Cybersecurity · head to head
Resolver vs TunnelBear

Resolver
Cybersecurity
Risk, incident and investigations platform for corporate security and operational risk teams, owned by Kroll
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
TunnelBear
Cybersecurity
Consumer VPN with a limited free tier and a bear-themed, beginner-friendly app
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only TunnelBear has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Resolver kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.; TunnelBear free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- They diverge on capability: Resolver covers Incident management, TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Resolver and TunnelBear actually diverge.
| Attribute | Resolver | TunnelBear |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | windows, mac, linux, ios, android |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Resolver
- Incident management
- Investigations
- Enterprise risk management
- Internal audit
- Compliance and obligations
- Business continuity
- Risk Event Management
- Configurable dashboards
Only in TunnelBear
- Encrypted VPN tunnel
- Server location switching
- GhostBear obfuscation
- Browser extensions
- Teams account management
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Resolver
- A national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handlingnot TunnelBear
- A bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and emailnot TunnelBear
- A university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single recordnot TunnelBear
- An organisation that already retains Kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platformnot TunnelBear
TunnelBear
- Casual browsing protection on public Wi-Finot Resolver
- Occasional geo-unblocking with a light free allowancenot Resolver
- Bypassing network-level VPN blocking via obfuscationnot Resolver
- Managing VPN access for a small team with centralized billingnot Resolver
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Resolver
- Kroll ownership since 2022 means the product is sold alongside risk consulting services, so buyers who want software with no services attach should expect that conversation and should price the licence separately in negotiation.
- Configuration flexibility comes at the cost of implementation time, with deployments commonly running several months and typically requiring vendor or partner services, so the first-year cost is well above the annual licence.
- Module-based pricing means the platform gets expensive quickly once you add audit, compliance and continuity to a security-led purchase, and modules bought later rarely carry the discount of the original deal.
- The IT and cyber compliance side is thinner than dedicated tools, so organisations chasing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 evidence automation will find it does not replace a Drata or Vanta.
- Reporting is capable but the drag and drop builder has a real learning curve, and organisations that do not train an internal administrator end up raising support tickets for changes that should be self-service.
TunnelBear
- Free plan's data cap is small compared to competitors offering more generous free allowances.
- Lacks advanced features like dedicated IP addresses or split-tunneling controls found in some rival VPNs.
- Server network is smaller than large competitors like NordVPN or ExpressVPN.
- No standalone router-level app, limiting whole-network protection options.
Pricing, plan by plan
Resolver
On request- Resolver Core$undefined/year
- Priced by modules selected and number of users
- Annual or multi-year enterprise agreement
- Implementation and configuration quoted separately
TunnelBear
Free- FreeFree
- 2GB of data per month
- Access to VPN servers
- Unlimited devices
- Unlimited$9.99/month
- Unlimited monthly data
- All server locations
- Cheaper on annual/3-year billing
- Teams$undefined/month
- Unlimited data
- 5 connected devices per user
- Dedicated account manager
Which should you pick?
Choose Resolver if
- You need incident management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want investigations.
Choose TunnelBear if
- You need encrypted vpn tunnel.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- You also want server location switching.
Questions people ask
- Is Resolver or TunnelBear better?
- Neither clearly leads. Resolver starts at On request and TunnelBear at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Resolver or TunnelBear?
- TunnelBear has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Resolver and Free for TunnelBear.
- Does Resolver or TunnelBear run on more platforms?
- Resolver runs on Web, iOS, Android. TunnelBear runs on windows, mac, linux, ios, android.
- Can I use TunnelBear for free?
- Yes. TunnelBear has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Resolver starts at On request.
- What is Resolver best used for?
- Resolver is most often used for a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling, a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email, a university security operations centre running dispatch, case management and clery-style reporting from a single record, an organisation that already retains kroll for investigations and wants case intake and vendor handoff in the same platform. Of those, a national retailer consolidating store incident reporting, loss prevention cases and investigations into one system with defensible evidence handling and a bank that needs operational risk events captured against a risk and control register rather than in spreadsheets and email are not what TunnelBear is typically brought in for.
- What can Resolver do that TunnelBear cannot?
- Resolver covers Incident management, Investigations, Enterprise risk management, Internal audit. TunnelBear covers Encrypted VPN tunnel, Server location switching, GhostBear obfuscation, Browser extensions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Resolver: Who owns Resolver?
Kroll, which acquired it in 2022. It is marketed as a Kroll business and sold alongside Kroll risk and investigations services.
Resolver: What does Resolver cost?
Pricing is not published. It is quoted by module and user count on an annual or multi-year enterprise agreement, with implementation charged separately.
Resolver: Is Resolver a SOC 2 compliance tool?
No. It is a risk, incident and investigations platform. Automated evidence collection for security certifications is not its strength.
Resolver: How long does implementation take?
Months rather than weeks for a multi-module deployment, and most customers use vendor or partner services to configure it.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Resolver vs LogicManager
- Resolver vs Diligent
- Resolver vs MetricStream
- Resolver vs NICE Actimize
- Resolver vs Omada Identity
- Resolver vs Sardine
- Resolver vs Silent Eight
- Resolver vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- Resolver vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- Resolver vs OneTrust
- Resolver vs Rhombus Systems
- Resolver vs Trulioo
- Resolver vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- Resolver vs ExpressVPN
- Resolver vs Falco
- Resolver vs Fenergo
- Resolver vs Google Authenticator
- Resolver vs Grype
- Resolver vs Windscribe
- Resolver vs Mullvad VPN
- Resolver vs Private Internet Access
- Resolver vs IVPN
- Resolver vs Enpass
- Resolver vs CyberGhost VPN
- Resolver vs NordVPN
- Resolver vs Surfshark
- Resolver vs Avast One
- Resolver vs ProtonVPN
- Resolver vs LastPass
- Resolver vs Jamf Pro
- Resolver vs Keeper Password Manager
- Resolver vs Keygen
- Resolver vs KnowBe4
- Resolver vs Legit Security
- Resolver vs LogRhythm SIEM
- TunnelBear vs LogicManager
- TunnelBear vs Diligent
- TunnelBear vs MetricStream
- TunnelBear vs NICE Actimize
- TunnelBear vs Omada Identity
- TunnelBear vs Sardine
- TunnelBear vs Silent Eight
- TunnelBear vs Splunk Enterprise Security
- TunnelBear vs Varonis Data Security Platform
- TunnelBear vs OneTrust
- TunnelBear vs Rhombus Systems
- TunnelBear vs Trulioo
- TunnelBear vs ESET NOD32 Antivirus
- TunnelBear vs ExpressVPN
- TunnelBear vs Falco
- TunnelBear vs Fenergo
- TunnelBear vs Google Authenticator
- TunnelBear vs Grype
- TunnelBear vs Windscribe
- TunnelBear vs Mullvad VPN
- TunnelBear vs Private Internet Access
- TunnelBear vs IVPN
- TunnelBear vs Enpass
- TunnelBear vs CyberGhost VPN
- TunnelBear vs NordVPN
- TunnelBear vs Surfshark
- TunnelBear vs Avast One
- TunnelBear vs ProtonVPN
- TunnelBear vs LastPass
- TunnelBear vs Jamf Pro
- TunnelBear vs Keeper Password Manager
- TunnelBear vs Keygen
- TunnelBear vs KnowBe4
- TunnelBear vs Legit Security
- TunnelBear vs LogRhythm SIEM
