Softwr

Legal · head to head

Clio vs Secure Privacy

Clio logo

Clio

Legal

Cloud practice management software for law firms

From
On request
Rated
-
Secure Privacy logo

Secure Privacy

Legal

Consent management and website privacy compliance priced per domain by monthly consent volume

From
Free
Rated
-

The short version

  • Only Secure Privacy has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
  • Each has a real cost: Clio priced per user per month, so cost scales directly with headcount and adds up for growing firms; Secure Privacy consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
  • They diverge on capability: Clio covers Matter management, Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning.
  • Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which Clio and Secure Privacy actually diverge.

Attributes where Clio and Secure Privacy differ
AttributeClioSecure Privacy
Starting priceOn requestFree
Pricing modelPer-user subscription with published tiers; contact vendor for current ratesPer domain per month by consent volume
Free tierNoYes
PlatformsWeb, iOS, Android, CloudWeb

Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in Clio

  • Matter management
  • Time and billing
  • Trust accounting
  • Client intake
  • Document management
  • Integration directory

Only in Secure Privacy

  • Cookie scanning
  • Automatic cookie blocking
  • Legal templates
  • Data subject access requests
  • IAB TCF 2.3
  • Cross-domain consent
  • Scan behind login
  • Audit logs and SSO

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

Clio

  • Small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter filesnot Secure Privacy
  • Firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate systemnot Secure Privacy
  • Practices billing hourly that lose revenue to uncaptured timenot Secure Privacy

Secure Privacy

  • A mid-sized ecommerce site that wants published pricing it can budget against rather than an enterprise quote cyclenot Clio
  • An agency running consent across many client domains that needs branding removed and per-domain billingnot Clio
  • A company that needs both a consent banner and maintained privacy and cookie policy templates without retaining a law firmnot Clio
  • A business receiving occasional deletion and access requests that wants them tracked in the same tool rather than in a shared inboxnot Clio

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

Clio

  • Priced per user per month, so cost scales directly with headcount and adds up for growing firms
  • Advanced features including some automation and reporting sit in higher tiers rather than the entry plan
  • Aimed at small and mid-sized firms; large firms with complex matter structures often need heavier systems
  • Strongest in North America, with less depth in other jurisdictions’ compliance requirements

Secure Privacy

  • Consent allowances are the real constraint and they are per domain, so a high traffic site on the Business tier can burn through 50,000 consents well before month end and be pushed to a tier that costs more than four times as much.
  • Billing is per domain, which makes multi-brand organisations and agencies pay linearly with domain count even when the configuration is identical across all of them.
  • There is no data discovery or records of processing at enterprise depth, so it documents website consent rather than a privacy programme, and organisations facing a regulator will still need something more.
  • Automatic cookie blocking is not available on the free tier, so the free plan cannot deliver the compliance behaviour that is the reason to install a consent tool in the first place.
  • Single sign-on and audit logs appear only on the 249 dollar Advanced tier, which puts basic enterprise access control behind a per-domain price that is punishing for anyone with more than a couple of sites.

Pricing, plan by plan

Clio

On request

No published plan breakdown. See the Clio review.

Secure Privacy

Free
  • FreeFree
    • Up to 10 domains
    • 500 consents per month
    • 1 legal template
  • Small$15/month
    • Per domain
    • Unlimited domains
    • 5,000 consents per month
  • Business$59/month
    • Per domain
    • 50,000 consents per month
    • Over 40 legal templates
  • Advanced$249/month
    • Per domain
    • 5 million consents per month
    • Audit logs

Which should you pick?

Choose Clio if

  • You need matter management.
  • You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud.
  • You also want time and billing.

Choose Secure Privacy if

  • You need cookie scanning.
  • You want to start without paying.
  • You also want automatic cookie blocking.

Questions people ask

Is Clio or Secure Privacy better?
Neither clearly leads. Clio starts at On request and Secure Privacy at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, Clio or Secure Privacy?
Secure Privacy has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Clio and Free for Secure Privacy.
Does Clio or Secure Privacy run on more platforms?
Clio runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud. Secure Privacy runs on Web.
Can I use Secure Privacy for free?
Yes. Secure Privacy has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Clio starts at On request.
What is Clio best used for?
Clio is most often used for small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter files, firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate system, practices billing hourly that lose revenue to uncaptured time. Of those, small and mid-sized firms replacing spreadsheets and paper matter files and firms needing compliant trust accounting without a separate system are not what Secure Privacy is typically brought in for.
What can Clio do that Secure Privacy cannot?
Clio covers Matter management, Time and billing, Trust accounting, Client intake. Secure Privacy covers Cookie scanning, Automatic cookie blocking, Legal templates, Data subject access requests.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Clio: What does Clio cost?

Clio sells per-user subscriptions across several tiers. Rates change and vary by region, so check the vendor’s current pricing page rather than relying on a third-party figure.

Secure Privacy: What is a consent, for billing purposes?

A recorded consent decision from a visitor. Because returning visitors can re-consent, consent counts do not map cleanly to unique visitors, and this is the most common source of unexpected tier upgrades.

Clio: Does Clio handle trust accounting?

Yes, and it is one of the main reasons firms adopt it, because client fund rules are strict and mishandling them is a regulatory matter.

Secure Privacy: Is the free plan usable?

For evaluation only. It caps at 500 consents a month and does not include automatic cookie blocking.

Clio: Is Clio suitable for a large firm?

It is aimed at small and mid-sized practices. Large firms with complex matter and billing structures usually evaluate heavier enterprise systems.

Secure Privacy: Does it handle data subject requests?

Yes, from the Business tier at 59 US dollars per domain per month. The Small tier does not include it.

Clio: Does Clio integrate with existing tools?

Yes. Its integration directory is the largest in legal practice software, covering Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, QuickBooks and many others.

Secure Privacy: Can it replace OneTrust?

For website consent and simple request handling, yes. For data discovery, records of processing and vendor risk, no.

Share

Related pages

Other head to heads