Construction · head to head
ALICE Technologies vs CoConstruct

ALICE Technologies
Construction
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

CoConstruct
Construction
Project management for custom home builders and remodelers
- From
- $99/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ALICE Technologies the output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.; CoConstruct coConstruct does not publish pricing information on their website
- They diverge on capability: ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, CoConstruct covers Project scheduling.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ALICE Technologies and CoConstruct actually diverge.
| Attribute | ALICE Technologies | CoConstruct |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $99/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | Web, Ios, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2005 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ALICE Technologies
- Generative scheduling
- Recipe modelling
- Optioneering
- Schedule recovery
- Resource levelling
- 4D visualisation
- P6 and MS Project import
- Scenario comparison reports
Only in CoConstruct
- Project scheduling
- Estimating
- Client communication
- Selections management
- Financial tracking
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- Zapier
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ALICE Technologies
- A data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers itnot CoConstruct
- A contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committingnot CoConstruct
- A bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimisticnot CoConstruct
- A delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruptionnot CoConstruct
CoConstruct
- Custom home building and remodeling project management for existing CoConstruct accountsnot ALICE Technologies
- Migrating an existing CoConstruct project history onto Buildertrendnot ALICE Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ALICE Technologies
- The output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.
- Pricing is quoted per project or programme with no published rates, so the tool is effectively unavailable to anyone who cannot justify a bespoke enterprise negotiation.
- It only pays back on projects where float has a high monetary value; on a mid-size commercial building the modelling effort exceeds the schedule saving, which is why the customer list skews to data centres, energy and heavy civils.
- A generated schedule still has to be accepted by superintendents and subcontractors who did not build it, and adoption failures are usually social rather than technical: the field runs the plan it believes in.
- The 2026 McKinsey alliance pushes distribution towards consulting-led engagements, which raises the effective cost of entry and makes the direct-purchase path less certain for a contractor that just wants a licence.
CoConstruct
- CoConstruct does not publish pricing information on their website
- Pricing inquiry requires scheduling a demo or contacting sales at 1-800-213-3392
- Website focuses on features and migration to Buildertrend platform rather than pricing
- No pricing tiers or cost breakdowns visible on public pages
Pricing, plan by plan
ALICE Technologies
On request- ALICE$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per programme
- Generative scheduling and optioneering
- Recipe modelling support
CoConstruct
$99/month- Essential$99/month
- Project management
- Scheduling
- Client portal
- Advanced$399/month
- Everything in Essential
- Estimating
- Selections
- Complete$699/month
- Everything in Advanced
- Lead management
- Proposals
Which should you pick?
Choose ALICE Technologies if
- You need generative scheduling.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want recipe modelling.
Choose CoConstruct if
- You need project scheduling.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android.
- You also want estimating.
Questions people ask
- Is ALICE Technologies or CoConstruct better?
- Neither clearly leads. ALICE Technologies starts at On request and CoConstruct at $99/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ALICE Technologies or CoConstruct?
- ALICE Technologies starts at On request and CoConstruct at $99/month.
- Does ALICE Technologies or CoConstruct run on more platforms?
- ALICE Technologies runs on Web, Windows. CoConstruct runs on Web, Ios, Android.
- What is ALICE Technologies best used for?
- ALICE Technologies is most often used for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Of those, a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it and a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing are not what CoConstruct is typically brought in for.
- What can ALICE Technologies do that CoConstruct cannot?
- ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Recipe modelling, Optioneering, Schedule recovery. CoConstruct covers Project scheduling, Estimating, Client communication, Selections management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ALICE Technologies: What does ALICE actually produce?
A set of alternative construction sequences generated from your constraints, scored on duration, cost and resource use, so you can choose rather than accept one plan.
CoConstruct: How much does CoConstruct cost?
CoConstruct does not publish pricing on their website. Interested customers must schedule a demo or contact their sales team at 1-800-213-3392 to receive pricing information.
SourceALICE Technologies: Does it replace Primavera P6?
No. It imports from and exports to P6. P6 remains the contractual schedule of record on most projects.
CoConstruct: What is CoConstruct's pricing model?
CoConstruct's pricing model and pricing tiers are not disclosed on their public website. Pricing details are provided during the demo booking process or through direct contact with sales.
SourceALICE Technologies: Is the company still operating?
Yes. ALICE is active as of 2026 and announced an alliance with McKinsey in April 2026 to deliver AI scheduling to McKinsey clients.
CoConstruct: Does CoConstruct offer pricing information before contacting sales?
No, CoConstruct does not provide pricing details, calculators, or tiered pricing information on their website. All pricing information is available only after scheduling a demo or speaking directly with their sales representatives.
SourceALICE Technologies: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or programme and typically includes modelling and onboarding services.
ALICE Technologies: What size project justifies it?
Projects where a week of schedule has a large monetary value: data centres, energy, industrial and major infrastructure. It is hard to justify on standard commercial building work.
Related pages
More on ALICE Technologies
More on CoConstruct
Other head to heads
- ALICE Technologies vs Procore
- ALICE Technologies vs Primavera P6
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet Construction
- ALICE Technologies vs Reconstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble Pay
- ALICE Technologies vs Assignar
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildots
- ALICE Technologies vs Contractor Foreman
- ALICE Technologies vs eSUB
- ALICE Technologies vs GCPay
- ALICE Technologies vs HammerTech
- ALICE Technologies vs Handoff
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ALICE Technologies vs Houzz Pro
- ALICE Technologies vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ALICE Technologies vs B2W Estimate
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble
- ALICE Technologies vs SketchUp
- ALICE Technologies vs ArchiCAD
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Revit
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildertrend
- ALICE Technologies vs Microsoft Project
- ALICE Technologies vs Kahua
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet
- ALICE Technologies vs Document Crunch
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- CoConstruct vs Procore
- CoConstruct vs Primavera P6
- CoConstruct vs Smartsheet Construction
- CoConstruct vs Reconstruct
- CoConstruct vs Trimble Pay
- CoConstruct vs Assignar
- CoConstruct vs Buildots
- CoConstruct vs Contractor Foreman
- CoConstruct vs eSUB
- CoConstruct vs GCPay
- CoConstruct vs HammerTech
- CoConstruct vs Handoff
- CoConstruct vs HCSS HeavyBid
- CoConstruct vs Houzz Pro
- CoConstruct vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- CoConstruct vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- CoConstruct vs B2W Estimate
- CoConstruct vs Trimble
- CoConstruct vs SketchUp
- CoConstruct vs ArchiCAD
- CoConstruct vs Autodesk Revit
- CoConstruct vs Buildertrend
- CoConstruct vs Microsoft Project
- CoConstruct vs Kahua
- CoConstruct vs Smartsheet
- CoConstruct vs Document Crunch
- CoConstruct vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
