Is Ninox or Qdrant better?

Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, Ninox or Qdrant?

Ninox starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.

Does Ninox or Qdrant run on more platforms?

Ninox runs on Web. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).

Can I use Ninox for free?

Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.

What is Ninox best used for?

Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.

Databases · head to head

Ninox vs Qdrant

Ninox

Databases

The database for teams

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

Qdrant

Databases

High-performance vector database for similarity search and embedding-based retrieval

From: Free
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records; Qdrant free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Ninox and Qdrant actually diverge.

Attributes where Ninox and Qdrant differ
Attribute	Ninox	Qdrant
Platforms	Web	Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming)

Identical on both: starting price (Free), pricing model (freemium), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Ninox

No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Qdrant
Workflow automation and process managementnot Qdrant
Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Qdrant

Qdrant

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) backends for LLM applicationsnot Ninox
Semantic search across large document corporanot Ninox
Multimodal retrieval (text, images, video) for recommendation systemsnot Ninox
Similarity-based product or content recommendationsnot Ninox
Real-time vector indexing for streaming embedding datanot Ninox

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Ninox

Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business

Qdrant

Free tier extremely limited (0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, 4GB disk); suitable only for experiments
Standard and Premium pricing usage-based; specific costs not published; requires calculator or quote
Requires understanding of embeddings and vector search concepts; not suitable for SQL-only teams
Early-stage serverless offering (coming soon) suggests maturity gaps in that deployment model

Pricing, plan by plan

Ninox

Free

FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance

Qdrant

Free

FreeFree
- Single-node cluster
- 0.5 vCPU
- 1GB RAM
Standard$undefined/usage-based
- Dedicated resources
- Flexible scaling
- High availability
Premium$undefined/minimum spend
- SSO and SAML
- Private VPC links
- 99.9% uptime SLA

Which should you pick?

Choose Ninox if

You want to start without paying.

Ninox review

Choose Qdrant if

You want to start without paying.
You work on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).

Qdrant review

Questions people ask

Is Ninox or Qdrant better?: Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and Qdrant at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Ninox or Qdrant?: Ninox starts at Free and Qdrant at Free.
Does Ninox or Qdrant run on more platforms?: Ninox runs on Web. Qdrant runs on Cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure), Kubernetes, Self-hosted, Edge (beta), Serverless (coming).
Can I use Ninox for free?: Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
What is Ninox best used for?: Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what Qdrant is typically brought in for.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?

Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.

Source

Qdrant: Can I use Qdrant for free?

Yes, Qdrant offers a free tier that provides a single node cluster with 0.5 vCPU, 1GB RAM, and 4GB disk space. It includes free cloud inference with selected models and is described as free forever for testing and prototypes.

Source

Ninox: Is Ninox free?

Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.

Source

Qdrant: How is Qdrant Cloud billing calculated?

Billing is calculated based on actual resource usage during each billing period. You are charged hourly for compute (vCPU), memory (GB), storage (GB), backups, and any paid inference tokens used.

Source

Ninox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?

The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.

Source

Qdrant: What happens if I scale beyond the free tier?

The Standard Tier uses the same usage-based billing model as the free tier but adds features like dedicated resources with flexible scaling, highly available setups with backup and disaster recovery, and a 99.5% uptime SLA.

Source

Qdrant: What SLA does Qdrant offer?

The Standard Tier provides 99.5% uptime SLA. The Premium Tier, which requires a minimum spend for enterprises, offers 99.9% uptime SLA along with single sign-on and private VPC links.

Source

Qdrant: Are there dedicated cloud infrastructure options?

Yes, Qdrant offers Hybrid Cloud (runs on your infrastructure) and Private Cloud (complete isolation) options, both with custom pricing that requires contacting the sales team.

Source

Ninox vs Qdrant

Ninox

Qdrant

The short version

Where they differ

What people use each for

Ninox

Qdrant

Where each one falls short

Ninox

Qdrant

Pricing, plan by plan

Ninox

Qdrant

Which should you pick?

Choose Ninox if

Choose Qdrant if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on Ninox

More on Qdrant

Keep looking

Other head to heads