Software · head to head
Achievers vs Clay
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Achievers pricing is not published and requires a demo; Clay two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- They diverge on capability: Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Clay covers Data enrichment.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Achievers and Clay actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Unknown).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Achievers
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points-based rewards
- Marketplace rewards
- Pulse surveys
- Employee connections
- Analytics dashboard
- Values alignment
Only in Clay
- Data enrichment
- Contact management
- Workflow automation
- Integration
- API access
- Salesforce
- HubSpot
- Zapier
Both cover
- Slack
- GDPR
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Achievers
- Employee recognitionnot Clay
- Rewards programnot Clay
- Engagement measurementnot Clay
- Culture buildingnot Clay
- Retention improvementnot Clay
Clay
- Enriching prospect lists from multiple data providers in one tablenot Achievers
- Building automated outbound research and outreach workflowsnot Achievers
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Achievers
- Pricing is not published and requires a demo
- Aimed at mid-market and enterprise organisations rather than small teams
- Sold as separate named modules, Recognize, Reward and Celebrate, so a full programme means more than one line on the quote
Clay
- Two separate meters run at once, actions and data credits, and a plan can exhaust either independently
- Data credit overage is sold at a 30% premium over the plan rate, so exceeding the allowance costs more per unit than planning for it
- The free plan allows 500 actions, 100 data credits and 200 rows per table
- The entry paid plan starts at $167 a month, and both paid prices are starting figures rather than fixed
- The free plan cannot buy overage at all, so hitting the limit stops work rather than billing for it
Pricing, plan by plan
Achievers
On request- Recognize$undefined/month
- Peer-to-peer recognition
- Manager recognition
- Points & rewards
- Listen$undefined/month
- Engagement surveys
- Pulse surveys
- Analytics
- Connect$undefined/month
- Employee connections
- Interest groups
- Events
Clay
On request- Pricing upon request$undefined/month
- Data enrichment
- Integration
- Support
Which should you pick?
Choose Achievers if
- You need peer-to-peer recognition.
- You work on Web, Ios, Android, Api.
- You also want manager recognition.
Questions people ask
- Is Achievers or Clay better?
- Neither clearly leads. Achievers starts at On request and Clay at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Achievers or Clay?
- Achievers starts at On request and Clay at On request.
- Does Achievers or Clay run on more platforms?
- Achievers runs on Web, Ios, Android, Api. Clay runs on Web.
- What is Achievers best used for?
- Achievers is most often used for employee recognition, rewards program, engagement measurement, culture building. Of those, employee recognition and rewards program are not what Clay is typically brought in for.
- What can Achievers do that Clay cannot?
- Achievers covers Peer-to-peer recognition, Manager recognition, Points-based rewards, Marketplace rewards. Clay covers Data enrichment, Contact management, Workflow automation, Integration. Both handle Slack, GDPR.
Related pages
Keep looking
Other head to heads
- Achievers vs BambooHR
- Achievers vs Workday
- Achievers vs Culture Amp
- Achievers vs Freshteam
- Achievers vs TINYpulse
- Achievers vs Zoho People
- Achievers vs 15Five
- Achievers vs Bonusly
- Achievers vs CharlieHR
- Achievers vs Kudos
- Achievers vs Lattice
- Achievers vs Personio
- Achievers vs Breathe HR
- Achievers vs Darwinbox
- Achievers vs Employment Hero
- Achievers vs greytHR
- Achievers vs HiBob
- Achievers vs Homebase
- Achievers vs Outreach
- Achievers vs Gong
- Achievers vs Seismic
- Achievers vs Pipedrive
- Achievers vs HubSpot
- Achievers vs Salesforce
- Achievers vs Bitrix24
- Achievers vs Capsule
- Achievers vs Clari
- Achievers vs Freshsales
- Achievers vs Streak
- Achievers vs Zoho CRM
- Achievers vs Affinity
- Achievers vs Agile CRM
- Achievers vs Apollo.io
- Achievers vs Capsule CRM
- Achievers vs Clearbit
- Achievers vs Cloze
- Clay vs BambooHR
- Clay vs Workday
- Clay vs Culture Amp
- Clay vs Freshteam
- Clay vs TINYpulse
- Clay vs Zoho People
- Clay vs 15Five
- Clay vs Bonusly
- Clay vs CharlieHR
- Clay vs Kudos
- Clay vs Lattice
- Clay vs Personio
- Clay vs Breathe HR
- Clay vs Darwinbox
- Clay vs Employment Hero
- Clay vs greytHR
- Clay vs HiBob
- Clay vs Homebase
- Clay vs Outreach
- Clay vs Gong
- Clay vs Seismic
- Clay vs Pipedrive
- Clay vs HubSpot
- Clay vs Salesforce
- Clay vs Bitrix24
- Clay vs Capsule
- Clay vs Clari
- Clay vs Freshsales
- Clay vs Streak
- Clay vs Zoho CRM
- Clay vs Affinity
- Clay vs Agile CRM
- Clay vs Apollo.io
- Clay vs Capsule CRM
- Clay vs Clearbit
- Clay vs Cloze


