Database & Data Management · head to head
Cockroach Labs vs QuestDB

Cockroach Labs
Database & Data Management
The cloud-native distributed SQL database
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

QuestDB
Database & Data Management
Fast open source time-series database for high throughput ingestion
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Cockroach Labs basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only); QuestDB open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- They diverge on capability: Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Cockroach Labs and QuestDB actually diverge.
| Attribute | Cockroach Labs | QuestDB |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | freemium | open-source |
| Platforms | AWS, GCP, Azure | Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP) |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Database & Data Management).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL
- Automatic Sharding
- Multi-region Replication
- Geo-partitioning
- ACID Transactions
- Horizontal Scaling
- Survivability
- PostgreSQL Compatibility
Only in QuestDB
- High Throughput Ingestion
- SQL Support
- Time-series Optimization
- SIMD Vectorization
- Column-oriented Storage
- Built-in Web Console
- InfluxDB Line Protocol
- PostgreSQL
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Cockroach Labs
- Distributed SQL database for scalable applicationsnot QuestDB
- Multi-region deployment and failovernot QuestDB
QuestDB
- Time-series analytics ingesting up to 20M rows/second from IoT sensors or financial data feedsnot Cockroach Labs
- Real-time dashboarding with 32ms time-to-first-row latency for minute-level analyticsnot Cockroach Labs
- Applications requiring multi-tier storage (hot ingest, real-time SQL, cold Parquet archive)not Cockroach Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Cockroach Labs
- Basic and Standard tiers limited to AWS and GCP (select regions only)
- Azure support restricted to Advanced tier only
- Basic tier limited to 50 million RUs and 10 GiB storage per month
- Advanced tier starts at $0.60/hour for 4 vCPUs minimum
- 3 TiB maximum storage on Basic and Standard tiers, 10 TiB per node on Advanced
QuestDB
- Open-source edition lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Enterprise edition pricing not published; requires contacting sales for custom quote
- Ingestion limit of 20M rows/sec platform-dependent; may not scale to extreme throughput requirements
Pricing, plan by plan
Cockroach Labs
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Cockroach Labs review.
QuestDB
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the QuestDB review.
Which should you pick?
Choose Cockroach Labs if
- You need distributed sql.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on AWS, GCP, Azure.
- You also want automatic sharding.
Choose QuestDB if
- You need high throughput ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- You also want sql support.
Questions people ask
- Is Cockroach Labs or QuestDB better?
- Neither clearly leads. Cockroach Labs starts at Free and QuestDB at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Cockroach Labs or QuestDB?
- Cockroach Labs starts at Free and QuestDB at Free.
- Does Cockroach Labs or QuestDB run on more platforms?
- Cockroach Labs runs on AWS, GCP, Azure. QuestDB runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP).
- Can I use Cockroach Labs for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Cockroach Labs best used for?
- Cockroach Labs is most often used for distributed sql database for scalable applications, multi-region deployment and failover. Of those, distributed sql database for scalable applications and multi-region deployment and failover are not what QuestDB is typically brought in for.
- What can Cockroach Labs do that QuestDB cannot?
- Cockroach Labs covers Distributed SQL, Automatic Sharding, Multi-region Replication, Geo-partitioning. QuestDB covers High Throughput Ingestion, SQL Support, Time-series Optimization, SIMD Vectorization.
Related pages
More on Cockroach Labs
Other head to heads
- Cockroach Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Cockroach Labs vs Airtable
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Cockroach Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Cockroach Labs vs PlanetScale
- Cockroach Labs vs Azure SQL
- Cockroach Labs vs ClickHouse
- Cockroach Labs vs Couchbase
- Cockroach Labs vs DuckDB
- Cockroach Labs vs DynamoDB
- Cockroach Labs vs MariaDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Oracle Database
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon RDS
- Cockroach Labs vs Amazon Redshift
- Cockroach Labs vs Apache Druid
- Cockroach Labs vs Cassandra
- Cockroach Labs vs CouchDB
- Cockroach Labs vs Firebolt
- QuestDB vs PostgreSQL
- QuestDB vs Airtable
- QuestDB vs Amazon Aurora
- QuestDB vs Elasticsearch
- QuestDB vs PlanetScale
- QuestDB vs Azure SQL
- QuestDB vs ClickHouse
- QuestDB vs Couchbase
- QuestDB vs DuckDB
- QuestDB vs DynamoDB
- QuestDB vs MariaDB
- QuestDB vs Oracle Database
- QuestDB vs Amazon RDS
- QuestDB vs Amazon Redshift
- QuestDB vs Apache Druid
- QuestDB vs Cassandra
- QuestDB vs CouchDB
- QuestDB vs Firebolt
