Maps · head to head
Felt vs Transit

Felt
Maps
Collaborative browser mapping with a free non-commercial tier and annual-only paid contracts
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -

Transit
Maps
Public transit trip planning and real-time arrivals for buses, trains and shared bikes and scooters
- From
- Free
- Rated
- -
The short version
- Each has a real cost: Felt felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process; Transit coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- They diverge on capability: Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Transit covers Real-time arrivals.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which Felt and Transit actually diverge.
Identical on both: starting price (Free), free tier (Yes), user rating (Not yet rated), category (Maps).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in Felt
- Real-time collaboration
- Drag and drop data
- Unlimited viewers
- Field app with offline support
- Dashboards
- Live cloud sources
- API and SDK
Only in Transit
- Real-time arrivals
- Multi-modal trip planning
- Service alerts
- In-app fare payment
- Offline schedules
- GO transit and micromobility layers
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
Felt
- An environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing GIS softwarenot Transit
- A utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking atnot Transit
- A planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncostednot Transit
- A team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a weeknot Transit
Transit
- A commuter in a city with a well-maintained GTFS-realtime feed wanting live bus and train arrivalsnot Felt
- A rider comparing a transit trip against a bike share or scooter leg for the last milenot Felt
- A visitor needing offline-capable static schedules in a city with patchy data coveragenot Felt
- Someone wanting to buy a transit fare inside the same app used to plan the trip, in supported citiesnot Felt
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
Felt
- Felt publishes no prices for Professional or Enterprise, so buyers cannot compare against ArcGIS Online or QGIS with hosting without entering a sales process
- Paid tiers are annual contract only with no monthly option, which excludes consultancies that need a tool for a single short engagement and forces them to the free non-commercial tier they are not licensed to use for client work
- The API, JavaScript SDK and live warehouse connections are enterprise-only, so a mid-sized team that wants programmatic access has to buy the top tier rather than pay for one capability
- Analytical depth is limited: there is no meaningful geoprocessing, topology checking or model building, so Felt sits beside a real GIS rather than replacing one
- The Professional tier caps data processing at 25 GB a month and map views at 100,000 a month, which are easy to exceed with raster imagery or a public-facing map, and the overage terms are not published either
Transit
- Coverage depends entirely on whether the local transit agency publishes a real-time feed, so quality swings sharply between well-funded metro systems and smaller regional operators.
- The company earns its revenue by selling agencies a paid analytics product built from rider trip data, which means the free app functions partly as a data-collection layer for a business customer, not only as a public service.
- In-app fare payment is only available in a limited set of cities, so the headline feature is not something most riders can actually use.
- Static schedule fallback in low-data cities is only as accurate as the agency last published, and service changes can go unreflected for weeks.
- The app has no offline routing without a cached area, so it is not reliable for navigation in areas with poor mobile signal.
Pricing, plan by plan
Felt
Free- PersonalFree
- Free forever for non-commercial mapping
- Map creation, upload and sharing
- Not licensed for commercial use
- Professional$undefined/year
- 10 full-access seats with unlimited viewers
- 25 GB of data processing per month
- 100,000 map views per month
- Enterprise$undefined/year
- Live cloud sources including Postgres, Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks and S3
- REST API and JavaScript SDK
- AI features
Transit
Free- Rider appFree
- Real-time arrivals and trip planning
- No ads shown to riders
- In-app fare purchase where supported
Which should you pick?
Choose Felt if
- You need real-time collaboration.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want drag and drop data.
Choose Transit if
- You need real-time arrivals.
- You want to start without paying.
- You work on iOS, Android, Web.
- You also want multi-modal trip planning.
Questions people ask
- Is Felt or Transit better?
- Neither clearly leads. Felt starts at Free and Transit at Free, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, Felt or Transit?
- Felt starts at Free and Transit at Free.
- Does Felt or Transit run on more platforms?
- Felt runs on Web, iOS, Android. Transit runs on iOS, Android, Web.
- Can I use Felt for free?
- Both have a free tier, so you can try either at no cost before committing.
- What is Felt best used for?
- Felt is most often used for an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software, a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at, a planning department sharing a proposal map with the public where the viewer count is unpredictable and viewer seats would be uncosted, a team of analysts who each hold data in different formats and want one map assembled in an afternoon rather than a week. Of those, an environmental consultancy that needs a client to view and comment on survey results without installing gis software and a utility field crew collecting asset condition offline and syncing to the same map the office is looking at are not what Transit is typically brought in for.
- What can Felt do that Transit cannot?
- Felt covers Real-time collaboration, Drag and drop data, Unlimited viewers, Field app with offline support. Transit covers Real-time arrivals, Multi-modal trip planning, Service alerts, In-app fare payment.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
Felt: What does Felt cost?
Felt does not publish prices for Professional or Enterprise. Personal is free but licensed for non-commercial use only.
Transit: Does Transit cost anything to use?
No. The rider app is free with no subscription and no ads; the company earns money separately by selling agencies a paid data and communication platform.
Felt: Can I pay monthly?
No. Paid plans are annual contracts. There is a 7 day trial of Professional.
Transit: Does it work in every city?
No. Coverage depends on whether the local transit agency publishes a GTFS or GTFS-realtime feed; some smaller markets have static schedules only.
Felt: Do viewers cost anything?
No. Viewer access is unlimited on the paid plans, which is the main reason organisations with large map audiences choose it.
Transit: Can I buy a bus or train ticket in the app?
Only in cities where the local agency has integrated fare payment; elsewhere you still need the agency app or a physical ticket.
Felt: Is there a nonprofit discount?
Yes, 30 per cent for verified United States nonprofits, and free access for verified students and classrooms.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- Felt vs Esri ArcGIS
- Felt vs CARTO
- Felt vs QGIS
- Felt vs Atlas.co
- Felt vs Global Mapper
- Felt vs GRASS GIS
- Felt vs onX Maps
- Felt vs Ride with GPS
- Felt vs SW Maps
- Felt vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Felt vs Kepler.gl
- Felt vs Trailforks
- Felt vs AllTrails
- Felt vs Bing Maps
- Felt vs Cesium ion
- Felt vs Citymapper
- Felt vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Felt vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Felt vs Google Maps
- Felt vs HERE WeGo
- Felt vs MapQuest
- Felt vs Waze
- Felt vs Apple Maps
- Felt vs Gaia GPS
- Felt vs GraphHopper
- Felt vs IndoorAtlas
- Transit vs Esri ArcGIS
- Transit vs CARTO
- Transit vs QGIS
- Transit vs Atlas.co
- Transit vs Global Mapper
- Transit vs GRASS GIS
- Transit vs onX Maps
- Transit vs Ride with GPS
- Transit vs SW Maps
- Transit vs TomTom Developer Portal
- Transit vs Kepler.gl
- Transit vs Trailforks
- Transit vs AllTrails
- Transit vs Bing Maps
- Transit vs Cesium ion
- Transit vs Citymapper
- Transit vs ArcGIS Survey123
- Transit vs ArcGIS Field Maps
- Transit vs Google Maps
- Transit vs HERE WeGo
- Transit vs MapQuest
- Transit vs Waze
- Transit vs Apple Maps
- Transit vs Gaia GPS
- Transit vs GraphHopper
- Transit vs IndoorAtlas
