Legal · head to head
Litify vs Secure Privacy
Litify
Legal
Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
Secure Privacy
Legal
Consent management and website privacy compliance priced per domain by monthly consent volume
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Secure Privacy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Litify pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.; Secure Privacy consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
- They diverge on capability: Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Litify and Secure Privacy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Litify | Secure Privacy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per domain per month by consent volume |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Litify
- Native Salesforce application
- Intake and referral management
- Matter management
- Reporting and dashboards
- Mass tort handling
Only in Secure Privacy
- Cookie scanning
- Automatic cookie blocking
- Legal templates
- Data subject access requests
- IAB TCF 2.3
- Cross-domain consent
- Scan behind login
- Audit logs and SSO
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Litify
- High volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimantsnot Secure Privacy
- Insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent filesnot Secure Privacy
- Corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reportingnot Secure Privacy
- Multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locationsnot Secure Privacy
Secure Privacy
- A mid-sized ecommerce site that wants published pricing it can budget against rather than an enterprise quote cyclenot Litify
- An agency running consent across many client domains that needs branding removed and per-domain billingnot Litify
- A company that needs both a consent banner and maintained privacy and cookie policy templates without retaining a law firmnot Litify
- A business receiving occasional deletion and access requests that wants them tracked in the same tool rather than in a shared inboxnot Litify
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Litify
- Pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
- The system being administered is Salesforce, so realising the configurability requires Salesforce administration skills most firms must hire or contract for.
- Implementation is a configuration project measured in months, so it is not a system a firm can adopt quickly during a busy period.
- That configurability means two Litify firms can run materially different systems, which makes external support and staff mobility harder.
- There is no public documentation; the support site is behind a customer login, so buyers cannot assess the product depth before committing.
Secure Privacy
- Consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
- Billing is per domain, which makes multi-brand organisations and agencies pay linearly with domain count even when the configuration is identical across all of them.
- There is no data discovery or records of processing at enterprise depth, so it documents website consent rather than a privacy programme, and organisations facing a regulator will still need something more.
- Automatic cookie blocking is not available on the free tier, so the free plan cannot deliver the compliance behaviour that is the reason to install a consent tool in the first place.
- Single sign-on and audit logs appear only on the 249 dollar Advanced tier, which puts basic enterprise access control behind a per-domain price that is punishing for anyone with more than a couple of sites.
Pricing, plan by plan
Litify
On request- Litify$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer with no published rates
- Sold as a bundled subscription including the Salesforce platform entitlement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Secure Privacy
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 10 domains
- 500 consents per month
- 1 legal template
- Small$15/month
- Per domain
- Unlimited domains
- 5,000 consents per month
- Business$59/month
- Per domain
- 50,000 consents per month
- Over 40 legal templates
- Advanced$249/month
- Per domain
- 5 million consents per month
- Audit logs
Which should you pick?
Choose Litify if
- You need native salesforce application.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intake and referral management.
Choose Secure Privacy if
- You need cookie scanning.
- You want to start without paying.
- You also want automatic cookie blocking.
Questions people ask
- Is Litify or Secure Privacy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Litify starts at On request and Secure Privacy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Litify or Secure Privacy?
- Secure Privacy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Litify and Free for Secure Privacy.
- Does Litify or Secure Privacy run on more platforms?
- Litify runs on Web, iOS, Android. Secure Privacy runs on Web.
- Can I use Secure Privacy for free?
- Yes. Secure Privacy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Litify starts at On request.
- What is Litify best used for?
- Litify is most often used for high volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimants, insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent files, corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reporting, multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locations. Of those, high volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimants and insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent files are not what Secure Privacy is typically brought in for.
- What can Litify do that Secure Privacy cannot?
- Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards. Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning, Automatic cookie blocking, Legal templates, Data subject access requests.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Litify: Do we sign a separate contract with Salesforce?
Not according to Litify's published services agreement, which defines Litify as a reseller of the Salesforce services and defines the purchase as a combined offering of the platform plus the Litify application. You buy one subscription from Litify. Confirm how the platform appears on your own order form before signing.
Secure Privacy: What is a consent, for billing purposes?
A recorded consent decision from a visitor. Because returning visitors can re-consent, consent counts do not map cleanly to unique visitors, and this is the most common source of unexpected tier upgrades.
Litify: Is Litify for personal injury or corporate work?
Both, but differently. Plaintiff firms use it for high volume personal injury and mass tort, insurance defence firms for case volume, and corporate legal departments for matter intake and spend management rather than billing.
Secure Privacy: Is the free plan usable?
For evaluation only. It caps at 500 consents a month and does not include automatic cookie blocking.
Litify: Is it suitable for a small firm?
No. It is sold to mid-market and enterprise operations and no entry tier is marketed. The implementation and administration requirements do not amortise at small headcounts.
Secure Privacy: Does it handle data subject requests?
Yes, from the Business tier at 59 US dollars per domain per month. The Small tier does not include it.
Secure Privacy: Can it replace OneTrust?
For website consent and simple request handling, yes. For data discovery, records of processing and vendor risk, no.
Related pages
More on Secure Privacy
Other head to heads
- Litify vs Filevine
- Litify vs Clio
- Litify vs MyCase
- Litify vs CASEpeer
- Litify vs Docketwise
- Litify vs LexisNexis
- Litify vs Harvey
- Litify vs DISCO
- Litify vs Litera
- Litify vs Ironclad
- Litify vs Relativity
- Litify vs Logikcull
- Litify vs Westlaw
- Litify vs Cookiebot
- Litify vs iubenda
- Litify vs Didomi
- Litify vs Luminance
- Litify vs Intapp
- Litify vs Smokeball
- Litify vs Spellbook
- Litify vs iManage
- Litify vs Rocket Matter
- Litify vs Tabs3
- Secure Privacy vs Filevine
- Secure Privacy vs Clio
- Secure Privacy vs MyCase
- Secure Privacy vs CASEpeer
- Secure Privacy vs Docketwise
- Secure Privacy vs LexisNexis
- Secure Privacy vs Harvey
- Secure Privacy vs DISCO
- Secure Privacy vs Litera
- Secure Privacy vs Ironclad
- Secure Privacy vs Relativity
- Secure Privacy vs Logikcull
- Secure Privacy vs Westlaw
- Secure Privacy vs Cookiebot
- Secure Privacy vs iubenda
- Secure Privacy vs Didomi
- Secure Privacy vs Luminance
- Secure Privacy vs Intapp
- Secure Privacy vs Smokeball
- Secure Privacy vs Spellbook
- Secure Privacy vs iManage
- Secure Privacy vs Rocket Matter
- Secure Privacy vs Tabs3