Manufacturing · head to head
GrabCAD Print vs Paperless Parts

GrabCAD Print
Manufacturing
Stratasys print preparation, free in Standard form and 5,000 US dollars a year for Pro
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Paperless Parts
Manufacturing
Quoting and estimating software for job shops, with geometry analysis and ITAR-aware handling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: GrabCAD Print it only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.; Paperless Parts no pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- They diverge on capability: GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GrabCAD Print and Paperless Parts actually diverge.
| Attribute | GrabCAD Print | Paperless Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Free tier | Yes | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop, Cloud | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GrabCAD Print
- Native CAD import
- Multi-technology support
- Tray arrangement and supports
- Nesting (Pro)
- Manufacturing templates (Pro)
- Part labelling (Pro)
- Wall thickness analysis (Pro)
- Cost estimation (Pro)
Only in Paperless Parts
- Geometry analysis
- Costing rules
- Customer portal
- Quote revisions
- ITAR-aware handling
- ERP hand-off
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GrabCAD Print
- A service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per partnot Paperless Parts
- A production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change themnot Paperless Parts
- A design office running FDM and PolyJet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than twonot Paperless Parts
- An engineering team importing native CAD assemblies directly rather than maintaining an STL export workflownot Paperless Parts
Paperless Parts
- A CNC machine shop losing RFQs because quotes take three days to return by emailnot GrabCAD Print
- A defence supplier that must process controlled RFQ files without exposing them to a generic cloud toolnot GrabCAD Print
- A fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them upnot GrabCAD Print
- A contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselvesnot GrabCAD Print
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GrabCAD Print
- It only drives Stratasys printers, so the free Standard tier is a hardware retention mechanism rather than a portable tool, and prepared jobs do not move to another vendor.
- Pro is 5,000 US dollars per named user per year on top of machines that already cost six figures, and there is no floating licence in the standard offer, so shift-based teams buy multiple seats.
- The production features that most justify the spend, nesting and manufacturing templates, are all locked behind Pro, meaning the free tier is not viable for a bureau.
- Stratasys materials are proprietary and cartridge-locked, so the software sits on top of a consumables model where the recurring cost is set entirely by the vendor.
- Support and feature coverage vary by printer family; newer technologies such as SAF and the Neo SLA line have historically lagged FDM in the depth of preparation options exposed.
Paperless Parts
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- The quality of automated quotes depends on costing rules the shop must write, which takes an experienced estimator out of production for weeks before the system is useful.
- ERP and shop system integration is gated to higher tiers, so a small shop on the entry plan is still retyping won quotes into its job system.
- Geometry analysis handles prismatic machined and sheet metal parts well but struggles with complex organic surfaces, weldments and assemblies, which still need manual estimating.
- Once costing logic and quote history live in the platform, moving to another system means rebuilding the rules from scratch, which is a strong practical lock-in beyond the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
GrabCAD Print
Free- GrabCAD Print StandardFree
- Free for Stratasys printer owners
- Native CAD import and tray arrangement
- Support generation and section tools
- GrabCAD Print Pro$5000/year
- Per named user per year
- Automated build nesting
- Manufacturing templates with locked process parameters
Paperless Parts
On request- Basic$undefined/year
- Quoting and geometry analysis
- Customer portal
- For small job shops and contract manufacturers
- Pro$undefined/year
- Integrations with ERP and shop systems
- Deeper costing configuration
- For mid-sized manufacturers
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Controlled data handling for defence and aerospace
- Multi-site and multi-process support
- Priority support and dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose GrabCAD Print if
- You need native cad import.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Windows, Desktop, Cloud.
- You also want multi-technology support.
Choose Paperless Parts if
- You need geometry analysis.
- You also want costing rules.
Questions people ask
- Is GrabCAD Print or Paperless Parts better?
- Neither clearly leads. GrabCAD Print starts at Free and Paperless Parts at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GrabCAD Print or Paperless Parts?
- GrabCAD Print has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at Free for GrabCAD Print and On request for Paperless Parts.
- Does GrabCAD Print or Paperless Parts run on more platforms?
- GrabCAD Print runs on Windows, Desktop, Cloud. Paperless Parts runs on Web.
- Can I use GrabCAD Print for free?
- Yes. GrabCAD Print has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Paperless Parts starts at On request.
- What is GrabCAD Print best used for?
- GrabCAD Print is most often used for a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part, a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them, a design office running fdm and polyjet machines and wanting one preparation tool rather than two, an engineering team importing native cad assemblies directly rather than maintaining an stl export workflow. Of those, a service bureau nesting many small parts into a single tray to raise volume utilisation and reduce cost per part and a production department locking validated process parameters into a template so night shift operators cannot change them are not what Paperless Parts is typically brought in for.
- What can GrabCAD Print do that Paperless Parts cannot?
- GrabCAD Print covers Native CAD import, Multi-technology support, Tray arrangement and supports, Nesting (Pro). Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, Costing rules, Customer portal, Quote revisions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GrabCAD Print: Is GrabCAD Print free?
GrabCAD Print Standard is free for Stratasys printer owners. GrabCAD Print Pro is 5,000 US dollars per user per year.
Paperless Parts: How much does Paperless Parts cost?
It does not publish pricing. Expect a tiered annual subscription plus a separately quoted implementation and data migration.
GrabCAD Print: Can it drive a non-Stratasys printer?
No. It is tied to Stratasys hardware.
Paperless Parts: Does it quote automatically without setup?
No. It applies your costing rules to analysed geometry, and those rules have to be built with your estimator during implementation.
GrabCAD Print: What do I actually get for the Pro fee?
Nesting, manufacturing templates, part labelling, wall thickness analysis and build cost estimation. These are production rather than prototyping features.
Paperless Parts: Can it handle ITAR-controlled RFQs?
It markets controlled data handling for defence and aerospace work, which is a main reason regulated shops choose it over generic quoting tools.
GrabCAD Print: Is there a trial?
Yes, Stratasys has offered 30 and 60 day trials of Pro.
Paperless Parts: Will it integrate with my shop ERP?
Integrations exist but are gated to the higher tiers, so confirm your ERP is covered at the tier you are quoted.
Related pages
More on GrabCAD Print
More on Paperless Parts
Other head to heads
- GrabCAD Print vs Fusion 360
- GrabCAD Print vs Markforged Eiger
- GrabCAD Print vs Materialise Magics
- GrabCAD Print vs Oqton
- GrabCAD Print vs Formlabs PreForm
- GrabCAD Print vs Simplify3D
- GrabCAD Print vs Dyndrite
- GrabCAD Print vs 3YOURMIND
- GrabCAD Print vs Xometry
- GrabCAD Print vs AMFG
- GrabCAD Print vs Authentise
- GrabCAD Print vs KCF Technologies
- GrabCAD Print vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- GrabCAD Print vs LabVIEW
- GrabCAD Print vs SKF Enlight Centre
- GrabCAD Print vs ABB 800xA
- GrabCAD Print vs AVEVA System Platform
- GrabCAD Print vs Autodesk Netfabb
- GrabCAD Print vs Fulcrum
- GrabCAD Print vs JobBOSS²
- GrabCAD Print vs Protolabs
- GrabCAD Print vs Prodsmart
- GrabCAD Print vs SolidWorks
- GrabCAD Print vs Aras Innovator
- GrabCAD Print vs Erbessd Instruments
- GrabCAD Print vs GENESIS Version 11
- GrabCAD Print vs Guidewheel
- GrabCAD Print vs Kepware Server
- GrabCAD Print vs Litmus Edge
- Paperless Parts vs Fusion 360
- Paperless Parts vs Markforged Eiger
- Paperless Parts vs Materialise Magics
- Paperless Parts vs Oqton
- Paperless Parts vs Formlabs PreForm
- Paperless Parts vs Simplify3D
- Paperless Parts vs Dyndrite
- Paperless Parts vs 3YOURMIND
- Paperless Parts vs Xometry
- Paperless Parts vs AMFG
- Paperless Parts vs Authentise
- Paperless Parts vs KCF Technologies
- Paperless Parts vs IBM Maximo Application Suite
- Paperless Parts vs LabVIEW
- Paperless Parts vs SKF Enlight Centre
- Paperless Parts vs ABB 800xA
- Paperless Parts vs AVEVA System Platform
- Paperless Parts vs Autodesk Netfabb
- Paperless Parts vs Fulcrum
- Paperless Parts vs JobBOSS²
- Paperless Parts vs Protolabs
- Paperless Parts vs Prodsmart
- Paperless Parts vs SolidWorks
- Paperless Parts vs Aras Innovator
- Paperless Parts vs Erbessd Instruments
- Paperless Parts vs GENESIS Version 11
- Paperless Parts vs Guidewheel
- Paperless Parts vs Kepware Server
- Paperless Parts vs Litmus Edge
