Softwr
Activiti logo

Activiti

Apache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked

As of 31 August 2026, Activiti is free to use. The Java BPMN engine that both Camunda and Flowable forked away from. Softwr lists it under Automation Integration. Activiti is made by Hyland Software, available on Linux, Windows, Docker, Kubernetes.

Overview

What Activiti does

Activiti is a lightweight BPMN 2.0 process engine for Java, embeddable as a library or deployed as a service. Activiti 7 and 8 restructured the project as Activiti Cloud, a set of Spring Boot services designed for Kubernetes: a runtime bundle holding the engine, a query service, an audit service and a cloud gateway. It remains Apache 2.0, which is now a meaningful point of difference given that Camunda moved to a source-available licence. The history explains the present. Activiti began at Alfresco and produced two significant forks: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in October 2016, when a group of the core developers left Alfresco. Each fork took contributors with it. Alfresco was later acquired by Hyland, so Activiti is now a Hyland-sponsored project. Build activity continues, with release candidate artefacts published through 2026, but the last stable 8.x release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, which is a long gap for a project whose competitors ship regularly. Who actually buys it: organisations already on Alfresco or Hyland content services, where Activiti is the embedded workflow engine, and Java teams that need an Apache-licensed BPMN engine and are unwilling to accept Camunda’s licensing or Flowable’s commercial editions. The honest assessment is that for a greenfield project the developer ecosystem, documentation and hiring pool all favour Flowable or Camunda, and choosing Activiti means accepting a smaller support surface in exchange for licence terms.

What people use it for

  • An Alfresco or Hyland content services deployment where Activiti is already the embedded workflow engine
  • A Java application that needs to embed a BPMN engine as a library under a permissive licence
  • An organisation that has ruled out Camunda 8 on licence grounds and needs an Apache 2.0 alternative
  • Document-centric approval workflows where the process engine sits inside the content management stack rather than beside it

The honest half

Where it falls short

Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Activiti.

  • The last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024, and while release candidate builds continue, a two-year gap between stable versions is a real risk signal for a production dependency.
  • Both Camunda and Flowable forked away and took large parts of the contributor base with them, so the community, tutorials and third-party tooling around Activiti are much thinner than around either fork.
  • Commercial support is only realistically available by buying Hyland Alfresco subscriptions, so there is no way to pay for Activiti support on its own.
  • Activiti Cloud imposes a distributed architecture of several Spring Boot services plus Keycloak, which is heavy for teams who simply wanted an embeddable engine.
  • Documentation is dated and partly split between old Alfresco sites and Hyland Connect, and the transition between Activiti 6, 7 and 8 architectures makes much of the older material actively misleading.

Cross-shopped

What people choose instead of Activiti

Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.

  • Activiti logo
    Activiti
    vs
    Temporal logo
    Temporal

    Temporal: Temporal if durable code-defined workflows suit better than modelled BPMN processes.

  • Activiti logo
    Activiti
    vs
    Conductor logo
    Conductor

    Conductor: Conductor for language-agnostic orchestration with an active community and its own UI.

  • Activiti logo
    Activiti
    vs
    n8n logo
    n8n

    n8n: n8n if the requirement is visual integration automation rather than an embeddable Java BPMN engine.

Pricing

What Activiti costs

Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.

Activiti

Free

  • Apache 2.0 licence
  • Embeddable Java library or Activiti Cloud services
  • No usage limits
  • Community support via GitHub
  • Commercial support only through Hyland Alfresco subscriptions

Capabilities

Features

  • BPMN 2.0 engine

    Standards-compliant process execution embeddable as a Java library

  • Activiti Cloud

    Spring Boot services for runtime, query, audit and gateway on Kubernetes

  • Modeler

    Web-based BPMN modelling for process definitions and forms

  • Java and REST APIs

    Process control from application code or over HTTP

  • Pluggable persistence

    Process state in any supported relational database

  • Identity integration

    Keycloak-based authentication and role mapping in the cloud distribution

Answered, with sources

Questions people ask

Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.

Is Activiti still maintained?

Yes, Hyland continues to publish builds, but the last stable release was 8.2.0 in January 2024.

What is its relationship to Camunda and Flowable?

Both are forks of Activiti: Camunda in 2013 and Flowable in 2016, when core developers left Alfresco.

What licence is it?

Apache 2.0, which distinguishes it from Camunda 8’s source-available licence.

Should I choose Activiti for a new project?

Only if the Apache licence or an existing Alfresco deployment is decisive. Flowable and Camunda have far larger ecosystems.

Share

Keep looking

Where to go from Activiti

Best Automation Integration software for

Compare Activiti with

Other Automation Integration software

  • The fair-code workflow automation tool

    Free, then €20/mo12 researched notes
  • Durable execution platform for fault-tolerant workflows.

    Free, then $100/mo12 researched notes
  • Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • Long-running Java BPMN engine, now developed inside Apache KIE with commercial support from IBM

    Open source12 researched notes
  • BPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source

    Pricing on request12 researched notes
  • Open source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0

    Free, then $50/mo13 researched notes
  • Cloud-native business automation for Quarkus, now an Apache KIE component

    Open source12 researched notes
  • The open-source ELT platform

    Free plan13 researched notes
  • Open-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps

    Free, then $120/mo10 researched notes
  • Open source ELT built on the Singer tap and target ecosystem, configured as code

    Open source12 researched notes
  • Automate your work across 7,000+ app integrations

    Free, then $19.99/mo15 researched notes
  • The reverse ETL infrastructure for data activation

    Free plan11 researched notes
  • Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • The Platform for Production-Ready Agentic Workflows

    Free, then $590/yr9 researched notes
  • Build AI Agents, Visually

    Free, then $35/mo8 researched notes
  • Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

    Free plan12 researched notes
  • BPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source

    Pricing on request12 researched notes

Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Activiti, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.

More on Activiti

Best Automation Integration software alternatives

Industrial DataOps middleware that models and contextualises OT data before it reaches IT systems

Per site per year

Apache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti

quote

Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier

Per credit by task hour

Embedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product

Per month by API call volume

Transactional message queuing for systems where a lost message is a lost payment

Per virtual processor core per month

Postgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go

Per month by task run count

BPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source

quote

Compare Activiti with alternatives