Orkesvs
Temporal
Temporal: If you prefer defining workflows in code and want the larger community and hiring pool
Orkes
Commercial Conductor, now the maintainer of the workflow engine Netflix archived
As of 31 August 2026, Orkes is free to use. The company behind Conductor, the workflow orchestration engine built at Netflix, which Netflix archived at the end of 2023 and Orkes then took over as maintainer. Softwr lists it under Automation Integration. Orkes is available on Linux, Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud.
Overview
What Orkes does
Orkes sells Orkes Conductor, a commercial distribution of the Conductor workflow orchestration engine. Workflows are defined as JSON or through a visual builder, composed of tasks executed by workers written in Java, Python, Go, C#, JavaScript or Clojure, with support for forks and joins, dynamic tasks, sub-workflows, human-in-the-loop steps, event handlers and LLM tasks with prompt templates and vector database integration. Orkes adds authentication and RBAC, secrets management, scheduling, monitoring, high availability operations and a managed cloud or customer-hosted deployment. The governance change is what a buyer should weigh. Conductor was created and open sourced at Netflix, and in December 2023 Netflix archived its repository. Orkes, founded by former Netflix engineers who worked on it, took over stewardship of the open source project under Apache 2.0 at conductor-oss. The engine did not die, but the guarantee that it was maintained by a large company using it at scale for its own purposes did. Anyone who adopted Conductor because Netflix stood behind it should reassess on the current facts. Orkes offers a free Developer Edition with all Conductor OSS features plus enterprise capabilities for prototyping, explicitly unsuitable for production because rate limits and resources can change, and an Enterprise tier with quoted pricing, SLAs to 99.99 per cent, dedicated technical account managers and either Orkes-hosted or customer-hosted deployment. Buyers are teams running microservice orchestration or AI agent workflows who want a language-agnostic engine with a visual definition format.
What people use it for
- A microservices estate that needs orchestration across services written in different languages without a shared SDK
- A team already running Conductor OSS that wants a supported distribution now that Netflix has stopped maintaining it
- An AI platform composing agent steps, model calls and vector lookups as versioned workflow definitions
- A business process needing human approval steps interleaved with automated service calls
The honest half
Where it falls short
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Orkes.
- Netflix archived the Conductor repository in December 2023 and Orkes took over maintenance, so the large-company backing that justified many original adoptions no longer exists.
- Enterprise pricing is entirely unpublished, and the only free option is explicitly a prototyping sandbox whose limits can change at any time, so there is no supported low-cost entry point.
- Self-hosting Conductor OSS in production means operating the engine plus its persistence and indexing dependencies, typically Postgres or Cassandra with Elasticsearch, which is a substantial platform commitment.
- JSON workflow definitions are language agnostic but verbose and awkward to test, and teams accustomed to defining workflows in code find them a step backwards in developer experience.
- Orkes is a small company whose commercial future is tied to a single open source project it also maintains, which concentrates both vendor and project risk in the same place.
Cross-shopped
What people choose instead of Orkes
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.
- OrkesvsApache Airflow
Apache Airflow: If the workload is scheduled data pipelines rather than service orchestration
- Orkesvsn8n
n8n: If the orchestration is integration between SaaS tools rather than microservices
Pricing
What Orkes costs
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Developer Edition
Free
- All Conductor OSS features plus enterprise capabilities
- Sandbox for prototyping only
- Rate limits and resources may change without notice
- Community support and no production SLA
Enterprise
On request
- Availability SLA up to 99.99%
- Orkes-hosted or customer-hosted deployment
- Dedicated technical account manager
- Security features, RBAC and architectural guidance
- No pricing published
Capabilities
Features
JSON workflow definitions
Declarative workflows versioned as data rather than embedded in code
Polyglot workers
Task workers in Java, Python, Go, C#, JavaScript and Clojure
Visual workflow builder
Graphical composition and debugging of workflow definitions
AI and LLM tasks
Prompt templates, model integrations and vector database tasks as workflow steps
Human tasks
Steps that pause for human approval or input with forms
Event handlers
Workflows triggered and advanced by external events and messages
RBAC and secrets
Access control, tagging and secret management on top of the OSS engine
Hosted or self-hosted
Orkes-managed cloud, customer VPC, or your own infrastructure
Answered, with sources
Questions people ask
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
Does Netflix still maintain Conductor?
No. Netflix archived its repository in December 2023. The open source project continues at conductor-oss under Apache 2.0, maintained by Orkes.
Is there a free production tier?
No. The Developer Edition is a sandbox that the vendor states is unsuitable for production. Self-hosting Conductor OSS is the free production route.
What does Enterprise cost?
Nothing is published; it is quoted by deployment and support requirements.
How does it compare with Temporal?
Conductor uses declarative JSON workflow definitions and external workers; Temporal defines workflows in code. Temporal has the larger community.
Keep looking
Where to go from Orkes
- Orkes alternativesEvery product people weigh against it
- Orkes pricingPlans, floors and what the tiers exclude
- Orkes badgesWhich rules it meets, and the figure behind each
- All Automation Integration softwareThe full category
- Best Automation Integration softwareThe shortlist, and how it was cut
Best Automation Integration software for
Compare Orkes with
- Temporal
- n8n
- Hatchet
- Autonoly
- Meltano
- Camunda
- Flowable
- Nango
- Airbyte
- Windmill
- Activiti
- jBPM
- Cyclr
- Hightouch
- Jitterbit
- Pipedream
- Tray.io
- Nango
Other Automation Integration software
Durable execution platform for fault-tolerant workflows.
Free, then $100/mo12 researched notesPostgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
Free, then $500/mo12 researched notesAI agents that build and run automation workflows from plain-English prompts
Free, then $29/mo13 researched notesOpen source ELT built on the Singer tap and target ecosystem, configured as code
Open source12 researched notesBPMN process orchestration engine, now source-available rather than open source
Pricing on request12 researched notesApache 2.0 BPMN, CMMN and DMN engine from the team that originally built Activiti
Free plan12 researched notesOpen source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
Free, then $50/mo13 researched notesOpen-source developer platform for building scripts, workflows, and internal apps
Free, then $120/mo10 researched notesApache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
Open source12 researched notesLong-running Java BPMN engine, now developed inside Apache KIE with commercial support from IBM
Open source12 researched notesEmbedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
From $1,595/mo12 researched notesOpen source unified API and OAuth infrastructure for product integrations, licensed under Elastic License 2.0
Free, then $50/mo13 researched notes
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Orkes, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
More on Orkes
Orkes alternatives
What people switch to, and what they give up
Orkes pricing
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Compare Orkes
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Orkes badge
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Best Automation Integration software alternatives
Industrial DataOps middleware that models and contextualises OT data before it reaches IT systems
Per site per year
Managed Apache Flink and Debezium with credit-based pricing and a free tier
Per credit by task hourEmbedded integration platform that SaaS vendors ship inside their own product
Per month by API call volumeApache 2.0 BPMN engine under Hyland, from which Flowable and Camunda were forked
Open source, no licence fee
Transactional message queuing for systems where a lost message is a lost payment
Per virtual processor core per monthPostgres-backed distributed task queue and workflow engine for Python, TypeScript and Go
Per month by task run count