Legal · head to head
Litify vs Tabs3

Litify
Legal
Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Tabs3
Legal
Billing, trust and general ledger accounting for small and mid-sized US law firms
- From
- $69/month
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Litify pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.; Tabs3 the interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- They diverge on capability: Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Litify and Tabs3 actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Litify
- Native Salesforce application
- Intake and referral management
- Matter management
- Reporting and dashboards
- Mass tort handling
Only in Tabs3
- Tabs3 Billing
- Trust accounting
- General ledger and accounts payable
- PracticeMaster
- On-premises or cloud subscription
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Litify
- High volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimantsnot Tabs3
- Insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent filesnot Tabs3
- Corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reportingnot Tabs3
- Multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locationsnot Tabs3
Tabs3
- Small firms billing hourly that want billing and the firm general ledger in one system rather than reconciling twonot Litify
- Practices that must run three-way trust reconciliation without a separate bookkeeping packagenot Litify
- Firms that need an on-premises deployment because of client or insurer restrictions on cloud-hosted matter datanot Litify
- Long-established practices replacing a decades-old billing system while keeping accounting in housenot Litify
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Litify
- Pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
- The system being administered is Salesforce, so realising the configurability requires Salesforce administration skills most firms must hire or contract for.
- Implementation is a configuration project measured in months, so it is not a system a firm can adopt quickly during a busy period.
- That configurability means two Litify firms can run materially different systems, which makes external support and staff mobility harder.
- There is no public documentation; the support site is behind a customer login, so buyers cannot assess the product depth before committing.
Tabs3
- The interface follows Windows desktop conventions from an earlier era, so new fee earners and staff take longer to train than they would on a browser-based competitor.
- On-premises deployment puts backup, disaster recovery, server upgrades and patching on the firm, which small practices without IT support routinely underestimate.
- It is built around hourly and flat fee billing, so a contingency practice tracking case costs and settlement disbursements will find the case financial model a poor fit.
- PracticeMaster case management is priced separately from billing, so the advertised per-user rate is not what a firm wanting matter management actually pays.
- Choosing the on-premises option no longer avoids a subscription, because it is billed per user per month like the hosted version.
Pricing, plan by plan
Litify
On request- Litify$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer with no published rates
- Sold as a bundled subscription including the Salesforce platform entitlement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Tabs3
$69/month- OnSite Subscription$69/month
- Deployed on the firm server
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 32 USD per user per month
- Tabs3 Cloud$89/month
- Hosted by the vendor
- Billing, trust accounting and general ledger
- PracticeMaster add-on at 35 USD per user per month
Which should you pick?
Choose Litify if
- You need native salesforce application.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intake and referral management.
Choose Tabs3 if
- You need tabs3 billing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want trust accounting.
Questions people ask
- Is Litify or Tabs3 better?
- Neither clearly leads. Litify starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Litify or Tabs3?
- Litify starts at On request and Tabs3 at $69/month.
- Does Litify or Tabs3 run on more platforms?
- Litify runs on Web, iOS, Android. Tabs3 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- What is Litify best used for?
- Litify is most often used for high volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimants, insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent files, corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reporting, multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locations. Of those, high volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimants and insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent files are not what Tabs3 is typically brought in for.
- What can Litify do that Tabs3 cannot?
- Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards. Tabs3 covers Tabs3 Billing, Trust accounting, General ledger and accounts payable, PracticeMaster.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Litify: Do we sign a separate contract with Salesforce?
Not according to Litify's published services agreement, which defines Litify as a reseller of the Salesforce services and defines the purchase as a combined offering of the platform plus the Litify application. You buy one subscription from Litify. Confirm how the platform appears on your own order form before signing.
Tabs3: Is Tabs3 right for a personal injury firm working on contingency?
No. It is built for hourly and flat fee billing with a firm general ledger. A contingency practice needs case cost tracking and settlement disbursement handling, which is what CASEpeer and Filevine are built around.
Litify: Is Litify for personal injury or corporate work?
Both, but differently. Plaintiff firms use it for high volume personal injury and mass tort, insurance defence firms for case volume, and corporate legal departments for matter intake and spend management rather than billing.
Tabs3: Can I still buy Tabs3 as a perpetual licence?
No published perpetual price exists. The on-premises option, called OnSite Subscription, starts at 69 USD per user per month, with the hosted Tabs3 Cloud starting at 89 USD per user per month.
Litify: Is it suitable for a small firm?
No. It is sold to mid-market and enterprise operations and no entry tier is marketed. The implementation and administration requirements do not amortise at small headcounts.
Tabs3: Does it replace QuickBooks?
For most firms yes. It includes a double-entry general ledger and accounts payable, which is the usual reason firms choose it over billing-only products.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Litify vs Filevine
- Litify vs Clio
- Litify vs MyCase
- Litify vs CASEpeer
- Litify vs Docketwise
- Litify vs LexisNexis
- Litify vs Harvey
- Litify vs DISCO
- Litify vs Litera
- Litify vs Secure Privacy
- Litify vs Ironclad
- Litify vs Relativity
- Litify vs Logikcull
- Litify vs Westlaw
- Litify vs Cookiebot
- Litify vs Smokeball
- Litify vs CosmoLex
- Litify vs Rocket Matter
- Litify vs Aderant
- Litify vs Actionstep
- Litify vs iManage
- Litify vs Lawmatics
- Tabs3 vs Filevine
- Tabs3 vs Clio
- Tabs3 vs MyCase
- Tabs3 vs CASEpeer
- Tabs3 vs Docketwise
- Tabs3 vs LexisNexis
- Tabs3 vs Harvey
- Tabs3 vs DISCO
- Tabs3 vs Litera
- Tabs3 vs Secure Privacy
- Tabs3 vs Ironclad
- Tabs3 vs Relativity
- Tabs3 vs Logikcull
- Tabs3 vs Westlaw
- Tabs3 vs Cookiebot
- Tabs3 vs Smokeball
- Tabs3 vs CosmoLex
- Tabs3 vs Rocket Matter
- Tabs3 vs Aderant
- Tabs3 vs Actionstep
- Tabs3 vs iManage
- Tabs3 vs Lawmatics
