Databases · head to head
QuestDB vs SingleStore

QuestDB
Databases
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

SingleStore
Databases
The real-time distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features; SingleStore high licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- They diverge on capability: QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which QuestDB and SingleStore actually diverge.
| Attribute | QuestDB | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | Unknown |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) | Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed |
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
Only in SingleStore
- Real-time Analytics
- Fast Data Ingest
- In-memory Processing
- Distributed Architecture
- MySQL Compatible
- Columnar Storage
- Vector Search
- Spark
Both cover
- Kafka
- Linux support
- Docker support
- Web support
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot SingleStore
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot SingleStore
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not SingleStore
SingleStore
- Transaction processingnot QuestDB
- Data storagenot QuestDB
- Application backendnot QuestDB
- Reportingnot QuestDB
- Data analyticsnot QuestDB
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
SingleStore
- High licensing costs that increase with data scale and cluster size
- Eventual consistency in replication: secondary replicas may lag during high write loads
- Complex operational setup requiring specialized knowledge for optimization
- Vendor lock-in due to proprietary technology without open-source alternatives
- Disorganized documentation and lack of online training resources
Pricing, plan by plan
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
SingleStore
Free- Free Tier$0.99/month
- Usage-based pricing
- Limited resources
Which should you pick?
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Choose SingleStore if
- You need real-time analytics.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- You also want fast data ingest.
Questions people ask
- Is QuestDB or SingleStore better?
- Neither clearly leads. QuestDB starts at Free and SingleStore at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, QuestDB or SingleStore?
- QuestDB starts at Free and SingleStore at Free.
- Does QuestDB or SingleStore run on more platforms?
- QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP). SingleStore runs on Cloud (SingleStoreDB Cloud), Self-Managed.
- Can I use QuestDB for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is QuestDB best used for?
- QuestDB is most often used for time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds, real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics, applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time sql, cold parquet archive). Of those, time-series analytics ingesting up to 20m rows/second from iot sensors or financial data feeds and real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analytics are not what SingleStore is typically brought in for.
- What can QuestDB do that SingleStore cannot?
- QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization. SingleStore covers Real-time Analytics, Fast Data Ingest, In-memory Processing, Distributed Architecture. Both handle Kafka, Linux support, Docker support, Web support.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
QuestDB: How much does QuestDB Enterprise cost?
QuestDB does not publish specific pricing for the Enterprise tier. Customers must contact QuestDB via their enterprise contact form to receive a custom quote.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore offer a free tier?
Yes, SingleStore offers a free tier starting from $0.99/month with usage-based pricing. The free tier allows developers to evaluate the platform with limited resources before scaling to production workloads.
SourceQuestDB: Does QuestDB offer a free version?
Yes, QuestDB Open Source is completely free and recommended for evaluation, prototyping, and pilot projects. Enterprise features, high availability, security, and dedicated support require the paid Enterprise tier.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore handle both transactional and analytical workloads?
Yes, SingleStore is a hybrid transactional/analytical processing (HTAP) database that combines operational (OLTP) and analytical (OLAP) workloads in a single unified engine, eliminating the need for separate systems.
SourceQuestDB: What deployment options does QuestDB offer?
QuestDB offers open source deployment, Enterprise deployment, and Bring Your Own Cloud (BYOC) deployment. Pricing details for BYOC and Enterprise tiers are not published and require direct contact with sales.
SourceSingleStore: Does SingleStore integrate with Apache Spark?
Yes, SingleStore provides the Spark Connector 3.0 for bidirectional data integration with Apache Spark. The connector supports SQL, Python, Scala, Java, and R for data loading and extraction.
SourceSingleStore: Can SingleStore ingest data from Kafka?
Yes, SingleStore supports high-throughput streaming ingestion from Apache Kafka and other sources, enabling millions of events per second without requiring ETL pipelines or data movement.
SourceSingleStore: Is SingleStore available as cloud or self-managed?
SingleStore offers both deployment options: SingleStoreDB Cloud (managed service) and SingleStore Self-Managed for on-premises or private cloud deployments. The managed service handles infrastructure, scaling, and maintenance automatically.
SourceRelated pages
More on SingleStore
Other head to heads
- QuestDB vs TimescaleDB
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Cockroach Labs
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs Apache Flink
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs OpenSearch
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs NATS
- QuestDB vs Canary Labs
- QuestDB vs Chroma
- QuestDB vs Cloudinary
- QuestDB vs Convex
- QuestDB vs Dgraph
- QuestDB vs Dragonfly
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Elasticsearch
- QuestDB vs TiDB
- QuestDB vs Materialize
- QuestDB vs Estuary
- QuestDB vs Fivetran HVR
- QuestDB vs Nile
- QuestDB vs Ninox
- QuestDB vs Presto
- QuestDB vs Privacera
- QuestDB vs RavenDB
- QuestDB vs Readyset
- QuestDB vs Apache Pinot
- SingleStore vs TimescaleDB
- SingleStore vs PostgreSQL
- SingleStore vs Cockroach Labs
- SingleStore vs Amazon Aurora
- SingleStore vs Airtable
- SingleStore vs Firebolt
- SingleStore vs Apache Flink
- SingleStore vs DuckDB
- SingleStore vs OpenSearch
- SingleStore vs ClickHouse
- SingleStore vs NATS
- SingleStore vs Canary Labs
- SingleStore vs Chroma
- SingleStore vs Cloudinary
- SingleStore vs Convex
- SingleStore vs Dgraph
- SingleStore vs Dragonfly
- SingleStore vs Apache Druid
- SingleStore vs Elasticsearch
- SingleStore vs TiDB
- SingleStore vs Materialize
- SingleStore vs Estuary
- SingleStore vs Fivetran HVR
- SingleStore vs Nile
- SingleStore vs Ninox
- SingleStore vs Presto
- SingleStore vs Privacera
- SingleStore vs RavenDB
- SingleStore vs Readyset
- SingleStore vs Apache Pinot
