Databases · head to head
ArangoDB vs QuestDB

ArangoDB
Databases
Multi-model database for graph, document, and search
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ArangoDB the company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ArangoDB and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases), founded (2014).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ArangoDB
- Multi-model Support
- AQL Query Language
- Graph Traversals
- Full-text Search
- ACID Transactions
- SmartGraphs
- Satellite Collections
- Foxx Microservices
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Both cover
- Kafka
- Linux support
- Windows support
- Mac support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ArangoDB
- Graph, document and key-value data in one databasenot QuestDB
- Vector and full-text search alongside graph traversalnot QuestDB
- Avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured datanot QuestDB
- Backing AI applications needing both graph context and vectorsnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot ArangoDB
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot ArangoDB
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not ArangoDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ArangoDB
- The company has repositioned around a wider platform, so ArangoDB is now described as the foundation inside Arango rather than the product itself
- Neither the community licence terms nor cloud pricing are stated on the main site
- arangodb.com redirects to arango.ai
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
ArangoDB
Free- CommunityFree
- All data models
- AQL queries
- Full-text search
- ArangoGraph$99/month
- Managed service
- Graph analytics
- Enterprise support
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ArangoDB if
- You need multi-model support.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web.
- You also want aql query language.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is ArangoDB or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. ArangoDB starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ArangoDB or QuestDB?
- ArangoDB starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does ArangoDB or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- ArangoDB runs on Linux, Windows, Mac, Docker, Web. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use ArangoDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is ArangoDB best used for?
- ArangoDB is most often used for graph, document and key-value data in one database, vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal, avoiding separate stores for related and unstructured data, backing ai applications needing both graph context and vectors. Of those, graph, document and key-value data in one database and vector and full-text search alongside graph traversal are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can ArangoDB do that QuestDB cannot?
- ArangoDB covers Multi-model Support, AQL Query Language, Graph Traversals, Full-text Search. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. Both handle Kafka, Linux support, Windows support, Mac support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ArangoDB: How is ArangoDB priced?
ArangoDB offers Community Edition (free) and Enterprise Edition. Pricing is customized based on deployment model (self-managed, managed cloud AWS/GCP, or OEM/embedded) and customer requirements. Contact Arango for a quote.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceArangoDB: What deployment options does ArangoDB offer?
ArangoDB can be deployed self-managed on customer infrastructure, as managed cloud (Arango Managed Platform on AWS/GCP), or as OEM/embedded solutions.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- ArangoDB vs Cockroach Labs
- ArangoDB vs Airtable
- ArangoDB vs PostgreSQL
- ArangoDB vs Amazon Aurora
- ArangoDB vs RavenDB
- ArangoDB vs CouchDB
- ArangoDB vs Neo4j
- ArangoDB vs Dgraph
- ArangoDB vs Couchbase
- ArangoDB vs CosmosDB
- ArangoDB vs Elasticsearch
- ArangoDB vs Firebolt
- ArangoDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- ArangoDB vs Vitess
- ArangoDB vs Aiven
- ArangoDB vs DynamoDB
- ArangoDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- ArangoDB vs TimescaleDB
- ArangoDB vs Apache Flink
- ArangoDB vs DuckDB
- ArangoDB vs OpenSearch
- ArangoDB vs ClickHouse
- ArangoDB vs NATS
- ArangoDB vs Canary Labs
- ArangoDB vs Chroma
- ArangoDB vs Cloudinary
- ArangoDB vs Convex
- ArangoDB vs Dragonfly
- ArangoDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs RavenDB
- QuestDB vs CouchDB
- QuestDB vs Neo4j
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Couchbase
- QuestDB vs CosmosDB
- QuestDB vs Elasticsearch
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- QuestDB vs Vitess
- QuestDB vs Aiven
- QuestDB vs DynamoDB
- QuestDB vs Microsoft SQL Server
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
