Activitivs
Temporal


Temporal: Temporal if durable code-defined workflows suit better than modelled BPMN processes.

Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
As of 31 August 2026, Activiti is free to use. The Java BPMN engine that both Camunda and Flowable forked away from. Softwr lists it under Automation Integration. Activiti is made by Hyland Software, available on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.
Overview
Activiti is a lightweight BPMN 2.0 process engine for Java, embeddable as a library or deployed as a service. Activiti 7 and 8 restructured the project as Activiti Cloud, a set of Spring Boot services designed for Kubernetes: a runtime bundle holding the engine, a query service, an audit service and a cloud gateway. It remains Apache 2.0, which is now a meaningful point of difference given that Camunda moved to a source-available licence. The history explains the present. Activiti began at Alfresco and produced two significant forks: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in October 2016, when a group of the core developers left Alfresco. Each fork took contributors with it. Alfresco was later acquired by Hyland, so Activiti is now a Hyland-sponsored project. Build activity continues, with release candidate artefacts published through 2026, but the last stable 8.x release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, which is a long gap for a project whose competitors ship regularly. Who actually buys it: organisations already on Alfresco or Hyland content services, where Activiti is the embedded workflow engine, and Java teams that need an Apache-licensed BPMN engine and are unwilling to accept Camunda’s licensing or Flowable’s commercial editions. The honest assessment is that for a greenfield project the developer ecosystem, documentation and hiring pool all favour Flowable or Camunda, and choosing Activiti means accepting a smaller support surface in exchange for licence terms.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Activiti.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Temporal: Temporal if durable code-defined workflows suit better than modelled BPMN processes.


Conductor: Conductor for language-agnostic orchestration with an active community and its own UI.


n8n: n8n if the requirement is visual integration automation rather than an embeddable Java BPMN engine.
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Activiti
Free
Capabilities
BPMN 2.0 engine
Standards-compliant process execution embeddable as a Java library
Activiti Cloud
Spring Boot services for runtime, query, audit and gateway on Kubernetes
Modeler
Web-based BPMN modelling for process definitions and forms
Java and REST APIs
Process control from application code or over HTTP
Pluggable persistence
Process state in any supported relational database
Identity integration
Keycloak-based authentication and role mapping in the cloud distribution
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.
Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.
Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.
Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.
Keep looking
Durable execution platform for fault-tolerant workflows.
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
Long-running Java BPMN engine, now developed inside Apache KIE with commercial support from IBM
BPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source
Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
Cloud-native business automation for Quarkus, now an Apache KIE component
Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
Open source ELT built on the Singer tap and target ecosystem, configured as code
Automate tasks across cloud and on-premises apps
Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier
Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
BPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Activiti, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Industrial DataOps middleware that models and contextualises OT data before it reaches IT systems
Per site per yearManaged Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier
Per credit by task hourEmbedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
Per month by API call volumeTransactional message queuing for systems where a lost message is a lost payment
Per virtual processor core per monthPostgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
Per month by task run count