Healthcare · head to head
Annalise.ai vs Ibex Medical Analytics

Annalise.ai
Healthcare
Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Ibex Medical Analytics
Healthcare
Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Annalise.ai the United States cleared indication covers roughly ten findings for triage and notification, far fewer than the model reports, so a buyer who evaluates the full multi-finding output and then contracts in the United States gets a much narrower cleared use.; Ibex Medical Analytics the European IVDR indication is broader than the United States position, where some applications operate under laboratory developed test arrangements rather than FDA authorisation, which determines whether AI output can influence a signed report.
- They diverge on capability: Annalise.ai covers Annalise Enterprise CXR, Ibex Medical Analytics covers Ibex Breast Suite.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Annalise.ai and Ibex Medical Analytics actually diverge.
| Attribute | Annalise.ai | Ibex Medical Analytics |
|---|
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), platforms (Web, Cloud, On-premise), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Healthcare).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Annalise.ai
- Annalise Enterprise CXR
- Annalise Enterprise CTB
- Triage and notification
- Worklist reprioritisation
- Localisation overlays
- Confidence output
- PACS-native deployment
- On-premise or cloud inference
Only in Ibex Medical Analytics
- Ibex Breast Suite
- Ibex Prostate
- Ibex Gastric
- Second read safety net
- Prescreening triage
- Heatmap localisation
- Quality reporting
- Scanner-agnostic ingestion
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Annalise.ai
- An emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnestnot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human readsnot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A screening programme in Europe where the broader CE marked decision support indication, rather than the narrow United States triage clearance, is what is being deployednot Ibex Medical Analytics
- A radiology department building an AI governance programme that wants one vendor covering both chest radiograph and head CT rather than contracting two separate algorithm suppliersnot Ibex Medical Analytics
Ibex Medical Analytics
- A histopathology department that cannot recruit and wants an automated safety net on every prostate and breast biopsy before sign outnot Annalise.ai
- A private laboratory group standardising Gleason grading across pathologists with known interobserver variabilitynot Annalise.ai
- A service digitising histopathology that needs a clinical governance argument to justify the scanning programme to its boardnot Annalise.ai
- A gastrointestinal service wanting Helicobacter pylori detection automated so pathologists spend their time on the neoplastic casesnot Annalise.ai
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Annalise.ai
- The United States cleared indication covers roughly ten findings for triage and notification, far fewer than the model reports, so a buyer who evaluates the full multi-finding output and then contracts in the United States gets a much narrower cleared use.
- Triage AI reprioritises a worklist but does not change clinical decisions on its own, so departments that do not redesign how urgent studies are picked up see no measurable improvement in time to treatment.
- Published validation is largely reader study evidence on detection of individual findings; prospective evidence of shorter time to treatment in routine emergency care is thin.
- The Annalise brand is being migrated under the Harrison.ai name for the critical care offering, which creates ambiguity in multi-year contracts about what product name is actually being supported.
- A high finding count raises the alert burden, and departments report that low prevalence findings generate false positives that erode radiologist trust unless the alerting thresholds are tuned locally.
Ibex Medical Analytics
- The European IVDR indication is broader than the United States position, where some applications operate under laboratory developed test arrangements rather than FDA authorisation, which determines whether AI output can influence a signed report.
- It requires a fully digitised histopathology workflow, and slide scanning, storage and validation typically cost several times the algorithm licence.
- Running it as a second read safety net adds a discrepancy resolution workload that departments consistently underestimate, and someone senior has to adjudicate every flag.
- Coverage is limited to breast, prostate and gastric, so a general histopathology department still reads the majority of its case mix without any AI support.
- Pricing is per case and unpublished, so cost scales directly with biopsy volume and does not flatten as the department grows.
Pricing, plan by plan
Annalise.ai
On request- Annalise Enterprise$undefined/year
- Priced per study analysed or as an annual volume subscription
- CXR and CTB licensed separately
- Cleared finding set differs by market, which changes what you are buying
Ibex Medical Analytics
On request- Ibex clinical applications$undefined/year
- Priced per case analysed under an annual agreement
- Breast, prostate and gastric licensed as separate suites
- Regulatory indication differs between Europe and the United States
Which should you pick?
Choose Annalise.ai if
- You need annalise enterprise cxr.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want annalise enterprise ctb.
Choose Ibex Medical Analytics if
- You need ibex breast suite.
- You work on Web, Cloud, On-premise.
- You also want ibex prostate.
Questions people ask
- Is Annalise.ai or Ibex Medical Analytics better?
- Neither clearly leads. Annalise.ai starts at On request and Ibex Medical Analytics at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Annalise.ai or Ibex Medical Analytics?
- Annalise.ai starts at On request and Ibex Medical Analytics at On request.
- Does Annalise.ai or Ibex Medical Analytics run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, Cloud, On-premise, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is Annalise.ai best used for?
- Annalise.ai is most often used for an emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnest, a teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human reads, a screening programme in europe where the broader ce marked decision support indication, rather than the narrow united states triage clearance, is what is being deployed, a radiology department building an ai governance programme that wants one vendor covering both chest radiograph and head ct rather than contracting two separate algorithm suppliers. Of those, an emergency department wanting pneumothorax and intracranial haemorrhage pushed to the front of the reading queue overnight when cover is thinnest and a teleradiology provider covering many small hospitals that needs consistent triage before a human reads are not what Ibex Medical Analytics is typically brought in for.
- What can Annalise.ai do that Ibex Medical Analytics cannot?
- Annalise.ai covers Annalise Enterprise CXR, Annalise Enterprise CTB, Triage and notification, Worklist reprioritisation. Ibex Medical Analytics covers Ibex Breast Suite, Ibex Prostate, Ibex Gastric, Second read safety net.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Annalise.ai: How many findings are FDA cleared?
Around ten across chest X-ray and head CT, for triage and notification only. The model reports far more findings than that; the rest are not cleared in the United States.
Ibex Medical Analytics: Is Ibex FDA cleared?
The regulatory position differs by product and market. In Europe the products carry CE marking under IVDR for defined diagnostic indications; in the United States some applications are used under laboratory developed test arrangements. Confirm the exact status for the specific application and market before assuming it can influence a signed report.
Annalise.ai: Is the European position different?
Yes. CE marking under the medical device regulation covers a broader decision support indication than the United States triage and notification clearances, so the same software is a different regulatory product depending on where you deploy it.
Ibex Medical Analytics: Second read or prescreening?
Both are supported. Second read as a safety net is the more common clinical governance justification; prescreening is the efficiency case.
Annalise.ai: Does it diagnose?
No. In the United States it is a triage and notification device: it flags studies for earlier review, and the radiologist makes the diagnosis.
Ibex Medical Analytics: Does it need a particular scanner?
It ingests from the major whole slide scanner vendors rather than requiring a single fleet, which is a practical advantage over vendors tied to one scanner.
Annalise.ai: Is Annalise.ai becoming Harrison.ai?
The critical care offering is now marketed under the Harrison.ai name. Ask the vendor to name the contracted product explicitly before signing a multi-year deal.
Ibex Medical Analytics: What tissue types are covered?
Breast, prostate and gastric. Everything else in the case mix is unsupported.
Related pages
More on Annalise.ai
More on Ibex Medical Analytics
Other head to heads
- Annalise.ai vs Gleamer
- Annalise.ai vs Rad AI
- Annalise.ai vs Sectra
- Annalise.ai vs Aidoc
- Annalise.ai vs Paige
- Annalise.ai vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Annalise.ai vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Annalise.ai vs Visage Imaging
- Annalise.ai vs Lunit
- Annalise.ai vs Techcyte
- Annalise.ai vs PathAI
- Annalise.ai vs Epocrates
- Annalise.ai vs Figure 1
- Annalise.ai vs Fullscript
- Annalise.ai vs GNU Health
- Annalise.ai vs GoodRx
- Annalise.ai vs Halaxy
- Annalise.ai vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Annalise.ai vs Ambra Health
- Annalise.ai vs Liberty Software
- Annalise.ai vs OpenMRS
- Annalise.ai vs Kareo Clinical
- Annalise.ai vs Practice Fusion
- Annalise.ai vs Ro
- Annalise.ai vs RXNT
- Annalise.ai vs Signant Health
- Annalise.ai vs Sysmex
- Annalise.ai vs Talkspace
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Gleamer
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Rad AI
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Sectra
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Aidoc
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Paige
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Philips IntelliSpace PACS
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Fujifilm Synapse
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Visage Imaging
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Lunit
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Techcyte
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs PathAI
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Epocrates
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Figure 1
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Fullscript
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs GNU Health
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs GoodRx
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Halaxy
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Beckman Coulter DxONE
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Ambra Health
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Liberty Software
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs OpenMRS
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Kareo Clinical
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Practice Fusion
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Ro
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs RXNT
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Signant Health
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Sysmex
- Ibex Medical Analytics vs Talkspace
