Software · head to head
ARKit vs Three.js
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ARKit iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems; Three.js forward rendering pipeline only, no deferred rendering support
- They diverge on capability: ARKit covers World tracking, Three.js covers WebGL rendering.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ARKit and Three.js actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ARKit
- World tracking
- Face tracking
- Body tracking
- LiDAR support
- RealityKit
- Reality Composer
- SceneKit
- Ar support
Only in Three.js
- WebGL rendering
- Scene graph
- Materials system
- Animation system
- WebXR
- Post-processing
- Physics
- Loaders
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ARKit
- VR Gaming
- AR Marketing
- Virtual Training
- 3D Visualization
- Immersive Experiences
Three.js
- VR Gaming
- AR Marketing
- Virtual Training
- 3D Visualization
- Immersive Experiences
Both are used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization, immersive experiences, on those jobs the choice comes down to price and fit rather than capability.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ARKit
- iOS-only platform, not available for Android or other operating systems
- Location-based AR accuracy limited to 3-5 meters, insufficient for precise applications
- Cannot handle very fast motion capture
- Accuracy varies with lighting conditions and surface characteristics
- Requires iOS 11 or later and specific device hardware
Three.js
- Forward rendering pipeline only, no deferred rendering support
- No built-in collision detection or spatial indexing, requiring external physics libraries
- WebGL dependency means no support for non-WebGL environments
Pricing, plan by plan
ARKit
Free- FreeFree
- Full SDK
- Documentation
- Sample code
Three.js
Free- FreeFree
- Full library
- WebXR module
- Examples
Which should you pick?
Choose ARKit if
- You need world tracking.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS.
- You also want face tracking.
Choose Three.js if
- You need webgl rendering.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.
- You also want scene graph.
Questions people ask
- Is ARKit or Three.js better?
- Neither clearly leads. ARKit starts at Free and Three.js at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ARKit or Three.js?
- ARKit starts at Free and Three.js at Free.
- Does ARKit or Three.js run on more platforms?
- ARKit runs on iOS, iPadOS, macOS, visionOS. Three.js runs on Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android.
- Can I use ARKit for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ARKit best used for?
- ARKit is most often used for vr gaming, ar marketing, virtual training, 3d visualization.
- What can ARKit do that Three.js cannot?
- ARKit covers World tracking, Face tracking, Body tracking, LiDAR support. Three.js covers WebGL rendering, Scene graph, Materials system, Animation system.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ARKit: Is ARKit free to use?
Yes, ARKit is free to use. It is included in Apple's iOS SDK and requires only Xcode and a Mac to start building AR apps. There are no licensing fees or subscription costs.
SourceThree.js: Is Three.js free to use?
Yes. Three.js is released under the MIT license, an open-source license that permits unlimited commercial and personal use with no licensing fees.
SourceARKit: What iOS devices support ARKit?
ARKit is supported on iPhone 6s and later, iPad Pro models, and the latest iPad models. It requires iOS 11 or later. Apple Vision Pro also supports ARKit with enhanced capabilities through visionOS.
SourceThree.js: Does Three.js include physics simulation?
No. Three.js is a rendering library only. Physics, collision detection, and spatial indexing must be implemented with external libraries like Rapier, Ammo, or JoltPhysics.
SourceARKit: Can ARKit work offline?
ARKit can function offline for tracking and scene understanding since these operations run locally on the device. However, multiplayer AR features and cloud-based object detection require internet connectivity.
SourceThree.js: Can I use Three.js for offline development?
Yes. Local development requires a local web server for CORS compliance. You can use npm with a build tool like Vite, or run a local Python server for development.
SourceARKit: Does ARKit integrate with game engines?
Yes, ARKit integrates with Unity through the Unity ARKit Plugin and with Unreal Engine. Developers can also use it with Metal, SceneKit, and Apple's RealityKit framework.
SourceThree.js: Does Three.js support WebXR for VR/AR?
Yes. Three.js documentation includes WebXR APIs for building VR and AR experiences in web browsers.
SourceARKit: What are ARKit's limitations with location-based AR?
ARKit's location-based positioning has accuracy limitations. Image-based positioning is primarily useful in urban areas, and beacon-based navigation provides accuracy of 3-5 meters, which is insufficient for precise AR applications requiring 1-meter accuracy or better.
SourceRelated pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- ARKit vs ARCore
- ARKit vs Meta Quest
- ARKit vs Apple Vision Pro
- ARKit vs Unity AR Foundation
- ARKit vs HTC Vive
- ARKit vs 8th Wall
- ARKit vs Lens Studio
- ARKit vs Vuforia
- ARKit vs A-Frame
- ARKit vs Babylon.js
- ARKit vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- ARKit vs Niantic Lightship
- ARKit vs PlayStation VR2
- ARKit vs Spark AR Studio
- ARKit vs TikTok Effect House
- ARKit vs Gravity Sketch
- ARKit vs Instagram AR Effects
- ARKit vs Magic Leap 2
- Three.js vs ARCore
- Three.js vs Meta Quest
- Three.js vs Apple Vision Pro
- Three.js vs Unity AR Foundation
- Three.js vs HTC Vive
- Three.js vs 8th Wall
- Three.js vs Lens Studio
- Three.js vs Vuforia
- Three.js vs A-Frame
- Three.js vs Babylon.js
- Three.js vs Microsoft HoloLens 2
- Three.js vs Niantic Lightship
- Three.js vs PlayStation VR2
- Three.js vs Spark AR Studio
- Three.js vs TikTok Effect House
- Three.js vs Gravity Sketch
- Three.js vs Instagram AR Effects
- Three.js vs Magic Leap 2


