Legal · head to head
CASEpeer vs Litify
CASEpeer
Legal
Case management built specifically for plaintiff personal injury firms
- From
- $79/month
- Rated
- -
Litify
Legal
Legal case and matter management built natively on Salesforce
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: CASEpeer it is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.; Litify pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
- They diverge on capability: CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Litify covers Native Salesforce application.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which CASEpeer and Litify actually diverge.
Identical on both: free tier (No), platforms (Web, iOS, Android), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Legal).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in CASEpeer
- Intake and case screening
- Medical treatment tracking
- Settlement and lien management
- Negotiation tracking
- Statute of limitations monitoring
Only in Litify
- Native Salesforce application
- Intake and referral management
- Matter management
- Reporting and dashboards
- Mass tort handling
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
CASEpeer
- Plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien trackingnot Litify
- Contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one placenot Litify
- Personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measurednot Litify
- Firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseloadnot Litify
Litify
- High volume plaintiff firms running mass tort matters with thousands of claimantsnot CASEpeer
- Insurance defence operations needing matter management across many concurrent filesnot CASEpeer
- Corporate legal departments needing matter intake and outside counsel spend reportingnot CASEpeer
- Multi-office practices needing referral tracking and consistent intake across locationsnot CASEpeer
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
CASEpeer
- It is built for plaintiff contingency work, so a firm doing hourly defence or corporate work will find no billing model that matches how it earns.
- There is no full double-entry general ledger, so the firm still needs separate accounting software and somebody to reconcile between the two.
- The narrow personal injury focus means a practice that diversifies into family, employment or criminal work has to run a second system or migrate.
- It has changed corporate hands three times since 2021, from independent to MyCase to AffiniPay, now trading as 8am, so roadmap continuity is a fair question to put to the vendor.
- Sitting in the 8am group aligns it with LawPay and MyCase, so firms committed to a different payments provider get less from the integrations.
Litify
- Pricing is not published anywhere and there is no entry tier, so a firm cannot judge affordability without entering a sales process.
- The system being administered is Salesforce, so realising the configurability requires Salesforce administration skills most firms must hire or contract for.
- Implementation is a configuration project measured in months, so it is not a system a firm can adopt quickly during a busy period.
- That configurability means two Litify firms can run materially different systems, which makes external support and staff mobility harder.
- There is no public documentation; the support site is behind a customer login, so buyers cannot assess the product depth before committing.
Pricing, plan by plan
CASEpeer
$79/month- Basic$79/month
- Personal injury case management
- Intake and treatment tracking
- No minimum seat count
- Pro$119/month
- Adds reporting and automation
- Lien and settlement tracking
- No long-term contract required
- Advanced$149/month
- Full feature set
- Advanced reporting
- No long-term contract required
Litify
On request- Litify$undefined/year
- Quoted per customer with no published rates
- Sold as a bundled subscription including the Salesforce platform entitlement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
Which should you pick?
Choose CASEpeer if
- You need intake and case screening.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want medical treatment tracking.
Choose Litify if
- You need native salesforce application.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want intake and referral management.
Questions people ask
- Is CASEpeer or Litify better?
- Neither clearly leads. CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Litify at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, CASEpeer or Litify?
- CASEpeer starts at $79/month and Litify at On request.
- Does CASEpeer or Litify run on more platforms?
- Both run on Web, iOS, Android, so platform support will not decide this one for you.
- What is CASEpeer best used for?
- CASEpeer is most often used for plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking, contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place, personal injury firms with high lead volume that need intake conversion measured, firms exposed to missed limitation dates across a large open caseload. Of those, plaintiff personal injury firms replacing spreadsheets for medical records and lien tracking and contingency practices needing case value, costs advanced and net client distribution in one place are not what Litify is typically brought in for.
- What can CASEpeer do that Litify cannot?
- CASEpeer covers Intake and case screening, Medical treatment tracking, Settlement and lien management, Negotiation tracking. Litify covers Native Salesforce application, Intake and referral management, Matter management, Reporting and dashboards.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
CASEpeer: Is CASEpeer suitable for a corporate or defence firm?
No. It is built around contingency personal injury work: treatment, liens and settlement. A corporate firm billing hourly should look at Clio, Tabs3 or a large firm system instead.
Litify: Do we sign a separate contract with Salesforce?
Not according to Litify's published services agreement, which defines Litify as a reseller of the Salesforce services and defines the purchase as a combined offering of the platform plus the Litify application. You buy one subscription from Litify. Confirm how the platform appears on your own order form before signing.
CASEpeer: What does CASEpeer cost?
Published per-user rates are 79 USD for Basic, 119 USD for Pro and 149 USD for Advanced per month, with no minimum seat count and no long-term contract required.
Litify: Is Litify for personal injury or corporate work?
Both, but differently. Plaintiff firms use it for high volume personal injury and mass tort, insurance defence firms for case volume, and corporate legal departments for matter intake and spend management rather than billing.
CASEpeer: Who owns CASEpeer?
It was acquired by MyCase in March 2021 and moved to AffiniPay in June 2022. AffiniPay rebranded to 8am in August 2025, so CASEpeer now sits alongside MyCase and LawPay in that group.
Litify: Is it suitable for a small firm?
No. It is sold to mid-market and enterprise operations and no entry tier is marketed. The implementation and administration requirements do not amortise at small headcounts.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- CASEpeer vs Filevine
- CASEpeer vs Clio
- CASEpeer vs MyCase
- CASEpeer vs LexisNexis
- CASEpeer vs Docketwise
- CASEpeer vs Relativity
- CASEpeer vs Everlaw
- CASEpeer vs Smokeball
- CASEpeer vs Logikcull
- CASEpeer vs DISCO
- CASEpeer vs iManage
- CASEpeer vs Intapp
- CASEpeer vs Litera
- CASEpeer vs Rocket Matter
- CASEpeer vs Secure Privacy
- CASEpeer vs Tabs3
- CASEpeer vs Harvey
- CASEpeer vs Ironclad
- CASEpeer vs Westlaw
- CASEpeer vs Cookiebot
- Litify vs Filevine
- Litify vs Clio
- Litify vs MyCase
- Litify vs LexisNexis
- Litify vs Docketwise
- Litify vs Relativity
- Litify vs Everlaw
- Litify vs Smokeball
- Litify vs Logikcull
- Litify vs DISCO
- Litify vs iManage
- Litify vs Intapp
- Litify vs Litera
- Litify vs Rocket Matter
- Litify vs Secure Privacy
- Litify vs Tabs3
- Litify vs Harvey
- Litify vs Ironclad
- Litify vs Westlaw
- Litify vs Cookiebot