Construction · head to head
ALICE Technologies vs Fieldwire

ALICE Technologies
Construction
Generative construction scheduling that produces and compares millions of build sequences
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Fieldwire
Construction
Field management software for construction teams
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Fieldwire has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: ALICE Technologies the output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.; Fieldwire free tier limited to 5 team members and 3 projects maximum
- They diverge on capability: ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Fieldwire covers Task management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which ALICE Technologies and Fieldwire actually diverge.
| Attribute | ALICE Technologies | Fieldwire |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, Windows | iOS, Android |
| Founded | Unknown | 2013 |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Construction).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in ALICE Technologies
- Generative scheduling
- Recipe modelling
- Optioneering
- Schedule recovery
- Resource levelling
- 4D visualisation
- P6 and MS Project import
- Scenario comparison reports
Only in Fieldwire
- Task management
- Digital blueprints
- Punch lists
- Inspections
- Photo documentation
- Procore
- Autodesk BIM 360
- Box
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
ALICE Technologies
- A data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers itnot Fieldwire
- A contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committingnot Fieldwire
- A bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimisticnot Fieldwire
- A delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruptionnot Fieldwire
Fieldwire
- Construction task tracking and field coordinationnot ALICE Technologies
- Punch list management on mobile devicesnot ALICE Technologies
- Project documentation organisationnot ALICE Technologies
- Field team communicationnot ALICE Technologies
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
ALICE Technologies
- The output is only as good as the recipes, and building accurate recipes is specialist modelling work most contractors cannot staff, so engagements depend on ALICE or a consultant doing it, which turns software into a services contract.
- Pricing is quoted per project or programme with no published rates, so the tool is effectively unavailable to anyone who cannot justify a bespoke enterprise negotiation.
- It only pays back on projects where float has a high monetary value; on a mid-size commercial building the modelling effort exceeds the schedule saving, which is why the customer list skews to data centres, energy and heavy civils.
- A generated schedule still has to be accepted by superintendents and subcontractors who did not build it, and adoption failures are usually social rather than technical: the field runs the plan it believes in.
- The 2026 McKinsey alliance pushes distribution towards consulting-led engagements, which raises the effective cost of entry and makes the direct-purchase path less certain for a contractor that just wants a licence.
Fieldwire
- Free tier limited to 5 team members and 3 projects maximum
- Basic plan limited to 100 sheets
- Advanced features (RFIs, submittals, change orders, budget management) restricted to higher tiers
- BIM viewer availability gated to Business tier and above
Pricing, plan by plan
ALICE Technologies
On request- ALICE$undefined/year
- Quoted per project or per programme
- Generative scheduling and optioneering
- Recipe modelling support
Fieldwire
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Fieldwire review.
Which should you pick?
Choose ALICE Technologies if
- You need generative scheduling.
- You work on Web, Windows.
- You also want recipe modelling.
Choose Fieldwire if
- You need task management.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android.
- You also want digital blueprints.
Questions people ask
- Is ALICE Technologies or Fieldwire better?
- Neither clearly leads. ALICE Technologies starts at On request and Fieldwire at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, ALICE Technologies or Fieldwire?
- Fieldwire has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for ALICE Technologies and Free for Fieldwire.
- Does ALICE Technologies or Fieldwire run on more platforms?
- ALICE Technologies runs on Web, Windows. Fieldwire runs on iOS, Android.
- Can I use Fieldwire for free?
- Yes. Fieldwire has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. ALICE Technologies starts at On request.
- What is ALICE Technologies best used for?
- ALICE Technologies is most often used for a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it, a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing, a bid team wanting to submit a shorter programme than competitors while proving to the client that the resource profile is achievable rather than optimistic, a delay claim where the contractor must demonstrate to a client or adjudicator what the schedule would have looked like without a specific disruption. Of those, a data centre programme where six months of earlier energisation is worth more than the entire construction management budget, and the owner wants evidence that a proposed sequence change actually delivers it and a contractor facing liquidated damages that must decide between a second shift, a second crane and resequencing, and needs the cost and duration consequence of each before committing are not what Fieldwire is typically brought in for.
- What can ALICE Technologies do that Fieldwire cannot?
- ALICE Technologies covers Generative scheduling, Recipe modelling, Optioneering, Schedule recovery. Fieldwire covers Task management, Digital blueprints, Punch lists, Inspections.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
ALICE Technologies: What does ALICE actually produce?
A set of alternative construction sequences generated from your constraints, scored on duration, cost and resource use, so you can choose rather than accept one plan.
Fieldwire: Is there a free version of Fieldwire?
Yes. Fieldwire's Basic plan is free for up to 5 users, 3 projects, and 100 sheets. It includes core features like plan viewing, task management, specifications, files, photos, and checklists.
SourceALICE Technologies: Does it replace Primavera P6?
No. It imports from and exports to P6. P6 remains the contractual schedule of record on most projects.
Fieldwire: What are the per-user costs for paid Fieldwire plans?
Pro costs $39 per user per month (annual billing), Business costs $64 per user per month, and Business Plus costs $89 per user per month. All paid plans include unlimited sheets and unlimited projects regardless of plan tier.
SourceALICE Technologies: Is the company still operating?
Yes. ALICE is active as of 2026 and announced an alliance with McKinsey in April 2026 to deliver AI scheduling to McKinsey clients.
Fieldwire: How many users can I have on a free Fieldwire account?
The Basic plan (free) supports up to 5 users with 3 projects. Pro and higher plans scale without hard user limits; you pay per user added.
SourceALICE Technologies: How much does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted per project or programme and typically includes modelling and onboarding services.
Fieldwire: Does Fieldwire offer discounts for annual billing?
The pricing page lists annual billing rates for the standard plans shown. Custom contracts are available through sales with options for unlimited users, tailored training, dedicated success teams, API access, and single sign-on.
SourceALICE Technologies: What size project justifies it?
Projects where a week of schedule has a large monetary value: data centres, energy, industrial and major infrastructure. It is hard to justify on standard commercial building work.
Fieldwire: What is included in the Business Plus plan that isn't in lower tiers?
Business Plus ($89/user/month) adds RFIs, submittals, change orders, and budget management features compared to the Business tier. Business itself adds custom forms, app integrations, BIM viewer, and custom task fields compared to Pro.
SourceRelated pages
More on ALICE Technologies
Other head to heads
- ALICE Technologies vs Procore
- ALICE Technologies vs Primavera P6
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet Construction
- ALICE Technologies vs Reconstruct
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble Pay
- ALICE Technologies vs Assignar
- ALICE Technologies vs Buildots
- ALICE Technologies vs Contractor Foreman
- ALICE Technologies vs eSUB
- ALICE Technologies vs GCPay
- ALICE Technologies vs HammerTech
- ALICE Technologies vs Handoff
- ALICE Technologies vs HCSS HeavyBid
- ALICE Technologies vs Houzz Pro
- ALICE Technologies vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- ALICE Technologies vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- ALICE Technologies vs B2W Estimate
- ALICE Technologies vs Trimble
- ALICE Technologies vs Dalux
- ALICE Technologies vs Autodesk Revit
- ALICE Technologies vs SketchUp
- ALICE Technologies vs ArchiCAD
- ALICE Technologies vs Raken
- ALICE Technologies vs PlanSwift
- ALICE Technologies vs Microsoft Project
- ALICE Technologies vs Billd
- ALICE Technologies vs Bridgit Bravo
- ALICE Technologies vs Builderbox
- ALICE Technologies vs PlanGrid
- ALICE Technologies vs Smartsheet
- Fieldwire vs Procore
- Fieldwire vs Primavera P6
- Fieldwire vs Smartsheet Construction
- Fieldwire vs Reconstruct
- Fieldwire vs Trimble Pay
- Fieldwire vs Assignar
- Fieldwire vs Buildots
- Fieldwire vs Contractor Foreman
- Fieldwire vs eSUB
- Fieldwire vs GCPay
- Fieldwire vs HammerTech
- Fieldwire vs Handoff
- Fieldwire vs HCSS HeavyBid
- Fieldwire vs Houzz Pro
- Fieldwire vs iAuditor by SafetyCulture
- Fieldwire vs Oracle Textura Payment Management
- Fieldwire vs B2W Estimate
- Fieldwire vs Trimble
- Fieldwire vs Dalux
- Fieldwire vs Autodesk Revit
- Fieldwire vs SketchUp
- Fieldwire vs ArchiCAD
- Fieldwire vs Raken
- Fieldwire vs PlanSwift
- Fieldwire vs Microsoft Project
- Fieldwire vs Billd
- Fieldwire vs Bridgit Bravo
- Fieldwire vs Builderbox
- Fieldwire vs PlanGrid
- Fieldwire vs Smartsheet
