Cybersecurity · head to head
Endor Labs vs Speakeasy

Endor Labs
Cybersecurity
Security and AI agent governance for code and supply chain
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Speakeasy
Cybersecurity
AI control plane for governing enterprise agents, MCP servers, and skills
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Endor Labs has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Endor Labs pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates; Speakeasy no self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- They diverge on capability: Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 29 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Endor Labs and Speakeasy actually diverge.
| Attribute | Endor Labs | Speakeasy |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Seat-based per contributing developer with volume discounts | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, CLI, IDE | web, api |
| Founded | 2021 | Unknown |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Cybersecurity).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Endor Labs
- AI coding agent governance
- SAST scanning
- Secrets detection
- Reachability analysis
- Open source dependency scanning
- Package firewall
- MCP server integration
Only in Speakeasy
- AI tool catalog
- Per-agent identity
- Role-based access control
- Real-time policy enforcement
- Audit logging
- MDM and SSO integration
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Endor Labs
- Securing AI coding agent outputs before deploymentnot Speakeasy
- Reducing SAST false positives with reachability analysisnot Speakeasy
- Managing open source supply chain risknot Speakeasy
- Enforcing security policies in CI/CD pipelinesnot Speakeasy
Speakeasy
- Governing AI agents at enterprise scalenot Endor Labs
- Preventing shadow AI tool sprawlnot Endor Labs
- Enforcing least-privilege access for agentsnot Endor Labs
- Auditing AI tool call activity for compliancenot Endor Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Endor Labs
- Pricing requires contacting sales, no transparent rates
- Developer tier lacks UI and historical scan data
- Free tier limited to local scanning only
- Seat-based model may become expensive for large teams
Speakeasy
- No self-serve pricing is published; every plan requires a sales conversation.
- The product pivoted away from its original SDK-generation offering, so past documentation and customers built on that use case are no longer the focus.
- Requires integration with an existing identity provider such as Okta or Entra ID to be useful, so it is not a standalone solution.
- No published free tier or trial pricing was found.
Pricing, plan by plan
Endor Labs
Free- DeveloperFree
- Local scanning
- Read-only vulnerability data
- No UI, policies, or scan history
Speakeasy
On request- Enterprise$undefined/mo
- Custom pricing
- AI tool catalog and visibility
- Per-agent identity and access control
Which should you pick?
Choose Endor Labs if
- You need ai coding agent governance.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, CLI, IDE.
- You also want sast scanning.
Choose Speakeasy if
- You need ai tool catalog.
- You work on web, api.
- You also want per-agent identity.
Questions people ask
- Is Endor Labs or Speakeasy better?
- Neither clearly leads. Endor Labs starts at Free and Speakeasy at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Endor Labs or Speakeasy?
- Endor Labs has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for Endor Labs and On request for Speakeasy.
- Does Endor Labs or Speakeasy run on more platforms?
- Endor Labs runs on Web, CLI, IDE. Speakeasy runs on web, api.
- Can I use Endor Labs for free?
- Yes. Endor Labs has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Speakeasy starts at On request.
- What is Endor Labs best used for?
- Endor Labs is most often used for securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment, reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis, managing open source supply chain risk, enforcing security policies in ci/cd pipelines. Of those, securing ai coding agent outputs before deployment and reducing sast false positives with reachability analysis are not what Speakeasy is typically brought in for.
- What can Endor Labs do that Speakeasy cannot?
- Endor Labs covers AI coding agent governance, SAST scanning, Secrets detection, Reachability analysis. Speakeasy covers AI tool catalog, Per-agent identity, Role-based access control, Real-time policy enforcement.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Endor Labs: What is the difference between Endor Labs Developer and paid tiers?
Developer tier is free and provides local scanning via MCP server with read-only vulnerability access and no UI. Paid tiers (Core and Pro) add team features like policy enforcement, enterprise integrations, reporting, and scan history.
SourceSpeakeasy: How much does Speakeasy cost?
Speakeasy offers an Enterprise tier with features including SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. No specific pricing is published; interested parties contact the company to discuss pricing.
SourceEndor Labs: How does Endor Labs define seats for pricing?
Seats are calculated per contributing developer (those with commits in monitored repositories within the last 90 days). Volume discounts apply as team size grows.
SourceSpeakeasy: What is included in Speakeasy's Enterprise plan?
The Enterprise plan includes SaaS catalog integrations, custom server creation, code mode efficiency, and serverless hosting. Customers contact Speakeasy to discuss their specific pricing for these features.
SourceEndor Labs: Does Endor Labs support on-premises deployment?
The platform is cloud-based SaaS by default. Enterprise customers should contact sales to discuss custom deployment options.
SourceRelated pages
Other head to heads
- Endor Labs vs Snyk
- Endor Labs vs Socket
- Endor Labs vs Chainguard
- Endor Labs vs Akeyless
- Endor Labs vs Doppler
- Endor Labs vs Arnica
- Endor Labs vs Infisical
- Endor Labs vs Veracode
- Endor Labs vs Tenable
- Endor Labs vs HashiCorp Vault
- Endor Labs vs Transcend
- Endor Labs vs Windscribe
- Endor Labs vs Yoti
- Endor Labs vs authentik
- Endor Labs vs Avast One
- Endor Labs vs Cosign
- Endor Labs vs Frontegg
- Endor Labs vs Netwrix
- Endor Labs vs Securiti
- Endor Labs vs Qualys VMDR
- Endor Labs vs Omada Identity
- Endor Labs vs Saviynt
- Endor Labs vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Endor Labs vs TunnelBear
- Endor Labs vs Vanta
- Endor Labs vs Acunetix
- Endor Labs vs Aikido
- Speakeasy vs Snyk
- Speakeasy vs Socket
- Speakeasy vs Chainguard
- Speakeasy vs Akeyless
- Speakeasy vs Doppler
- Speakeasy vs Arnica
- Speakeasy vs Infisical
- Speakeasy vs Veracode
- Speakeasy vs Tenable
- Speakeasy vs HashiCorp Vault
- Speakeasy vs Transcend
- Speakeasy vs Windscribe
- Speakeasy vs Yoti
- Speakeasy vs authentik
- Speakeasy vs Avast One
- Speakeasy vs Cosign
- Speakeasy vs Frontegg
- Speakeasy vs Netwrix
- Speakeasy vs Securiti
- Speakeasy vs Qualys VMDR
- Speakeasy vs Omada Identity
- Speakeasy vs Saviynt
- Speakeasy vs Trend Micro Vision One
- Speakeasy vs TunnelBear
- Speakeasy vs Vanta
- Speakeasy vs Acunetix
- Speakeasy vs Aikido
