Manufacturing · head to head
Materialise Magics vs PROGNOST Systems

Materialise Magics
Manufacturing
Industrial build preparation and data repair for metal and polymer additive manufacturing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Materialise Magics new seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.; PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- They diverge on capability: Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Materialise Magics and PROGNOST Systems actually diverge.
| Attribute | Materialise Magics | PROGNOST Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows | Windows, On-premise |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Materialise Magics
- Mesh repair
- Part orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build Processors
- Simulation module
- Structures module
- Reporting and traceability
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Materialise Magics
- A service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicersnot PROGNOST Systems
- Repairing badly formed STL or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not acceptnot PROGNOST Systems
- Automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the processnot PROGNOST Systems
- Simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal buildnot PROGNOST Systems
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot Materialise Magics
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot Materialise Magics
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot Materialise Magics
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot Materialise Magics
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Materialise Magics
- New seats and modules have been subscription only since 15 May 2024, so the perpetual purchase route is closed and existing perpetual holders are on a shrinking island.
- Build Processors are licensed separately per machine family, so adding a new printer brand adds a licence line as well as capital cost, and a mixed fleet multiplies the software bill.
- The modules that deliver the biggest labour saving, notably e-Stage automated support generation, are paid extras, so the base seat alone leaves you doing manual support work.
- Materialise publishes no prices anywhere, and quotes vary by region and reseller, so two similar bureaus can pay materially different amounts for the same configuration.
- It is Windows only and remains a desktop application, which sits awkwardly with the cloud direction of Materialise CO-AM and means preparation capacity is tied to specific workstations and licence seats.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Pricing, plan by plan
Materialise Magics
On request- Magics Essentials$undefined/year
- Mesh repair and editing
- Part orientation and platform placement
- Basic support generation
- Magics with modules$undefined/year
- Everything in Essentials
- e-Stage automated supports, Simulation, Structures priced individually
- Build Processors licensed per machine family
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Which should you pick?
Choose Materialise Magics if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows.
- You also want part orientation and nesting.
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Questions people ask
- Is Materialise Magics or PROGNOST Systems better?
- Neither clearly leads. Materialise Magics starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Materialise Magics or PROGNOST Systems?
- Materialise Magics starts at On request and PROGNOST Systems at On request.
- Does Materialise Magics or PROGNOST Systems run on more platforms?
- Materialise Magics runs on Windows. PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise.
- What is Materialise Magics best used for?
- Materialise Magics is most often used for a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers, repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept, automating support generation on metal parts where manual support editing is the bottleneck in the process, simulating and compensating for build distortion before committing an expensive metal build. Of those, a service bureau running several brands of metal printer that wants one preparation environment instead of five vendor slicers and repairing badly formed stl or scan-derived meshes that a machine slicer will not accept are not what PROGNOST Systems is typically brought in for.
- What can Materialise Magics do that PROGNOST Systems cannot?
- Materialise Magics covers Mesh repair, Part orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build Processors. PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Materialise Magics: Can I still buy a perpetual Magics licence?
No. Since 15 May 2024 Materialise sells new seats and new modules on subscription only. Existing perpetual licences continue to work but new capacity is subscription.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
Materialise Magics: Do I need a separate Build Processor for each printer?
You need one per machine family, licensed separately from the Magics seat. Budget for it before you buy the printer.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
Materialise Magics: Is Magics the same as CO-AM?
No. Magics is desktop build preparation. CO-AM is the Materialise cloud platform for AM workflow and production management, which absorbed the former Link3D product.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
Materialise Magics: Does Magics slice?
It prepares and supports the build and hands off through a Build Processor, which produces the machine-ready file. The machine-specific processing lives in the Build Processor.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Related pages
More on Materialise Magics
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- Materialise Magics vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Materialise Magics vs Oqton
- Materialise Magics vs GrabCAD Print
- Materialise Magics vs Formlabs PreForm
- Materialise Magics vs Simplify3D
- Materialise Magics vs Markforged Eiger
- Materialise Magics vs SolidWorks
- Materialise Magics vs AVEVA System Platform
- Materialise Magics vs 3YOURMIND
- Materialise Magics vs Aras Innovator
- Materialise Magics vs Authentise
- Materialise Magics vs Dyndrite
- Materialise Magics vs QAD Redzone
- Materialise Magics vs Seeq
- Materialise Magics vs Sensemore
- Materialise Magics vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Materialise Magics vs TrendMiner
- Materialise Magics vs Ignition
- Materialise Magics vs Augury
- Materialise Magics vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Materialise Magics vs Erbessd Instruments
- Materialise Magics vs KCF Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs Petasense
- Materialise Magics vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Materialise Magics vs eMaint
- Materialise Magics vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Materialise Magics vs Poseidon Systems
- Materialise Magics vs MOVUS
- Materialise Magics vs Xometry
- Materialise Magics vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Autodesk Netfabb
- PROGNOST Systems vs Oqton
- PROGNOST Systems vs GrabCAD Print
- PROGNOST Systems vs Formlabs PreForm
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs Markforged Eiger
- PROGNOST Systems vs SolidWorks
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs 3YOURMIND
- PROGNOST Systems vs Aras Innovator
- PROGNOST Systems vs Authentise
- PROGNOST Systems vs Dyndrite
- PROGNOST Systems vs QAD Redzone
- PROGNOST Systems vs Seeq
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
