Manufacturing · head to head
GENESIS Version 11 vs Paperless Parts

GENESIS Version 11
Manufacturing
Iconics SCADA and visualisation under Mitsubishi Electric, now sold with unlimited tag licensing
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -

Paperless Parts
Manufacturing
Quoting and estimating software for job shops, with geometry analysis and ITAR-aware handling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: GENESIS Version 11 the name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.; Paperless Parts no pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- They diverge on capability: GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which GENESIS Version 11 and Paperless Parts actually diverge.
| Attribute | GENESIS Version 11 | Paperless Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | Windows, Web, iOS, Android | Web |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), pricing model (quote), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in GENESIS Version 11
- Unlimited tag licensing
- GraphWorX
- Hyper Historian
- AnalytiX
- Web and mobile clients
- BACnet and building protocols
- Alarm and notification
- Energy AnalytiX
Only in Paperless Parts
- Geometry analysis
- Costing rules
- Customer portal
- Quote revisions
- ITAR-aware handling
- ERP hand-off
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
GENESIS Version 11
- A university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansionnot Paperless Parts
- A data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3D floor model rather than a line diagramnot Paperless Parts
- A water utility wanting pump station status on a GIS map alongside historised flow and pressure datanot Paperless Parts
- A Mitsubishi Electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllersnot Paperless Parts
Paperless Parts
- A CNC machine shop losing RFQs because quotes take three days to return by emailnot GENESIS Version 11
- A defence supplier that must process controlled RFQ files without exposing them to a generic cloud toolnot GENESIS Version 11
- A fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them upnot GENESIS Version 11
- A contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselvesnot GENESIS Version 11
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
GENESIS Version 11
- The name has changed twice, from GENESIS64 to GENESIS Version 11 with an Iconics-to-Mitsubishi ownership shift, so documentation, forum answers and integrator experience are split across three product identities.
- Unlimited licensing sets a high floor: a small site with a few hundred points pays for capacity it cannot use, and tag-priced competitors remain cheaper below a few thousand points.
- It is a Windows and Microsoft-stack product, depending on SQL Server and Windows services, so Linux-first or containerised deployment strategies do not apply to it.
- Mitsubishi Electric now owns it outright, and roadmap priorities follow that group’s factory automation strategy rather than the independent building-automation direction Iconics previously set.
- The 3D and GIS visualisation that distinguishes it takes real modelling effort to populate, and estates that skip that work end up with an expensive licence driving conventional 2D screens.
Paperless Parts
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- The quality of automated quotes depends on costing rules the shop must write, which takes an experienced estimator out of production for weeks before the system is useful.
- ERP and shop system integration is gated to higher tiers, so a small shop on the entry plan is still retyping won quotes into its job system.
- Geometry analysis handles prismatic machined and sheet metal parts well but struggles with complex organic surfaces, weldments and assemblies, which still need manual estimating.
- Once costing logic and quote history live in the platform, moving to another system means rebuilding the rules from scratch, which is a strong practical lock-in beyond the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
GENESIS Version 11
On request- GENESIS Version 11$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags, users and connected devices within a licence
- Licensed by product module rather than by point count
- Sold and configured through Mitsubishi Electric and Iconics system integrators
Paperless Parts
On request- Basic$undefined/year
- Quoting and geometry analysis
- Customer portal
- For small job shops and contract manufacturers
- Pro$undefined/year
- Integrations with ERP and shop systems
- Deeper costing configuration
- For mid-sized manufacturers
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Controlled data handling for defence and aerospace
- Multi-site and multi-process support
- Priority support and dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose GENESIS Version 11 if
- You need unlimited tag licensing.
- You work on Windows, Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want graphworx.
Choose Paperless Parts if
- You need geometry analysis.
- You also want costing rules.
Questions people ask
- Is GENESIS Version 11 or Paperless Parts better?
- Neither clearly leads. GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Paperless Parts at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, GENESIS Version 11 or Paperless Parts?
- GENESIS Version 11 starts at On request and Paperless Parts at On request.
- Does GENESIS Version 11 or Paperless Parts run on more platforms?
- GENESIS Version 11 runs on Windows, Web, iOS, Android. Paperless Parts runs on Web.
- What is GENESIS Version 11 best used for?
- GENESIS Version 11 is most often used for a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion, a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram, a water utility wanting pump station status on a gis map alongside historised flow and pressure data, a mitsubishi electric factory automation site wanting supervisory visualisation from the same vendor as the controllers. Of those, a university or hospital estate adding buildings every year that no longer wants a licence negotiation for each expansion and a data centre operator needing power and cooling status overlaid on a 3d floor model rather than a line diagram are not what Paperless Parts is typically brought in for.
- What can GENESIS Version 11 do that Paperless Parts cannot?
- GENESIS Version 11 covers Unlimited tag licensing, GraphWorX, Hyper Historian, AnalytiX. Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, Costing rules, Customer portal, Quote revisions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
GENESIS Version 11: Is GENESIS64 discontinued?
It has been superseded. GENESIS Version 11 is the current release and the name GENESIS64 is retired.
Paperless Parts: How much does Paperless Parts cost?
It does not publish pricing. Expect a tiered annual subscription plus a separately quoted implementation and data migration.
GENESIS Version 11: Does version 11 really have no tag limits?
Yes, tag, user and device counting was removed in version 11. Licensing is by module instead.
Paperless Parts: Does it quote automatically without setup?
No. It applies your costing rules to analysed geometry, and those rules have to be built with your estimator during implementation.
GENESIS Version 11: Who owns Iconics now?
Mitsubishi Electric, which took full ownership. Iconics continues to operate under its own name from Massachusetts.
Paperless Parts: Can it handle ITAR-controlled RFQs?
It markets controlled data handling for defence and aerospace work, which is a main reason regulated shops choose it over generic quoting tools.
GENESIS Version 11: Can it act as a building management system on its own?
It is the supervisory and analytics layer. It reads BACnet and building controllers but does not replace field-level plant controllers.
Paperless Parts: Will it integrate with my shop ERP?
Integrations exist but are gated to the higher tiers, so confirm your ERP is covered at the tier you are quoted.
Related pages
More on GENESIS Version 11
More on Paperless Parts
Other head to heads
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Ignition
- GENESIS Version 11 vs AVEVA System Platform
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- GENESIS Version 11 vs COPA-DATA zenon
- GENESIS Version 11 vs ABB 800xA
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- GENESIS Version 11 vs OpenBOM
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Kepware Server
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Markforged Eiger
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Oqton
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Petasense
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Simplify3D
- GENESIS Version 11 vs TrendMiner
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Xometry
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Fulcrum
- GENESIS Version 11 vs AMFG
- GENESIS Version 11 vs JobBOSS²
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Protolabs
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Materialise Magics
- GENESIS Version 11 vs 3YOURMIND
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Prodsmart
- GENESIS Version 11 vs SolidWorks
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Aras Innovator
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Erbessd Instruments
- GENESIS Version 11 vs GrabCAD Print
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Guidewheel
- GENESIS Version 11 vs Litmus Edge
- Paperless Parts vs Ignition
- Paperless Parts vs AVEVA System Platform
- Paperless Parts vs Siemens WinCC Unified
- Paperless Parts vs COPA-DATA zenon
- Paperless Parts vs ABB 800xA
- Paperless Parts vs Yokogawa CENTUM VP
- Paperless Parts vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Paperless Parts vs OpenBOM
- Paperless Parts vs Kepware Server
- Paperless Parts vs Markforged Eiger
- Paperless Parts vs Oqton
- Paperless Parts vs Petasense
- Paperless Parts vs Simplify3D
- Paperless Parts vs TrendMiner
- Paperless Parts vs Waites Sensor Technologies
- Paperless Parts vs Xometry
- Paperless Parts vs Fulcrum
- Paperless Parts vs AMFG
- Paperless Parts vs JobBOSS²
- Paperless Parts vs Protolabs
- Paperless Parts vs Materialise Magics
- Paperless Parts vs 3YOURMIND
- Paperless Parts vs Prodsmart
- Paperless Parts vs SolidWorks
- Paperless Parts vs Aras Innovator
- Paperless Parts vs Erbessd Instruments
- Paperless Parts vs GrabCAD Print
- Paperless Parts vs Guidewheel
- Paperless Parts vs Litmus Edge
