Manufacturing · head to head
Autodesk Netfabb vs Paperless Parts

Autodesk Netfabb
Manufacturing
Additive manufacturing build preparation and simulation, now sold only bundled with Fusion
- From
- $4415/year
- Rated
- -

Paperless Parts
Manufacturing
Quoting and estimating software for job shops, with geometry analysis and ITAR-aware handling
- From
- On request
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Autodesk Netfabb netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.; Paperless Parts no pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- They diverge on capability: Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 31 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Autodesk Netfabb and Paperless Parts actually diverge.
| Attribute | Autodesk Netfabb | Paperless Parts |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4415/year | On request |
| Pricing model | Per user per year | quote |
| Platforms | Windows, Desktop | Web |
Identical on both: free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Manufacturing).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Autodesk Netfabb
- Mesh repair
- Build orientation and nesting
- Support generation
- Build simulation
- Geometry compensation
- Lattice and shell structures
- Machine library
- Fusion bundle
Only in Paperless Parts
- Geometry analysis
- Costing rules
- Customer portal
- Quote revisions
- ITAR-aware handling
- ERP hand-off
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Autodesk Netfabb
- A metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine timenot Paperless Parts
- An aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial buildsnot Paperless Parts
- A production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisationnot Paperless Parts
- An engineering team that already subscribes to Fusion and wants AM preparation without adding a second vendornot Paperless Parts
Paperless Parts
- A CNC machine shop losing RFQs because quotes take three days to return by emailnot Autodesk Netfabb
- A defence supplier that must process controlled RFQ files without exposing them to a generic cloud toolnot Autodesk Netfabb
- A fabricator standardising estimating so quotes do not vary by which estimator picked them upnot Autodesk Netfabb
- A contract manufacturer giving customers a portal to submit parts and receive prices themselvesnot Autodesk Netfabb
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Autodesk Netfabb
- Netfabb Ultimate has been retired outright, with no 2026 release and no renewals, so anyone who bought Ultimate is frozen on the 2025.1 build and must accept the repackaged Netfabb instead.
- Autodesk has ended development of the Selective Space Structures, Optimization Utility and Lattice Topology utilities, which removes capability some customers specifically bought the product for.
- It is now only sold bundled as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb, so a shop that has standardised on other CAD pays for Fusion entitlements it will not use.
- At around 4,415 US dollars per seat per year it is far above slicer-class tools, and the pricing is per named user with no floating option in the standard subscription, which hurts teams where the AM engineer role is shared.
- Machine coverage is broad but not universal, and the newest printers from smaller manufacturers often reach their vendor own preparation software long before a Netfabb profile appears.
Paperless Parts
- No pricing is published at any tier, and the mandatory implementation and data migration are quoted on top of the subscription, so the first-year cost is materially higher than the recurring one.
- The quality of automated quotes depends on costing rules the shop must write, which takes an experienced estimator out of production for weeks before the system is useful.
- ERP and shop system integration is gated to higher tiers, so a small shop on the entry plan is still retyping won quotes into its job system.
- Geometry analysis handles prismatic machined and sheet metal parts well but struggles with complex organic surfaces, weldments and assemblies, which still need manual estimating.
- Once costing logic and quote history live in the platform, moving to another system means rebuilding the rules from scratch, which is a strong practical lock-in beyond the contract term.
Pricing, plan by plan
Autodesk Netfabb
$4415/year- Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb$4415/year
- Single-user subscription
- Netfabb build preparation, formerly Premium
- Selected functionality from the retired Ultimate edition
- Netfabb Simulation$undefined/year
- Metal powder bed build simulation
- Quoted through Autodesk sales, no published price
Paperless Parts
On request- Basic$undefined/year
- Quoting and geometry analysis
- Customer portal
- For small job shops and contract manufacturers
- Pro$undefined/year
- Integrations with ERP and shop systems
- Deeper costing configuration
- For mid-sized manufacturers
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Controlled data handling for defence and aerospace
- Multi-site and multi-process support
- Priority support and dedicated onboarding
Which should you pick?
Choose Autodesk Netfabb if
- You need mesh repair.
- You work on Windows, Desktop.
- You also want build orientation and nesting.
Choose Paperless Parts if
- You need geometry analysis.
- You also want costing rules.
Questions people ask
- Is Autodesk Netfabb or Paperless Parts better?
- Neither clearly leads. Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Paperless Parts at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Autodesk Netfabb or Paperless Parts?
- Autodesk Netfabb starts at $4415/year and Paperless Parts at On request.
- Does Autodesk Netfabb or Paperless Parts run on more platforms?
- Autodesk Netfabb runs on Windows, Desktop. Paperless Parts runs on Web.
- What is Autodesk Netfabb best used for?
- Autodesk Netfabb is most often used for a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time, an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds, a production department nesting hundreds of small parts into a single polymer build to raise volume utilisation, an engineering team that already subscribes to fusion and wants am preparation without adding a second vendor. Of those, a metal additive bureau predicting distortion on a laser powder bed build before committing twenty hours of machine time and an aerospace supplier applying automatic geometry compensation so printed parts land within tolerance without iterative trial builds are not what Paperless Parts is typically brought in for.
- What can Autodesk Netfabb do that Paperless Parts cannot?
- Autodesk Netfabb covers Mesh repair, Build orientation and nesting, Support generation, Build simulation. Paperless Parts covers Geometry analysis, Costing rules, Customer portal, Quote revisions.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Autodesk Netfabb: Is Netfabb discontinued?
No, but Netfabb Ultimate is. There is a 2026 release of Netfabb, sold only as Autodesk Fusion with Netfabb. Ultimate licences cannot be renewed.
Paperless Parts: How much does Paperless Parts cost?
It does not publish pricing. Expect a tiered annual subscription plus a separately quoted implementation and data migration.
Autodesk Netfabb: What does it cost?
The Fusion with Netfabb single-user subscription is listed at roughly 4,415 US dollars a year. Netfabb Simulation is quoted separately.
Paperless Parts: Does it quote automatically without setup?
No. It applies your costing rules to analysed geometry, and those rules have to be built with your estimator during implementation.
Autodesk Netfabb: Is there a perpetual licence?
No. Autodesk sells subscription only across its product range.
Paperless Parts: Can it handle ITAR-controlled RFQs?
It markets controlled data handling for defence and aerospace work, which is a main reason regulated shops choose it over generic quoting tools.
Autodesk Netfabb: Do I need Fusion to use it?
You do not have to use Fusion, but you now pay for it, because the bundle is the only way Netfabb is sold.
Paperless Parts: Will it integrate with my shop ERP?
Integrations exist but are gated to the higher tiers, so confirm your ERP is covered at the tier you are quoted.
Related pages
More on Autodesk Netfabb
More on Paperless Parts
Other head to heads
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Materialise Magics
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Oqton
- Autodesk Netfabb vs GrabCAD Print
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Simplify3D
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Formlabs PreForm
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Markforged Eiger
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Dyndrite
- Autodesk Netfabb vs 3YOURMIND
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AMFG
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Authentise
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Protolabs
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Fictiv
- Autodesk Netfabb vs ABB 800xA
- Autodesk Netfabb vs AVEVA System Platform
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Hippo CMMS
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Fulcrum
- Autodesk Netfabb vs JobBOSS²
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Xometry
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Prodsmart
- Autodesk Netfabb vs SolidWorks
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Aras Innovator
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Erbessd Instruments
- Autodesk Netfabb vs GENESIS Version 11
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Guidewheel
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Kepware Server
- Autodesk Netfabb vs Litmus Edge
- Paperless Parts vs Materialise Magics
- Paperless Parts vs Oqton
- Paperless Parts vs GrabCAD Print
- Paperless Parts vs Simplify3D
- Paperless Parts vs Formlabs PreForm
- Paperless Parts vs Markforged Eiger
- Paperless Parts vs Dyndrite
- Paperless Parts vs 3YOURMIND
- Paperless Parts vs AMFG
- Paperless Parts vs Authentise
- Paperless Parts vs Protolabs
- Paperless Parts vs Fictiv
- Paperless Parts vs ABB 800xA
- Paperless Parts vs AVEVA System Platform
- Paperless Parts vs Hippo CMMS
- Paperless Parts vs Rockwell FactoryTalk
- Paperless Parts vs Fulcrum
- Paperless Parts vs JobBOSS²
- Paperless Parts vs Xometry
- Paperless Parts vs Prodsmart
- Paperless Parts vs SolidWorks
- Paperless Parts vs Aras Innovator
- Paperless Parts vs Erbessd Instruments
- Paperless Parts vs GENESIS Version 11
- Paperless Parts vs Guidewheel
- Paperless Parts vs Kepware Server
- Paperless Parts vs Litmus Edge
