Databases · head to head
Ninox vs QuestDB

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records; QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Ninox and QuestDB actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that QuestDB does not also cover.
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot QuestDB
- Workflow automation and process managementnot QuestDB
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Ninox
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Ninox
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Ninox
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Ninox or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Ninox starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Ninox or QuestDB?
- Ninox starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Ninox or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Ninox runs on Web. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Ninox best used for?
- Ninox is most often used for no-code database solutions for small to medium teams, workflow automation and process management, customer data and project tracking with custom views. Of those, no-code database solutions for small to medium teams and workflow automation and process management are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Ninox do that QuestDB cannot?
- QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceQuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs TimescaleDB
- Ninox vs Firebolt
- Ninox vs Apache Flink
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs NATS
- Ninox vs Canary Labs
- Ninox vs Chroma
- Ninox vs Cloudinary
- Ninox vs Convex
- Ninox vs Dgraph
- Ninox vs Dragonfly
- Ninox vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Apache Airflow
- QuestDB vs Knack
- QuestDB vs FaunaDB
- QuestDB vs Readyset
- QuestDB vs Elasticsearch
- QuestDB vs RabbitMQ
- QuestDB vs Memcached
- QuestDB vs MotherDuck
- QuestDB vs Neo4j
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs Qdrant
- QuestDB vs SingleStore
- QuestDB vs Cassandra
- QuestDB vs Apache Kafka
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid

