Is DISCO or Litify better?

Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and Litify at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.

Which is cheaper, DISCO or Litify?

DISCO starts at On request and Litify at On request.

Does DISCO or Litify run on more platforms?

DISCO runs on Web. Litify runs on Web, iOS, Android.

What is DISCO best used for?

DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what Litify is typically brought in for.

What can DISCO do that Litify cannot?

DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards.

Legal · head to head

DISCO vs Litify

DISCO

Legal

Cloud e-discovery priced by data volume, with review, legal hold and case preparation in one platform

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

Litify

Legal

Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce

From: On request
Rated: -

Full review Website

The short version

Each has a real cost: DISCO per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.; Litify pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
They diverge on capability: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Litify covers Native Salesforce application.
Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.

Where they differ

Only the attributes on which DISCO and Litify actually diverge.

Attributes where DISCO and Litify differ
Attribute	DISCO	Litify
Platforms	Web	Web, iOS, Android

Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).

What each one covers

Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.

Only in DISCO

All-in per-gigabyte pricing
Cecilia AI
Technology assisted review
Legal hold
Case Builder
Self-service ingestion

Only in Litify

Native Salesforce application
Intake and referral management
Matter management
Reporting and dashboards
Mass tort handling

What people use each for

The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.

DISCO

A litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully knownnot Litify
A firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surgenot Litify
An in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of twonot Litify
A case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platformnot Litify

Litify

High volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimantsnot DISCO
Insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent filesnot DISCO
Corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reportingnot DISCO
Multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locationsnot DISCO

Where each one falls short

Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.

DISCO

Per-gigabyte pricing that is attractive on a 200 gigabyte matter becomes the dominant line item on multi-terabyte collections, and the only cost lever left is aggressive culling before upload.
Hosting is cloud only in United States regions, so matters with European, United Kingdom or Australian data residency requirements are excluded outright.
Review analytics, scripting and the third-party application ecosystem remain deeper on Relativity, which matters for firms with established review workflows.
As a listed company reporting losses, it has been through leadership change including the founder departure in 2023, so multi-year roadmap commitments carry more risk than with a private vendor.
Complex productions and unusual data types still require professional services, so the promise of self-service holds mainly for mainstream email and document collections.

Litify

Pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
The system being administered is Salesforce, so realising the configurability requires Salesforce administration skills most firms must hire or contract for.
Implementation is a configuration project measured in months, so it is not a system a firm can adopt quickly during a busy period.
That configurability means two Litify firms can run materially different systems, which makes external support and staff mobility harder.
There is no public documentation; the support site is behind a customer login, so buyers cannot assess the product depth before committing.

Pricing, plan by plan

DISCO

On request

DISCO Ediscovery$undefined/year
- Quoted per gigabyte of hosted data per month with unlimited users
- Annual commitments and volume tiers negotiated for firms with steady caseloads
- Legal hold, Case Builder and AI features priced as separate modules

Litify

On request

Litify$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer with no published rates
- Sold as a bundled subscription including the Salesforce platform entitlement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately

Which should you pick?

Choose DISCO if

You need all-in per-gigabyte pricing.
You also want cecilia ai.

DISCO review

Choose Litify if

You need native salesforce application.
You work on Web, iOS, Android.
You also want intake and referral management.

Litify review

Questions people ask

Is DISCO or Litify better?: Neither clearly leads. DISCO starts at On request and Litify at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
Which is cheaper, DISCO or Litify?: DISCO starts at On request and Litify at On request.
Does DISCO or Litify run on more platforms?: DISCO runs on Web. Litify runs on Web, iOS, Android.
What is DISCO best used for?: DISCO is most often used for a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known, a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge, an in-house legal department consolidating legal hold and review with one vendor instead of two, a case where speed of ingestion matters more than the analytics depth of an enterprise review platform. Of those, a litigation team that needs a matter budget approved before the volume of collected data is fully known and a firm that wants unlimited reviewer accounts without paying per seat during a document review surge are not what Litify is typically brought in for.
What can DISCO do that Litify cannot?: DISCO covers All-in per-gigabyte pricing, Cecilia AI, Technology assisted review, Legal hold. Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards.

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

DISCO: How is DISCO priced?

Per gigabyte of hosted data per month, all-in, with unlimited users. There is no published rate card, so it is quoted.

Litify: Do we sign a separate contract with Salesforce?

Not according to Litify's published services agreement, which defines Litify as a reseller of the Salesforce services and defines the purchase as a combined offering of the platform plus the Litify application. You buy one subscription from Litify. Confirm how the platform appears on your own order form before signing.

DISCO: Can data be hosted outside the United States?

Coverage is centred on United States cloud regions, so confirm residency before shortlisting for European or Australian matters.

Litify: Is Litify for personal injury or corporate work?

Both, but differently. Plaintiff firms use it for high volume personal injury and mass tort, insurance defence firms for case volume, and corporate legal departments for matter intake and spend management rather than billing.

DISCO: Is it cheaper than Relativity?

On small and mid-sized matters usually yes, because seats and analytics are included. On very large collections the volume charge often overtakes a negotiated Relativity arrangement.

Litify: Is it suitable for a small firm?

No. It is sold to mid-market and enterprise operations and no entry tier is marketed. The implementation and administration requirements do not amortise at small headcounts.

DISCO vs Litify

DISCO

Litify

The short version

Where they differ

What each one covers

Only in DISCO

Only in Litify

What people use each for

DISCO

Litify

Where each one falls short

DISCO

Litify

Pricing, plan by plan

DISCO

Litify

Which should you pick?

Choose DISCO if

Choose Litify if

Questions people ask

Answered from the vendors’ own pages

Related pages

More on DISCO

More on Litify

Keep looking

Other head to heads