Databases · head to head
Memcached vs Ninox
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Memcached no persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Memcached and Ninox actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Memcached
- In-memory key-value cache
- Multithreaded
- Client-side sharding
- Predictable memory use
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Memcached does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Memcached
- Caching expensive database query results to cut loadnot Ninox
- Session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptablenot Ninox
- Fronting an API whose responses are costly and change slowlynot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Memcached
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Memcached
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Memcached
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Memcached
- No persistence at all: restart a node and its cache is gone, which every design must assume
- No replication or failover, so losing a node loses that share of the cache
- Only simple key-value, with none of the lists, sorted sets or streams Redis offers
- Values are capped at 1MB by default, which surprises teams caching large documents
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Memcached
Free- MemcachedFree
- Full functionality
- Self-hosted
- No usage limits
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Memcached if
- You need in-memory key-value cache.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted.
- You also want multithreaded.
Questions people ask
- Is Memcached or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Memcached starts at Free and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Memcached or Ninox?
- Memcached starts at Free and Ninox at Free.
- Does Memcached or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Memcached runs on Linux, macOS, Windows, Docker, Self-hosted. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use Memcached for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Memcached best used for?
- Memcached is most often used for caching expensive database query results to cut load, session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable, fronting an api whose responses are costly and change slowly. Of those, caching expensive database query results to cut load and session storage where losing sessions on restart is acceptable are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Memcached do that Ninox cannot?
- Memcached covers In-memory key-value cache, Multithreaded, Client-side sharding, Predictable memory use.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Memcached: Is Memcached free?
Yes, open source with no licence fee.
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceMemcached: Memcached or Redis?
Memcached is a pure cache: simpler, multithreaded and very predictable. Redis adds persistence, replication and rich data structures, which is why it is the default choice unless you specifically want a cache and nothing more.
Ninox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceMemcached: Does Memcached persist data?
No. Everything is in memory and lost on restart, by design.
Ninox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Memcached vs Dragonfly
- Memcached vs Valkey
- Memcached vs Readyset
- Memcached vs PostgreSQL
- Memcached vs DuckDB
- Memcached vs DynamoDB
- Memcached vs NATS
- Memcached vs Apache Pulsar
- Memcached vs Presto
- Memcached vs Timeplus
- Memcached vs RabbitMQ
- Memcached vs EMQX
- Memcached vs FaunaDB
- Memcached vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Memcached vs MotherDuck
- Memcached vs Neo4j
- Memcached vs Apache Kafka
- Memcached vs Firestore
- Memcached vs Airtable
- Memcached vs Cockroach Labs
- Memcached vs Amazon Aurora
- Memcached vs Apache Airflow
- Memcached vs Knack
- Memcached vs Elasticsearch
- Memcached vs OpenSearch
- Memcached vs Qdrant
- Memcached vs SingleStore
- Memcached vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Dragonfly
- Ninox vs Valkey
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs DynamoDB
- Ninox vs NATS
- Ninox vs Apache Pulsar
- Ninox vs Presto
- Ninox vs Timeplus
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs EMQX
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs Firestore
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra

