Manufacturing · head to head
Guidewheel vs OpenBOM

Guidewheel
Manufacturing
Machine monitoring from a clamp on the power cord, so equipment age and protocol stop mattering
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

OpenBOM
Manufacturing
Cloud bill of materials and part catalogue management priced per seat, with free read-only users
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only OpenBOM has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Guidewheel current draw shows that a machine is consuming power, not that it is producing good parts, so scrap, rework and quality still require operator entry or additional sensors and the OEE quality factor is not measured automatically.; OpenBOM pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- They diverge on capability: Guidewheel covers Clamp on current sensing, OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Guidewheel and OpenBOM actually diverge.
| Attribute | Guidewheel | OpenBOM |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | On request | Free |
| Pricing model | quote | Per user per month |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Web, iOS, Android | Web, Windows, macOS, API |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Guidewheel
- Clamp on current sensing
- Automatic uptime and downtime
- Downtime categorisation
- Real time alerting
- Shift and OEE reporting
- Energy visibility
Only in OpenBOM
- Multi-level BOMs
- Part catalogue
- CAD add-ins
- Change management
- Free read-only users
- REST API
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Guidewheel
- A plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can readnot OpenBOM
- A mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocolnot OpenBOM
- A manufacturer that needs evidence of real capacity before agreeing to buy another machinenot OpenBOM
- A plant wanting immediate notification when an unattended overnight process stopsnot OpenBOM
OpenBOM
- A hardware startup replacing a shared BOM spreadsheet before its first contract manufacturing runnot Guidewheel
- A contract manufacturer sharing structured BOMs with customers who should see but not edit themnot Guidewheel
- An electronics team pulling BOMs straight out of Altium and mechanical CAD instead of retyping themnot Guidewheel
- A small manufacturer that needs part numbering and revision discipline but cannot fund a PLM projectnot Guidewheel
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Guidewheel
- Current draw shows that a machine is consuming power, not that it is producing good parts, so scrap, rework and quality still require operator entry or additional sensors and the OEE quality factor is not measured automatically.
- Cycle counting depends on a distinct load signature for each cycle, so machines with flat continuous draw such as ovens, some extruders and continuous mixers give poor or unusable part counts.
- Installation involves fitting a clamp around a live power conductor inside or near an electrical panel, which in many plants requires a qualified electrician and a scheduled shutdown rather than a plug in setup.
- It is monitoring, not execution, so there is no routing, scheduling, work order or traceability capability and it must sit alongside an ERP or MES rather than replacing either.
- Pricing is per monitored machine, so a plant with two hundred small machines faces a bill proportional to machine count rather than to plant size, and the economics work better on fewer larger assets.
OpenBOM
- Pricing has three axes, editing seats plus data record count plus per-seat CAD add-ins at $25 to $45 each, so the real annual cost is well above the advertised per-seat figure.
- Paying yearly nearly halves the seat price, from $55 to $30 and $165 to $90, so monthly billing carries an unusually heavy penalty for teams that want flexibility.
- Change management, revision control and CAD file management are absent from the entry Team plan, so the cheapest tier is a catalogue rather than a working PLM.
- It lacks the approval workflows, effectivity dating and audit depth that regulated medical and aerospace suppliers need, so companies pursuing ISO 13485 or AS9100 typically migrate away.
- Record count is metered separately and a large imported part library can push a small team into a higher data tier without adding a single user.
Pricing, plan by plan
Guidewheel
On request- Guidewheel$undefined/year
- Per machine monitoring hardware and platform access
- Downtime and OEE reporting
- Alerting and energy visibility
OpenBOM
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 2,000 data records
- Basic BOM and catalogue management
- Non-commercial and educational use
- Professional Team$55/month
- $30 per seat per month billed yearly
- BOM management, part catalogue, inventory
- RFQ and purchase orders
- Company$165/month
- $90 per seat per month billed yearly
- Everything in Team
- CAD file management and revision control
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Single sign-on
- Custom integrations
- Private or custom hosting
Which should you pick?
Choose Guidewheel if
- You need clamp on current sensing.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want automatic uptime and downtime.
Choose OpenBOM if
- You need multi-level boms.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- You also want part catalogue.
Questions people ask
- Is Guidewheel or OpenBOM better?
- Neither clearly leads. Guidewheel starts at On request and OpenBOM at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Guidewheel or OpenBOM?
- OpenBOM has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at On request for Guidewheel and Free for OpenBOM.
- Does Guidewheel or OpenBOM run on more platforms?
- Guidewheel runs on Web, iOS, Android. OpenBOM runs on Web, Windows, macOS, API.
- Can I use OpenBOM for free?
- Yes. OpenBOM has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Guidewheel starts at On request.
- What is Guidewheel best used for?
- Guidewheel is most often used for a plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can read, a mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocol, a manufacturer that needs evidence of real capacity before agreeing to buy another machine, a plant wanting immediate notification when an unattended overnight process stops. Of those, a plant running equipment built in the 1980s and 1990s that no controller based monitoring product can read and a mixed floor of presses, ovens, compressors and fabrication equipment from many manufacturers with no common protocol are not what OpenBOM is typically brought in for.
- What can Guidewheel do that OpenBOM cannot?
- Guidewheel covers Clamp on current sensing, Automatic uptime and downtime, Downtime categorisation, Real time alerting. OpenBOM covers Multi-level BOMs, Part catalogue, CAD add-ins, Change management.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Guidewheel: Does it work on machines with no controller or network port?
Yes. That is the reason it exists. It measures the power cable, so machine age and protocol are irrelevant.
OpenBOM: Is OpenBOM free?
There is a genuine free tier limited to 2,000 data records and aimed at non-commercial and educational use. Commercial teams start at $30 per seat per month billed yearly.
Guidewheel: Will it count parts?
Sometimes. It works where each cycle produces a distinct electrical signature and does not work on continuous draw equipment.
OpenBOM: Do I pay for people who only look at BOMs?
No. Read-only users are unlimited and free on every paid plan, which is the main reason the total cost undercuts seat-for-seat PLM tools.
Guidewheel: Do I need IT involvement?
Less than with controller based monitoring, but you do need electrical work to fit the sensors and a path for the gateway to reach the internet.
OpenBOM: Are the CAD add-ins included?
No. They are $25 per seat per month billed yearly, $45 monthly, and require an active Team or Company subscription.
Guidewheel: Is it an MES?
No. It monitors equipment. Work orders, routings and traceability need a separate system.
OpenBOM: Can OpenBOM replace a full PLM?
For a startup, usually yes. For regulated manufacturing needing controlled workflows and full audit trails, no.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Guidewheel vs TrakSYS
- Guidewheel vs Tulip
- Guidewheel vs MachineMetrics
- Guidewheel vs Flow Software
- Guidewheel vs Sight Machine
- Guidewheel vs QAD Redzone
- Guidewheel vs Kepware Server
- Guidewheel vs Prodsmart
- Guidewheel vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Augury
- Guidewheel vs KCF Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Oden Technologies
- Guidewheel vs Hippo CMMS
- Guidewheel vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Guidewheel vs 3YOURMIND
- Guidewheel vs AMFG
- Guidewheel vs Aras Innovator
- Guidewheel vs Arena PLM
- Guidewheel vs Fusion 360
- Guidewheel vs Duro PLM
- Guidewheel vs PTC Windchill
- Guidewheel vs Propel
- Guidewheel vs Materialise Magics
- Guidewheel vs Ignition
- Guidewheel vs Seeq
- Guidewheel vs SolidWorks
- Guidewheel vs AVEVA System Platform
- Guidewheel vs Authentise
- Guidewheel vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Guidewheel vs Autodesk Netfabb
- OpenBOM vs TrakSYS
- OpenBOM vs Tulip
- OpenBOM vs MachineMetrics
- OpenBOM vs Flow Software
- OpenBOM vs Sight Machine
- OpenBOM vs QAD Redzone
- OpenBOM vs Kepware Server
- OpenBOM vs Prodsmart
- OpenBOM vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Augury
- OpenBOM vs KCF Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Oden Technologies
- OpenBOM vs Hippo CMMS
- OpenBOM vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- OpenBOM vs 3YOURMIND
- OpenBOM vs AMFG
- OpenBOM vs Aras Innovator
- OpenBOM vs Arena PLM
- OpenBOM vs Fusion 360
- OpenBOM vs Duro PLM
- OpenBOM vs PTC Windchill
- OpenBOM vs Propel
- OpenBOM vs Materialise Magics
- OpenBOM vs Ignition
- OpenBOM vs Seeq
- OpenBOM vs SolidWorks
- OpenBOM vs AVEVA System Platform
- OpenBOM vs Authentise
- OpenBOM vs COPA-DATA zenon
- OpenBOM vs Autodesk Netfabb
