Manufacturing · head to head
PROGNOST Systems vs Propel

PROGNOST Systems
Manufacturing
SIL 3 rated online monitoring and diagnostics for reciprocating compressors
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Propel
Manufacturing
PLM, quality and product information management built on the Salesforce platform
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: PROGNOST Systems nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.; Propel your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- They diverge on capability: PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Propel covers Item and BOM management.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which PROGNOST Systems and Propel actually diverge.
| Attribute | PROGNOST Systems | Propel |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, On-premise | Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in PROGNOST Systems
- Segmented vibration analysis
- Dynamic rod position
- Online pV diagram
- Dynamic rod load
- SIL 3 machine protection
- Damage pattern library
- PROGNOST-Predictor
- Remote expert service
Only in Propel
- Item and BOM management
- Change management
- Quality management
- Product information management
- Supplier collaboration
- Native Salesforce
- Licence types
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
PROGNOST Systems
- A refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring systemnot Propel
- Replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one SIL 3 rated installationnot Propel
- Gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machinenot Propel
- A plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will acceptnot Propel
Propel
- A medical device company needing linked design control and CAPA records for an ISO 13485 audit without an on-premise PLM programmenot PROGNOST Systems
- A consumer products firm publishing the same product record to engineering, packaging and e-commerce teamsnot PROGNOST Systems
- A company already standardised on Salesforce that wants product data governed with the same admin skills as the CRMnot PROGNOST Systems
- A hardware manufacturer routing customer complaints straight to the part revision and supplier that caused themnot PROGNOST Systems
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
PROGNOST Systems
- Nothing about price is published, and because the system is instrumented per machine train, there is no per-point comparison that lets a buyer benchmark it against general-purpose condition monitoring.
- Installation requires proximity probes, rod position sensors and pressure instrumentation on the machine, which usually means a planned outage and mechanical work before any data exists.
- The value is concentrated in reciprocating compressors; for general rotating equipment across a whole plant it is a far more expensive route than a broad vibration programme.
- SIL 3 certification brings the configuration into functional safety scope, so changes to thresholds and logic go through management of change rather than being adjusted by a reliability engineer.
- The company is small and German-based, so response times and spares logistics for remote sites depend on a partner network rather than a global direct service organisation.
Propel
- Your product data lives in a Salesforce org, so a future decision to leave Salesforce becomes a PLM migration as well as a CRM one, and the extraction is not trivial.
- CAD data management is handled through connectors rather than natively; Propel manages metadata and files well but is not a substitute for a CAD vault on large assemblies.
- The published cost bands are extremely wide, from 10,000 to 500,000 US dollars a year, and setup can approach the annual licence, so early budgeting without a scoped quote is close to meaningless.
- Licence roles are split across Performance, Quality, Enrichment, Collaboration and Partner types, and buyers frequently discover mid-project that a user needs a more expensive role than budgeted.
- Salesforce platform limits such as governor limits, API call ceilings and storage allowances apply, and organisations with very large BOMs or heavy integration traffic hit them in ways a purpose-built PLM would not surface.
Pricing, plan by plan
PROGNOST Systems
On request- PROGNOST-NT$undefined/year
- Priced per machine train as an instrumented system
- Sensors, proximity probes, rod position and pressure instrumentation included in scope
- Installation typically requires a machine outage for probe fitting
Propel
On request- Propel$undefined/year
- Annual user-based licensing in role types
- Salesforce platform access included in each licence
- Indicative small deployment band of 10,000 to 150,000 USD a year plus 10,000 to 25,000 setup
Which should you pick?
Choose PROGNOST Systems if
- You need segmented vibration analysis.
- You work on Windows, On-premise.
- You also want dynamic rod position.
Choose Propel if
- You need item and bom management.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- You also want change management.
Questions people ask
- Is PROGNOST Systems or Propel better?
- Neither clearly leads. PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and Propel at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, PROGNOST Systems or Propel?
- PROGNOST Systems starts at On request and Propel at On request.
- Does PROGNOST Systems or Propel run on more platforms?
- PROGNOST Systems runs on Windows, On-premise. Propel runs on Web, iOS, Android, Cloud, API.
- What is PROGNOST Systems best used for?
- PROGNOST Systems is most often used for a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system, replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation, gas transmission stations needing valve and rider ring wear diagnosis without opening the machine, a plant moving reciprocating compressors from time-based overhaul to condition-based intervals with evidence a regulator will accept. Of those, a refinery hydrogen recycle compressor where an unplanned trip costs more per day than the monitoring system and replacing a separate protection system and a separate condition monitoring system with one sil 3 rated installation are not what Propel is typically brought in for.
- What can PROGNOST Systems do that Propel cannot?
- PROGNOST Systems covers Segmented vibration analysis, Dynamic rod position, Online pV diagram, Dynamic rod load. Propel covers Item and BOM management, Change management, Quality management, Product information management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
PROGNOST Systems: Does it replace the compressor protection system?
It can. PROGNOST-NT is SIL 3 rated for machine protection, which is the main reason sites choose it over advisory-only monitoring.
Propel: Do I need to buy Salesforce separately?
No. Each Propel licence includes Salesforce platform access, and end users do not need their own Salesforce licences or Salesforce expertise.
PROGNOST Systems: Can it be retrofitted to an existing compressor?
Yes, but fitting rod position and internal instrumentation generally needs a machine outage.
Propel: Does being on Salesforce lock me in?
Practically, yes. The application, its configuration and your product data all sit in a Salesforce org, which is a real consideration at renewal.
PROGNOST Systems: Does it work on centrifugal machines?
PROGNOST offers products for general rotating equipment, but the differentiated diagnostics are for reciprocating compressors.
Propel: What does it cost?
Propel publishes indicative bands rather than list prices: roughly 10,000 to 150,000 US dollars a year for a small deployment and 250,000 to 500,000 for a large one, plus setup.
PROGNOST Systems: Is it available on new Burckhardt machines?
Yes, Burckhardt Compression offers PROGNOST-NT as a factory-fitted condition monitoring option.
Propel: Is it suitable for regulated medical devices?
Yes, that is a core segment; the quality module covers CAPA, non-conformance, audits and training records with electronic signatures.
Related pages
More on PROGNOST Systems
Other head to heads
- PROGNOST Systems vs Ignition
- PROGNOST Systems vs Augury
- PROGNOST Systems vs SKF Enlight Centre
- PROGNOST Systems vs Erbessd Instruments
- PROGNOST Systems vs KCF Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs Petasense
- PROGNOST Systems vs Sensemore
- PROGNOST Systems vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- PROGNOST Systems vs eMaint
- PROGNOST Systems vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- PROGNOST Systems vs Poseidon Systems
- PROGNOST Systems vs MOVUS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- PROGNOST Systems vs Simplify3D
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrendMiner
- PROGNOST Systems vs Xometry
- PROGNOST Systems vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- PROGNOST Systems vs Arena PLM
- PROGNOST Systems vs Aras Innovator
- PROGNOST Systems vs OpenBOM
- PROGNOST Systems vs Materialise Magics
- PROGNOST Systems vs SolidWorks
- PROGNOST Systems vs AVEVA System Platform
- PROGNOST Systems vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- PROGNOST Systems vs Fusion 360
- PROGNOST Systems vs TrakSYS
- PROGNOST Systems vs Litmus Edge
- PROGNOST Systems vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- PROGNOST Systems vs LabVIEW
- PROGNOST Systems vs ABB 800xA
- PROGNOST Systems vs PTC Windchill
- Propel vs Ignition
- Propel vs Augury
- Propel vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Propel vs Erbessd Instruments
- Propel vs KCF Technologies
- Propel vs Petasense
- Propel vs Sensemore
- Propel vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Propel vs eMaint
- Propel vs Nanoprecise Sci Corp
- Propel vs Poseidon Systems
- Propel vs MOVUS
- Propel vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Propel vs Simplify3D
- Propel vs TrendMiner
- Propel vs Xometry
- Propel vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Propel vs Arena PLM
- Propel vs Aras Innovator
- Propel vs OpenBOM
- Propel vs Materialise Magics
- Propel vs SolidWorks
- Propel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Propel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Propel vs Fusion 360
- Propel vs TrakSYS
- Propel vs Litmus Edge
- Propel vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Propel vs LabVIEW
- Propel vs ABB 800xA
- Propel vs PTC Windchill
