Ibex Medical Analyticsvs
Paige


Paige: If holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm matters to your governance committee

Cancer detection AI for breast, prostate and gastric pathology deployed in routine clinical service, not just pilots
As of 1 September 2026, Ibex Medical Analytics's pricing is not published; the vendor quotes on request. Ibex runs AI over digitised biopsies as a first pass quality check before the pathologist signs out, and its differentiator is the number of laboratories running it in routine live service rather than in evaluation. Softwr lists it under Healthcare. Ibex Medical Analytics is made by Ibex Medical Analytics Ltd, available on Web, Self-hosted.
Overview
Ibex Medical Analytics is an Israeli company selling AI diagnostic support for anatomic pathology. Its clinical products are the Ibex Breast Suite, Ibex Prostate and Ibex Gastric, each analysing whole slide images to detect cancer and characterise features such as invasive carcinoma type, nuclear grading, Gleason grading and Helicobacter pylori. It runs either as a second read safety net after the pathologist or as a prescreening triage that highlights suspicious slides first, and it has extended the platform into biopharma biomarker work. The distinguishing point is deployment posture. Ibex has concentrated on getting algorithms into live routine clinical use in laboratories in Israel, the United Kingdom, the Nordics and the United States rather than accumulating pilots, and it publishes real world quality data from those deployments including cases where the AI flagged cancer that the reporting pathologist had missed. That evidence type, a running clinical safety net catching discrepancies in service, is a different and more persuasive argument than a retrospective reader study. It is also the reason the product is often justified as clinical governance spend rather than efficiency spend. Buyers are hospital histopathology departments and private laboratory groups, especially those under pressure from pathologist shortages. The trade offs are the same prerequisites as any pathology AI, a digitised laboratory, plus a sharper regulatory divide than buyers expect: the products carry CE marking under IVDR in Europe for defined diagnostic indications, while the United States position is narrower and some applications are used under laboratory developed test arrangements rather than FDA authorisation. That difference determines whether the algorithm can influence a signed out report or only serve as an internal quality check.
The honest half
Concrete and checkable, so you can decide whether any of them matter to you. This is the half of a review a vendor will not write about Ibex Medical Analytics.
Cross-shopped
Each pairing was judged by two reviewers asking whether a buyer would genuinely weigh the two against each other. The ones that failed were deleted rather than published.


Paige: If holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm matters to your governance committee


Sectra: If the digital pathology workflow and archive is the gap rather than the algorithm


LabWare: If the underlying problem is laboratory information management rather than slide interpretation
Pricing
Taken from the vendor's own pricing page. Prices move, so check before you buy.
Ibex clinical applications
On request
Capabilities
Ibex Breast Suite
Detection and characterisation of invasive and in situ breast carcinoma with nuclear grading
Ibex Prostate
Cancer detection, Gleason grading and perineural invasion on prostate biopsies
Ibex Gastric
Detection of gastric cancer and Helicobacter pylori
Second read safety net
Runs after the pathologist and flags discrepancies before sign out
Prescreening triage
Reorders the slide queue so suspicious cases reach a pathologist first
Heatmap localisation
Highlights the tissue region driving each detection
Quality reporting
Tracks discrepancy rates between AI and reported diagnosis over time
Scanner-agnostic ingestion
Works across major whole slide scanner vendors rather than a single fleet
Answered, with sources
Each answer names the page it came from, so you can check it rather than take our word for it.
The regulatory position differs by product and market. In Europe the products carry CE marking under IVDR for defined diagnostic indications; in the United States some applications are used under laboratory developed test arrangements. Confirm the exact status for the specific application and market before assuming it can influence a signed report.
Both are supported. Second read as a safety net is the more common clinical governance justification; prescreening is the efficiency case.
It ingests from the major whole slide scanner vendors rather than requiring a single fleet, which is a practical advantage over vendors tied to one scanner.
Breast, prostate and gastric. Everything else in the case mix is unsupported.
Keep looking
Digital pathology AI holding the first FDA De Novo authorisation for a pathology algorithm, now part of Tempus
Enterprise imaging and PACS from a Swedish vendor that also sells the pathology and cardiology modules on one platform
AI digital pathology across clinical, veterinary and environmental laboratory disciplines
Multi-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
CE marked and FDA cleared imaging AI suite for bone trauma and chest, now owned by RadNet
Digital pathology image management with an FDA cleared platform for primary diagnosis
FDA cleared and CE marked AI for mammography, tomosynthesis and chest radiography
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
Cloud medical image exchange and vendor neutral archive, now part of Intelerad
Pharmacy management software with a long record in independent retail
Open source electronic medical record platform for low-resource settings, with no vendor and paid implementers instead
Specialized EHR and practice management for independent and small practices
eCOA-first clinical trial platform that has grown outward into EDC, eConsent and televisits
Haematology and urinalysis analysers sold with the middleware that decides which results a scientist ever sees
Consumer online therapy and psychiatry app billed by subscription or insurance copay
Softwr does not host reviews and shows no star rating for Ibex Medical Analytics, because a rating we did not collect is not ours to publish. What is here is the pricing and platform detail from the vendor’s own pages, limitations we could state concretely, and alternatives a reviewer confirmed people weigh against it. Tell us if any of it is wrong.
What people switch to, and what they give up
Every tier, and where the cost actually lands
Put it head to head with anything we hold
Its rating, and an embed for your own site
Clinical laboratory middleware and informatics from a diagnostics instrument manufacturer
quoteOpen source hospital information system and EMR for low-resource hospitals, built on OpenMRS
Open source, no licence feePeriod and cycle tracking app owned by German company Biowink, positioned around science based tracking and a published stance against sharing data with law enforcement
Free with a Plus subscriptionPeriod and cycle tracking app that settled with the US FTC in 2021 over sharing health data with third parties despite promising not to
Free with a Premium subscriptionOpen source health information platform run from the University of Oslo and used by national ministries
Open source, no licence feeMulti-finding chest X-ray and head CT triage AI with FDA clearance on named findings, not on the whole model
quote