Construction · head to head
ALICE Technologies vs InEight

ALICE Technologies
Construction
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: ALICE Technologies the output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.; InEight a wide set of separate modules, including Control, Contract, Estimate, Schedule, Document and Model, so a working setup means choosing several
- They diverge on capability: ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, InEight covers Project controls.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ALICE Technologies and InEight actually diverge.
| Attribute | ALICE Technologies | InEight |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | $1000/month |
| Pricing model | quote | subscription |
| Founded | Unknown | 2006 |
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, Windows), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ALICE Technologies
- Generative scheduling
- Recipe modelling
- Optioneering
- Schedule recovery
- Resource levelling
- 4D visualisation
- P6 and MS Project import
- Scenario comparison reports
Only in InEight
- Project controls
- Planning and scheduling
- Risk management
- Financial reporting
- Document management
- Oracle EBS
- SAP
- Procore
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ALICE Technologies
- A data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers itnot InEight
- A contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committingnot InEight
- A bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimisticnot InEight
- A delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruptionnot InEight
InEight
- Cost control and forecasting on large capital projectsnot ALICE Technologies
- Estimating and bid preparationnot ALICE Technologies
- Contract and change order managementnot ALICE Technologies
- Field progress and completions trackingnot ALICE Technologies
- Document control across an engineering projectnot ALICE Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ALICE Technologies
- The output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.
- Pricing is quoted per project or programme with no published rates, so the tool is effectively unavailable to anyone who cannot justify a bespoke enterprise negotiation.
- It only pays back on projects where float has a high monetary value; on a mid-size commercial building the modelling effort exceeds the schedule saving, which is why the customer list skews to data centres, energy and heavy civils.
- A generated schedule still has to be accepted by superintendents and subcontractors who did not build it, and adoption failures are usually social rather than technical: the field runs the plan it believes in.
- The 2026 McKinsey alliance pushes distribution towards consulting-led engagements, which raises the effective cost of entry and makes the direct-purchase path less certain for a contractor that just wants a licence.
InEight
- A wide set of separate modules, including Control, Contract, Estimate, Schedule, Document and Model, so a working setup means choosing several
- Prices are not published; enterprise deals are custom and per-user purchasing goes through a separate portal
- Built for capital projects in construction, energy and mining rather than general project work
Pricing, plan by plan
ALICE Technologies
On request- ALICE$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per programme
- Generative scheduling and optioneering
- Recipe modelling support
InEight
$1000/month- Professional$1000/month
- Project controls
- Planning
- Risk management
- EnterpriseFree
- Advanced analytics
- Custom workflows
- Multi-project support
Which should you pick?
Choose ALICE Technologies if
- You need generative scheduling.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want recipe modelling.
Choose InEight if
- You need project controls.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want planning and scheduling.
Questions people ask
- Is ALICE Technologies or InEight better?
- Neither clearly leads. ALICE Technologies starts at On request and InEight at $1000/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ALICE Technologies or InEight?
- ALICE Technologies starts at On request and InEight at $1000/month.
- Does ALICE Technologies or InEight run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Windows, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is ALICE Technologies best used for?
- ALICE Technologies is most often used for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Of those, a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it and a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing are not what InEight is typically brought in for.
- What can ALICE Technologies do that InEight cannot?
- ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Recipe modelling, Optioneering, Schedule recovery. InEight covers Project controls, Planning and scheduling, Risk management, Financial reporting.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ALICE Technologies: What does ALICE actually produce?
A set of alternative construction sequences generated from your constraints, scored on duration, cost and resource use, so you can choose rather than accept one plan.
InEight: How much does InEight cost?
InEight pricing is not published online. Enterprise pricing is determined through consultation with the sales team based on number of users, products selected, and contract length. Per-user pricing for the InEight NOW product allows monthly and annual billing options, but exact figures require contacting sales.
SourceALICE Technologies: Does it replace Primavera P6?
No. It imports from and exports to P6. P6 remains the contractual schedule of record on most projects.
InEight: Does InEight offer a free trial?
InEight offers modular and configurable pricing based on which products customers select. The brief mentions customers can request a demo to discuss pricing, but no specific free trial details are published.
SourceALICE Technologies: Is the company still operating?
Yes. ALICE is active as of 2026 and announced an alliance with McKinsey in April 2026 to deliver AI scheduling to McKinsey clients.
ALICE Technologies: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or programme and typically includes modelling and onboarding services.
ALICE Technologies: What size project justifies it?
Projects where a week of schedule has a large monetary value: data centres, energy, industrial and major infrastructure. It is hard to justify on standard commercial building work.
Related pages
More on ALICE Technologies
Other head to heads
- ALICE Technologies vs Procore
- ALICE Technologies vs Primavera P6
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet Construction
- ALICE Technologies vs Reconstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble Pay
- ALICE Technologies vs Assignar
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildots
- ALICE Technologies vs Contractor Foreman
- ALICE Technologies vs eSUB
- ALICE Technologies vs GCPay
- ALICE Technologies vs HammerTech
- ALICE Technologies vs Handoff
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ALICE Technologies vs Houzz Pro
- ALICE Technologies vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ALICE Technologies vs B2W Estimate
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble
- ALICE Technologies vs SketchUp
- ALICE Technologies vs ArchiCAD
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Revit
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS
- ALICE Technologies vs Openspace
- ALICE Technologies vs Document Crunch
- ALICE Technologies vs Egnyte
- ALICE Technologies vs e-Builder
- ALICE Technologies vs Sitemark
- ALICE Technologies vs Skydio Dock for X10
- ALICE Technologies vs Togal.AI
- ALICE Technologies vs Topcon MAGNET
- ALICE Technologies vs Trunk Tools
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- ALICE Technologies vs Tekla Structures
- InEight vs Procore
- InEight vs Primavera P6
- InEight vs Smartsheet Construction
- InEight vs Reconstruct
- InEight vs Trimble Pay
- InEight vs Assignar
- InEight vs Buildots
- InEight vs Contractor Foreman
- InEight vs eSUB
- InEight vs GCPay
- InEight vs HammerTech
- InEight vs Handoff
- InEight vs HCSS HeavyBid
- InEight vs Houzz Pro
- InEight vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- InEight vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- InEight vs B2W Estimate
- InEight vs Trimble
- InEight vs SketchUp
- InEight vs ArchiCAD
- InEight vs Autodesk Revit
- InEight vs HCSS
- InEight vs Openspace
- InEight vs Document Crunch
- InEight vs Egnyte
- InEight vs e-Builder
- InEight vs Sitemark
- InEight vs Skydio Dock for X10
- InEight vs Togal.AI
- InEight vs Topcon MAGNET
- InEight vs Trunk Tools
- InEight vs Autodesk Construction Cloud
- InEight vs Tekla Structures

