Software · head to head
ArangoDB vs Ninox
ArangoDB
Software
Multi-model database for graph, document, and search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only ArangoDB has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ArangoDB the company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself; Ninox paid plans are priced per user starting around 25 euros per month, and offline desktop and mobile access is limited to the higher Business and Enterprise tiers
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArangoDB and Ninox actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArangoDB
- Multi-model Support
- AQL Query Language
- Graph Traversals
- Full-text Search
- ACID Transactions
- SmartGraphs
- Satellite Collections
- Foxx Microservices
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that ArangoDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArangoDB
- Graph, document and key-value data in one databasenot Ninox
- Vector and full-text search alongside graph traversalnot Ninox
- Avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured datanot Ninox
- Backing AI applications needing both graph context and vectorsnot Ninox
Ninox
No use cases recorded yet. See the Ninox review.
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArangoDB
- The company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself
- Neither the community licence terms nor cloud pricing are stated on the main site
- arangodb.com redirects to arango.ai
Ninox
- Paid plans are priced per user starting around 25 euros per month, and offline desktop and mobile access is limited to the higher Business and Enterprise tiers
Pricing, plan by plan
ArangoDB
Free- CommunityFree
- All data models
- AQL queries
- Full-text search
- ArangoGraph$99/month
- Managed service
- Graph analytics
- Enterprise support
Ninox
On requestNo published plan breakdown. See the Ninox review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ArangoDB if
- You need multi-model support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want aql query language.
Choose Ninox if
Nothing in the data separates Ninox from ArangoDB on the points above - pick on price and on how each one feels to use.
Questions people ask
- Is ArangoDB or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArangoDB starts at Free and Ninox at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArangoDB or Ninox?
- ArangoDB has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for ArangoDB and On request for Ninox.
- Does ArangoDB or Ninox run on more platforms?
- ArangoDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use ArangoDB for free?
- Yes. ArangoDB has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Ninox starts at On request.
- What is ArangoDB best used for?
- ArangoDB is most often used for graph, document and key-value data in one database, vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal, avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured data, backing ai applications needing both graph context and vectors. Of those, graph, document and key-value data in one database and vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can ArangoDB do that Ninox cannot?
- ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, AQL Query Language, Graph Traversals, Full-text Search.