Manufacturing · head to head
OpenBOM vs Paperless Parts

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paperless Parts
Manufacturing
Quoting and estimating software for job shops, with geometry analysis and ITAR-aware handling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.; Paperless Parts no pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- They diverge on capability: OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which OpenBOM and Paperless Parts actually diverge.
| Attribute | OpenBOM | Paperless Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per month | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, API | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
Only in Paperless Parts
- Geometry analysis
- Costing rules
- Customer portal
- Quote revisions
- ITAR-aware handling
- ERP hand-off
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Paperless Parts
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Paperless Parts
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Paperless Parts
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Paperless Parts
Paperless Parts
- A CNC machine shop losing RFQs because quotes take three days to return by emailnot OpenBOM
- A defence supplier that must process controlled RFQ files without exposing them to a generic cloud toolnot OpenBOM
- A fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them upnot OpenBOM
- A contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselvesnot OpenBOM
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Paperless Parts
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- The quality of automated quotes depends on costing rules the shop must write, which takes an experienced estimator out of production for weeks before the system is useful.
- ERP and shop system integration is gated to higher tiers, so a small shop on the entry plan is still retyping won quotes into its job system.
- Geometry analysis handles prismatic machined and sheet metal parts well but struggles with complex organic surfaces, weldments and assemblies, which still need manual estimating.
- Once costing logic and quote history live in the platform, moving to another system means rebuilding the rules from scratch, which is a strong practical lock-in beyond the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Paperless Parts
On request- Basic$undefined/year
- Quoting and geometry analysis
- Customer portal
- For small job shops and contract manufacturers
- Pro$undefined/year
- Integrations with ERP and shop systems
- Deeper costing configuration
- For mid-sized manufacturers
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Controlled data handling for defence and aerospace
- Multi-site and multi-process support
- Priority support and dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Choose Paperless Parts if
- You need geometry analysis.
- You also want costing rules.
Questions people ask
- Is OpenBOM or Paperless Parts better?
- Neither clearly leads. OpenBOM starts at Free and Paperless Parts at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, OpenBOM or Paperless Parts?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for OpenBOM and On request for Paperless Parts.
- Does OpenBOM or Paperless Parts run on more platforms?
- OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API. Paperless Parts runs on Web.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paperless Parts starts at On request.
- What is OpenBOM best used for?
- OpenBOM is most often used for a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run, a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them, an electronics team pulling boms straight out of altium and mechanical cad instead of retyping them, a small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a plm project. Of those, a hardware startup replacing a shared bom spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing run and a contract manufacturer sharing structured boms with customers who should see but not edit them are not what Paperless Parts is typically brought in for.
- What can OpenBOM do that Paperless Parts cannot?
- OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management. Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, Costing rules, Customer portal, Quote revisions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Paperless Parts: How much does Paperless Parts cost?
It does not publish pricing. Expect a tiered annual subscription plus a separately quoted implementation and data migration.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Paperless Parts: Does it quote automatically without setup?
No. It applies your costing rules to analysed geometry, and those rules have to be built with your estimator during implementation.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Paperless Parts: Can it handle ITAR-controlled RFQs?
It markets controlled data handling for defence and aerospace work, which is a main reason regulated shops choose it over generic quoting tools.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Paperless Parts: Will it integrate with my shop ERP?
Integrations exist but are gated to the higher tiers, so confirm your ERP is covered at the tier you are quoted.
Related pages
More on Paperless Parts
Other head to heads
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Fulcrum
- OpenBOM vs JobBOSS²
- OpenBOM vs Xometry
- OpenBOM vs Protolabs
- OpenBOM vs 3YOURMIND
- OpenBOM vs Prodsmart
- OpenBOM vs Erbessd Instruments
- OpenBOM vs GENESIS Version 11
- OpenBOM vs GrabCAD Print
- OpenBOM vs Guidewheel
- OpenBOM vs Kepware Server
- OpenBOM vs Litmus Edge
- Paperless Parts vs Fusion 360
- Paperless Parts vs Aras Innovator
- Paperless Parts vs Duro PLM
- Paperless Parts vs PTC Windchill
- Paperless Parts vs Propel
- Paperless Parts vs Materialise Magics
- Paperless Parts vs Ignition
- Paperless Parts vs Seeq
- Paperless Parts vs SolidWorks
- Paperless Parts vs AVEVA System Platform
- Paperless Parts vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Paperless Parts vs AMFG
- Paperless Parts vs Authentise
- Paperless Parts vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Paperless Parts vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Paperless Parts vs Arena PLM
- Paperless Parts vs Fulcrum
- Paperless Parts vs JobBOSS²
- Paperless Parts vs Xometry
- Paperless Parts vs Protolabs
- Paperless Parts vs 3YOURMIND
- Paperless Parts vs Prodsmart
- Paperless Parts vs Erbessd Instruments
- Paperless Parts vs GENESIS Version 11
- Paperless Parts vs GrabCAD Print
- Paperless Parts vs Guidewheel
- Paperless Parts vs Kepware Server
- Paperless Parts vs Litmus Edge
