Databases · head to head
CosmosDB vs Ninox

CosmosDB
Databases
Globally distributed, multi-model database service from Azure
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CosmosDB autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CosmosDB and Ninox actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CosmosDB
- Global Distribution
- Multi-model APIs
- Elastic Scaling
- Five Consistency Levels
- SLA-backed Latency
- Automatic Indexing
- Serverless
- Azure Functions
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that CosmosDB does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CosmosDB
- Running a globally distributed multi model database on Azurenot Ninox
- Serving low latency reads and writes from multiple Azure regionsnot Ninox
- Storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed servicenot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot CosmosDB
- Workflow automation and process managementnot CosmosDB
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot CosmosDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CosmosDB
- Autoscale provisioned throughput enforces a minimum of 1,000 RU/s, billed hourly whether or not the database is used
- Provisioned throughput is charged in every region the account is replicated to, so multi region accounts multiply the RU bill
- Storage charges cover data, indexes and backups in each replicated region
- Egress out of Azure and between regions is charged, though ingress is free
- The free allowance is one account per Azure subscription, limited to 1,000 RU/s and 25 GB
- RU/s rates vary by region and are only shown through the pricing calculator rather than a flat published rate
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
CosmosDB
Free- Free TierFree
- 1000 RU/s
- 25GB storage
- First 12 months
- ServerlessFree
- Pay per request
- Auto-scaling
- Event-driven workloads
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose CosmosDB if
- You need global distribution.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Azure.
- You also want multi-model apis.
Questions people ask
- Is CosmosDB or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. CosmosDB starts at Free and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CosmosDB or Ninox?
- CosmosDB starts at Free and Ninox at Free.
- Does CosmosDB or Ninox run on more platforms?
- CosmosDB runs on Web, Azure. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use CosmosDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is CosmosDB best used for?
- CosmosDB is most often used for running a globally distributed multi model database on azure, serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions, storing document, key value and graph data behind a managed service. Of those, running a globally distributed multi model database on azure and serving low latency reads and writes from multiple azure regions are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can CosmosDB do that Ninox cannot?
- CosmosDB covers Global Distribution, Multi-model APIs, Elastic Scaling, Five Consistency Levels.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CosmosDB: Is there a free tier for Azure Cosmos DB?
Yes, Cosmos DB offers a free tier with 1,000 RU/s of throughput and 25 GB of storage per month for the lifetime of the account, available to new accounts.
SourceNinox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceCosmosDB: How is Cosmos DB priced after the free tier?
Cosmos DB uses three billing models: provisioned throughput billed per request unit per second, vCore pricing for certain APIs, or serverless consumption pricing where you pay only for requests processed. Reserved capacity offers 20% discount for one year or 30% for three years.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceCosmosDB: Can I change my pricing model after choosing one?
No. Once you select a compute pricing model and API, they cannot be changed. This choice is permanent for that database.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceCosmosDB: Is there a trial period for Cosmos DB beyond the free tier?
Azure offers a 30-day free trial account for all Azure services. Additionally, Azure AI customers may be eligible for a 90-day free Cosmos DB subscription through the Azure AI Advantage program.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Aurora
- CosmosDB vs Cockroach Labs
- CosmosDB vs Airtable
- CosmosDB vs PostgreSQL
- CosmosDB vs Google Cloud SQL
- CosmosDB vs ArangoDB
- CosmosDB vs DataStax
- CosmosDB vs FaunaDB
- CosmosDB vs Firebolt
- CosmosDB vs turbopuffer
- CosmosDB vs VerneMQ
- CosmosDB vs Vespa
- CosmosDB vs Xata
- CosmosDB vs YugabyteDB
- CosmosDB vs Zilliz
- CosmosDB vs Amazon Redshift
- CosmosDB vs BigQuery
- CosmosDB vs Amazon RDS
- CosmosDB vs Apache Airflow
- CosmosDB vs Knack
- CosmosDB vs Readyset
- CosmosDB vs Elasticsearch
- CosmosDB vs RabbitMQ
- CosmosDB vs Memcached
- CosmosDB vs MotherDuck
- CosmosDB vs Neo4j
- CosmosDB vs OpenSearch
- CosmosDB vs Qdrant
- CosmosDB vs SingleStore
- CosmosDB vs Cassandra
- CosmosDB vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Google Cloud SQL
- Ninox vs ArangoDB
- Ninox vs DataStax
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Firebolt
- Ninox vs turbopuffer
- Ninox vs VerneMQ
- Ninox vs Vespa
- Ninox vs Xata
- Ninox vs YugabyteDB
- Ninox vs Zilliz
- Ninox vs Amazon Redshift
- Ninox vs BigQuery
- Ninox vs Amazon RDS
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

