Databases · head to head
Firebolt vs Ninox

Firebolt
Databases
Sub-second analytics at cloud data warehouse scale
- From
- $1.84/hour
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ninox has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Firebolt compute billed per second on Arm-based processors; small instances still incur measurable costs during idle periods despite auto-stop; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Firebolt and Ninox actually diverge.
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Firebolt
- Sub-second Queries
- Sparse Indexes
- Data Pruning
- Decoupled Storage/Compute
- SQL Support
- Semi-structured Data
- Workload Isolation
- Airflow
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Firebolt does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Firebolt
- Data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirementsnot Ninox
- Real-time business intelligence platforms requiring ACID transactions and snapshot isolationnot Ninox
- Applications needing vector search on analytical data for similarity queriesnot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Firebolt
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Firebolt
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Firebolt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Firebolt
- Compute billed per second on Arm-based processors; small instances still incur measurable costs during idle periods despite auto-stop
- Storage pass-through charged at $0.0264/GB monthly on compressed data; uncompressed storage could exceed this
- Azure deployment currently in Preview status; production recommendations unclear
- Vector indexes limited to float arrays; other data types require alternative indexing strategies
- Free tier credits ($200) limited; no perpetual free tier for production use
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Firebolt
$1.84/hourNo published plan breakdown. See the Firebolt review.
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Firebolt if
- You need sub-second queries.
- You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure preview), Docker, Kubernetes.
- You also want sparse indexes.
Questions people ask
- Is Firebolt or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Firebolt starts at $1.84/hour and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Firebolt or Ninox?
- Ninox has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $1.84/hour for Firebolt and Free for Ninox.
- Does Firebolt or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Firebolt runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure preview), Docker, Kubernetes. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Yes. Ninox has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Firebolt starts at $1.84/hour.
- What is Firebolt best used for?
- Firebolt is most often used for data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirements, real-time business intelligence platforms requiring acid transactions and snapshot isolation, applications needing vector search on analytical data for similarity queries. Of those, data analytics teams running gigabyte-to-petabyte datasets with sub-second query requirements and real-time business intelligence platforms requiring acid transactions and snapshot isolation are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Firebolt do that Ninox cannot?
- Firebolt covers Sub-second Queries, Sparse Indexes, Data Pruning, Decoupled Storage/Compute.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Firebolt: How does Firebolt's compute billing model work?
Firebolt uses per-second billing with scale-to-zero capability. The smallest S tier costs $1.84 per hour with 8 vCPU and 64GB memory, while the largest 4XL tier costs $58.88 per hour with 256 vCPU. Users only pay when compute is running.
SourceNinox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceFirebolt: What is the cost for data storage on Firebolt?
Storage costs $0.0264 per GB per month on object storage, billed as pass-through cost at cloud provider rates.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceFirebolt: What free credits or trial does Firebolt offer new users?
New users receive $200 free credits to get started with the platform.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceFirebolt: Does Firebolt publish pricing for commitment-based discounts?
The pricing FAQ lists a question about commitment-based discounts but does not provide published answers on the pricing page. This requires direct inquiry with sales.
SourceFirebolt: What deployment options does Firebolt offer besides managed service?
Firebolt offers self-hosted open source deployment (unlimited) and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) options in addition to managed service.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Firebolt vs BigQuery
- Firebolt vs Amazon Redshift
- Firebolt vs Airtable
- Firebolt vs Cockroach Labs
- Firebolt vs PostgreSQL
- Firebolt vs Apache Druid
- Firebolt vs DuckDB
- Firebolt vs QuestDB
- Firebolt vs MotherDuck
- Firebolt vs ClickHouse
- Firebolt vs dbt
- Firebolt vs EMQX
- Firebolt vs FaunaDB
- Firebolt vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Firebolt vs Memcached
- Firebolt vs Amazon Aurora
- Firebolt vs Apache Pinot
- Firebolt vs Firestore
- Firebolt vs Apache Airflow
- Firebolt vs Knack
- Firebolt vs Readyset
- Firebolt vs Elasticsearch
- Firebolt vs RabbitMQ
- Firebolt vs Neo4j
- Firebolt vs OpenSearch
- Firebolt vs Qdrant
- Firebolt vs SingleStore
- Firebolt vs Cassandra
- Firebolt vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs BigQuery
- Ninox vs Amazon Redshift
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Apache Druid
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs QuestDB
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs dbt
- Ninox vs EMQX
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Pinot
- Ninox vs Firestore
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

