Databases · head to head
Apache Druid vs Ninox

Apache Druid
Databases
Real-time analytics database for sub-second OLAP queries
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Apache Druid open-source offering lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 30 August 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Apache Druid and Ninox actually diverge.
| Attribute | Apache Druid | Ninox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | open-source | freemium |
| Platforms | Docker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based) | Web |
| Founded | 1999 | Unknown |
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Apache Druid
- Real-time Ingestion
- Sub-second Queries
- Column-oriented Storage
- Streaming Integration
- Approximate Algorithms
- Flexible Schemas
- Time-based Partitioning
- Kafka
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Apache Druid does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Apache Druid
- Real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sourcesnot Ninox
- Applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows)not Ninox
- Time-series and event analysis at massive scale with columnar storage efficiencynot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Apache Druid
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Apache Druid
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Apache Druid
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Apache Druid
- Open-source offering lacks high-availability, distributed architecture, and enterprise security features
- Requires native integration with Apache Kafka or Amazon Kinesis for real-time ingestion; custom integrations need development
- High-concurrency query support (hundreds of thousands QPS) requires significant cluster infrastructure investment
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Apache Druid
FreeNo published plan breakdown. See the Apache Druid review.
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Apache Druid if
- You need real-time ingestion.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Docker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based).
- You also want sub-second queries.
Questions people ask
- Is Apache Druid or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Apache Druid starts at Free and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Apache Druid or Ninox?
- Apache Druid starts at Free and Ninox at Free.
- Does Apache Druid or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Apache Druid runs on Docker, Kubernetes, Native deployment (Java-based). Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use Apache Druid for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Apache Druid best used for?
- Apache Druid is most often used for real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sources, applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows), time-series and event analysis at massive scale with columnar storage efficiency. Of those, real-time analytics platforms ingesting millions of events per second from streaming sources and applications requiring sub-second queries over high-cardinality datasets (billions to trillions of rows) are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Apache Druid do that Ninox cannot?
- Apache Druid covers Real-time Ingestion, Sub-second Queries, Column-oriented Storage, Streaming Integration.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Apache Druid: Is Apache Druid free to use?
Apache Druid is an open-source project with no licensing fees. It is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, and the Druid name and logo are trademarks of The Apache Software Foundation.
SourceNinox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceApache Druid: Can I use Apache Druid for commercial purposes?
Yes, Apache Druid is open-source software available for commercial use at no cost. The CC BY-SA 4.0 license permits commercial deployment.
SourceNinox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceApache Druid: Where do I find pricing for commercial support or services?
No pricing or support tiers are published on the Apache Druid homepage. For commercial support options, contact the Apache Druid community or consult additional resources beyond the project website.
SourceNinox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceRelated pages
More on Apache Druid
Other head to heads
- Apache Druid vs ClickHouse
- Apache Druid vs SingleStore
- Apache Druid vs StarRocks
- Apache Druid vs Amazon Aurora
- Apache Druid vs Airtable
- Apache Druid vs Cockroach Labs
- Apache Druid vs PostgreSQL
- Apache Druid vs Firebolt
- Apache Druid vs DuckDB
- Apache Druid vs Estuary
- Apache Druid vs TimescaleDB
- Apache Druid vs QuestDB
- Apache Druid vs Solace PubSub+
- Apache Druid vs SQLite
- Apache Druid vs SurrealDB
- Apache Druid vs Teradata
- Apache Druid vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Apache Druid vs Apache Airflow
- Apache Druid vs Knack
- Apache Druid vs FaunaDB
- Apache Druid vs Readyset
- Apache Druid vs Elasticsearch
- Apache Druid vs RabbitMQ
- Apache Druid vs Memcached
- Apache Druid vs MotherDuck
- Apache Druid vs Neo4j
- Apache Druid vs OpenSearch
- Apache Druid vs Qdrant
- Apache Druid vs Cassandra
- Apache Druid vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs ClickHouse
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs StarRocks
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Firebolt
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs Estuary
- Ninox vs TimescaleDB
- Ninox vs QuestDB
- Ninox vs Solace PubSub+
- Ninox vs SQLite
- Ninox vs SurrealDB
- Ninox vs Teradata
- Ninox vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

