Manufacturing · head to head
Maintenance Connection vs OpenBOM

Maintenance Connection
Manufacturing
Enterprise CMMS from Accruent for multi-site asset management
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Maintenance Connection implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Maintenance Connection and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Maintenance Connection | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Maintenance Connection
- Deep asset hierarchies
- Labour and cost tracking
- Multi-storeroom inventory
- Preventive and predictive
- Compliance reporting
- Enterprise integration
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Maintenance Connection
- Multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registersnot OpenBOM
- Organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulatornot OpenBOM
- Operations replacing an ageing enterprise CMMS rather than papernot OpenBOM
- Estates needing maintenance integrated with ERP and financenot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Maintenance Connection
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Maintenance Connection
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Maintenance Connection
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Maintenance Connection
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Maintenance Connection
- Implementation is a project measured in months, and the cost of that work frequently exceeds the first year of licensing
- Pricing is entirely quote-based with no published entry point, so early comparison is impossible
- The interface reflects its age and is a common objection from technicians used to consumer-grade mobile apps
- Overpowered for single-site operations, where the configuration burden buys capability that will not be used
- Accruent sells a broad portfolio, so the buying process involves more product than a maintenance team asked for
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Maintenance Connection
On request- Maintenance Connection$undefined/year
- Work and asset management
- Multi-site
- Inventory
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Maintenance Connection if
- You need deep asset hierarchies.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want labour and cost tracking.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Maintenance Connection or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Maintenance Connection starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Maintenance Connection or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Maintenance Connection and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Maintenance Connection or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Maintenance Connection runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Maintenance Connection starts at On request.
- What is Maintenance Connection best used for?
- Maintenance Connection is most often used for multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registers, organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulator, operations replacing an ageing enterprise cmms rather than paper, estates needing maintenance integrated with erp and finance. Of those, multi-site manufacturing or healthcare estates with large asset registers and organisations that must evidence a maintenance regime to a regulator are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Maintenance Connection do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Maintenance Connection covers Deep asset hierarchies, Labour and cost tracking, Multi-storeroom inventory, Preventive and predictive. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Maintenance Connection: Who is Maintenance Connection for?
Multi-site organisations with large asset registers and formal maintenance governance. Below that scale, the configuration effort is not repaid.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Maintenance Connection: What does it cost?
Not published. It is quoted, and implementation is a separate line that often exceeds first-year licensing.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Maintenance Connection: How does it differ from MaintainX?
Almost entirely. This is an enterprise system configured to enforce an existing process; MaintainX is a mobile app a team adopts in a day. They rarely appear on the same shortlist honestly.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Maintenance Connection: Is it good for regulated industries?
That is its strongest case. Audit trails, evidence of preventive regimes and multi-site consistency are what it is built to produce.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Maintenance Connection: What is the biggest risk in adopting it?
Under-resourcing implementation. A partially configured enterprise CMMS is worse than a well-run simple one, and this is the most common way these projects disappoint.
Related pages
More on Maintenance Connection
Other head to heads
- Maintenance Connection vs eMaint
- Maintenance Connection vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Maintenance Connection vs Hippo CMMS
- Maintenance Connection vs Litmus Edge
- Maintenance Connection vs Aras Innovator
- Maintenance Connection vs Fusion 360
- Maintenance Connection vs Ignition
- Maintenance Connection vs SolidWorks
- Maintenance Connection vs TrakSYS
- Maintenance Connection vs AVEVA System Platform
- Maintenance Connection vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Maintenance Connection vs Materialise Magics
- Maintenance Connection vs Oden Technologies
- Maintenance Connection vs Oqton
- Maintenance Connection vs Paperless Parts
- Maintenance Connection vs Petasense
- Maintenance Connection vs Poseidon Systems
- Maintenance Connection vs Duro PLM
- Maintenance Connection vs PTC Windchill
- Maintenance Connection vs Propel
- Maintenance Connection vs Seeq
- Maintenance Connection vs AMFG
- Maintenance Connection vs Authentise
- Maintenance Connection vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Maintenance Connection vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Maintenance Connection vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs eMaint
- OpenBOM vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- OpenBOM vs Hippo CMMS
- OpenBOM vs Litmus Edge
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs TrakSYS
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Oqton
- OpenBOM vs Paperless Parts
- OpenBOM vs Petasense
- OpenBOM vs Poseidon Systems
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
