs PROGNOST Systems
- Tractian vs Maintenance Connection
- Tractian vs Markforged Eiger
- Tractian vs Materialise Magics
- Tractian vs Oden Technologies
- Tractian vs OpenBOM
- Tractian vs FaciliWorks
- Tractian vs IFS Ultimo EAM
- Tractian vs Fracttal One
- Tractian vs MaintainX
- Tractian vs Redlist
- Tractian vs Joblogic
- Tractian vs Brightly Asset Essentials
- Tractian vs Commusoft
- Tractian vs Properly
- Tractian vs BigChange
- Tractian vs Repsly
- Tractian vs Jobber
- Tractian vs Tradify
- Tractian vs Vonigo
- Tractian vs Workiz
- Tractian vs Zuper
- Tractian vs FieldEdge
