Databases · head to head
Canary Labs vs Ninox

Canary Labs
Databases
Industrial process historian with published per-tag pricing and no client licence fees
- From
- $3000/year
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Only Ninox has a free tier, so it costs nothing to try first.
- Each has a real cost: Canary Labs pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.; Ninox free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Canary Labs and Ninox actually diverge.
| Attribute | Canary Labs | Ninox |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $3000/year | Free |
| Pricing model | Per tag band per year | freemium |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Platforms | Windows, Web | Web |
Identical on both: user rating (Not yet rated), category (Databases).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Canary Labs
- Loss-less compression
- Unlimited clients
- Store and forward
- Views service
- Sparkplug B
- Calculation engine
- Axiom
- ODBC and REST
Only in Ninox
Nothing recorded that Canary Labs does not also cover.
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Canary Labs
- A manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a PI System enterprise agreementnot Ninox
- A water utility replacing SCADA-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next SCADA replacementnot Ninox
- An Ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboardsnot Ninox
- A plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an auditnot Ninox
Ninox
- No-code database solutions for small to medium teamsnot Canary Labs
- Workflow automation and process managementnot Canary Labs
- Customer data and project tracking with custom viewsnot Canary Labs
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Canary Labs
- Pricing steps by tag band rather than actual tags, so a site sitting just above a threshold pays the next band in full; growth from 3,400 to 3,600 tags is a licence purchase, not a rounding error.
- CustomerCare at 18 percent of licence cost is effectively mandatory on perpetual licences because lapsing it removes upgrades, so the perpetual option is not really a one-time cost.
- The storage format is proprietary; getting data out at volume means the ODBC connector, an additional 2,500 USD one-time or 1,000 USD a year, or writing against the REST API.
- Canary is a small vendor with a limited partner network outside North America, so support coverage and integrator availability in Europe and Asia are thinner than for AVEVA or Ignition.
- It is a Windows-only server product with no Linux or container deployment, which complicates placing collectors in modern edge estates.
Ninox
- Free plan limited to 5 users and 5,000 records
- API call limits restrict automation on lower tiers (1,000/month free, 10,000/month team)
- Only 7-day history on free plan vs. unlimited on Business
Pricing, plan by plan
Canary Labs
$3000/year- Subscription, 3,500 tags$3000/year
- Unlimited Axiom clients
- Unlimited Excel clients
- Support and upgrades included
- Perpetual, 3,500 tags$8730/one-time
- 7,400 USD licence plus 1,330 USD first-year CustomerCare
- CustomerCare renews at 18 percent of licence cost per year
- Unlimited clients
- Private cloud, 3,500 tags$12320/year
- Hosted by Canary
- 1,500 USD one-time setup fee per system
- Scales to around 58,684 USD per year at 60,000 tags
- Enterprise unlimited$undefined/year
- Unlimited tags
- Negotiated licensing terms
- Quoted pricing
Ninox
Free- FreeFree
- Up to 5 users
- 100 MB storage
- Up to 5,000 records
- Team$25/month
- 5 GB storage per user
- 50,000 records per user
- 10,000 API calls per user per month
- Business$40/month
- 10 GB storage per user
- 250,000 records per user
- 50,000 API calls per user per month
- Enterprise$null/custom
- Custom pricing available
- Dedicated support
- Custom solutions and governance
Which should you pick?
Choose Canary Labs if
- You need loss-less compression.
- You work on Windows, Web.
- You also want unlimited clients.
Questions people ask
- Is Canary Labs or Ninox better?
- Neither clearly leads. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year and Ninox at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Canary Labs or Ninox?
- Ninox has a free tier; the other does not. Paid plans start at $3000/year for Canary Labs and Free for Ninox.
- Does Canary Labs or Ninox run on more platforms?
- Canary Labs runs on Windows, Web. Ninox runs on Web.
- Can I use Ninox for free?
- Yes. Ninox has a free tier, so you can try it without paying. Canary Labs starts at $3000/year.
- What is Canary Labs best used for?
- Canary Labs is most often used for a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement, a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement, an ignition site that wants long-term storage and trending without paying per-client for dashboards, a plant with regulatory data-retention obligations where swinging-door compression would not survive an audit. Of those, a manufacturer that needs a compliant historian but cannot justify a pi system enterprise agreement and a water utility replacing scada-embedded logging with a historian that survives the next scada replacement are not what Ninox is typically brought in for.
- What can Canary Labs do that Ninox cannot?
- Canary Labs covers Loss-less compression, Unlimited clients, Store and forward, Views service.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Canary Labs: What does Canary cost?
8,730 USD for a 3,500 tag perpetual system including first-year CustomerCare, or 3,000 USD a year on subscription.
Ninox: How much does Ninox cost?
Ninox is free for individuals with up to 5 users. Team plan is 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually), and Business plan is 40 EUR per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise plans have custom pricing.
SourceCanary Labs: Are client licences extra?
No. Unlimited Axiom browser clients and unlimited Excel clients are included on every tier.
Ninox: Is Ninox free?
Yes, Ninox offers a free plan for up to 5 users with 100 MB storage and 5,000 records. No payment required to start, and includes all core views: table, form, chart, kanban, maps, and calendar.
SourceCanary Labs: Is perpetual cheaper than subscription?
Canary states perpetual pays off after roughly three years, and after that you still pay 18 percent CustomerCare annually.
Ninox: What is Ninox Team plan pricing?
The Team plan costs 25 EUR per user per month (billed annually). It includes 5 GB storage per user, 50,000 records, 10,000 API calls per month per user, and 30-day history. Annual billing is required.
SourceCanary Labs: Does it use lossy compression?
No. Canary stores every collected value rather than approximating the trend, which matters for regulated data retention.
Related pages
More on Canary Labs
Other head to heads
- Canary Labs vs VerneMQ
- Canary Labs vs EMQX
- Canary Labs vs TimescaleDB
- Canary Labs vs QuestDB
- Canary Labs vs Solace PubSub+
- Canary Labs vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Canary Labs vs Apache Doris
- Canary Labs vs Convex
- Canary Labs vs Instaclustr
- Canary Labs vs Cockroach Labs
- Canary Labs vs Meilisearch
- Canary Labs vs DuckDB
- Canary Labs vs BigQuery
- Canary Labs vs CosmosDB
- Canary Labs vs DataStax
- Canary Labs vs dbt
- Canary Labs vs FaunaDB
- Canary Labs vs Airtable
- Canary Labs vs PostgreSQL
- Canary Labs vs Amazon Aurora
- Canary Labs vs Apache Airflow
- Canary Labs vs Knack
- Canary Labs vs Readyset
- Canary Labs vs Elasticsearch
- Canary Labs vs RabbitMQ
- Canary Labs vs Memcached
- Canary Labs vs MotherDuck
- Canary Labs vs Neo4j
- Canary Labs vs OpenSearch
- Canary Labs vs Qdrant
- Canary Labs vs SingleStore
- Canary Labs vs Cassandra
- Canary Labs vs Apache Kafka
- Ninox vs VerneMQ
- Ninox vs EMQX
- Ninox vs TimescaleDB
- Ninox vs QuestDB
- Ninox vs Solace PubSub+
- Ninox vs Firebase Realtime Database
- Ninox vs Apache Doris
- Ninox vs Convex
- Ninox vs Instaclustr
- Ninox vs Cockroach Labs
- Ninox vs Meilisearch
- Ninox vs DuckDB
- Ninox vs BigQuery
- Ninox vs CosmosDB
- Ninox vs DataStax
- Ninox vs dbt
- Ninox vs FaunaDB
- Ninox vs Airtable
- Ninox vs PostgreSQL
- Ninox vs Amazon Aurora
- Ninox vs Apache Airflow
- Ninox vs Knack
- Ninox vs Readyset
- Ninox vs Elasticsearch
- Ninox vs RabbitMQ
- Ninox vs Memcached
- Ninox vs MotherDuck
- Ninox vs Neo4j
- Ninox vs OpenSearch
- Ninox vs Qdrant
- Ninox vs SingleStore
- Ninox vs Cassandra
- Ninox vs Apache Kafka

