Government · head to head
MyRec.com vs Shufti Pro

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

Shufti Pro
Cybersecurity
Identity verification and AML screening at the low cost end of the market
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.; Shufti Pro rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- They diverge on capability: MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Shufti Pro covers Document verification.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MyRec.com and Shufti Pro actually diverge.
| Attribute | MyRec.com | Shufti Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per year by department annual revenue | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
Only in Shufti Pro
- Document verification
- Facial biometrics
- AML screening
- KYB verification
- Address verification
- Age verification
- Pay as you go option
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot Shufti Pro
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot Shufti Pro
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot Shufti Pro
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot Shufti Pro
Shufti Pro
- A crypto exchange onboarding users in markets where premium vendors have poor document coveragenot MyRec.com
- A gambling operator needing age assurance at high volume where per-check cost dominates the unit economicsnot MyRec.com
- A gig economy platform verifying couriers whose documents are photographed on low end phonesnot MyRec.com
- A startup that needs verification without signing an annual volume commitment before it knows its volumenot MyRec.com
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
Shufti Pro
- Rates are not published despite the pay as you go framing, so the cost advantage over premium vendors has to be established through a quote rather than a price list.
- Accuracy on difficult document types trails the premium vendors, and the saving per check is often consumed by the manual review headcount handling the additional referrals.
- The enterprise assurance profile is thinner than that of larger competitors, so regulated bank procurement teams frequently rule it out at the vendor risk stage rather than on capability.
- Support responsiveness scales with contract size, and pay as you go customers have limited recourse when a document type suddenly starts failing in one market.
- Country coverage is broad but uneven in depth, meaning the same product can perform very differently across two markets you are launching in simultaneously.
Pricing, plan by plan
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
Shufti Pro
On request- Pay as you go$undefined/month
- Consumption billing with no annual commitment
- Rate quoted by sales, not published
- Resubmission sessions stated as not billable
- Monthly commitment$undefined/month
- Lower per-verification rate against a volume commitment
- AML screening and KYB priced as add-ons
- Free trial available before contracting
Which should you pick?
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Choose Shufti Pro if
- You need document verification.
- You work on Web, iOS, Android.
- You also want facial biometrics.
Questions people ask
- Is MyRec.com or Shufti Pro better?
- Neither clearly leads. MyRec.com starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MyRec.com or Shufti Pro?
- MyRec.com starts at On request and Shufti Pro at On request.
- Does MyRec.com or Shufti Pro run on more platforms?
- MyRec.com runs on Web. Shufti Pro runs on Web, iOS, Android.
- What is MyRec.com best used for?
- MyRec.com is most often used for a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet, a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate, replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsell, a department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suite. Of those, a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet and a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate are not what Shufti Pro is typically brought in for.
- What can MyRec.com do that Shufti Pro cannot?
- MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale. Shufti Pro covers Document verification, Facial biometrics, AML screening, KYB verification.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
Shufti Pro: Are failed attempts charged?
Shufti states that resubmission sessions are not charged and that billing follows successful verification attempts. Get that written into the contract, because it materially changes total cost.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
Shufti Pro: Is there a published price?
No. Plan structures are published but rates are quoted. Third party estimates put effective cost well below premium vendors.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
Shufti Pro: Can we start without a commitment?
Yes. A pay as you go option exists, which is unusual in this category and useful for early stage volume.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Related pages
Other head to heads
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Sumsub
- MyRec.com vs Jumio
- MyRec.com vs Veriff
- MyRec.com vs iDenfy
- MyRec.com vs Socure
- MyRec.com vs IDnow
- MyRec.com vs Trulioo
- MyRec.com vs Yoti
- MyRec.com vs Quantexa
- MyRec.com vs Fenergo
- MyRec.com vs NICE Actimize
- MyRec.com vs Signicat
- MyRec.com vs Keeper Password Manager
- MyRec.com vs Keygen
- MyRec.com vs KnowBe4
- MyRec.com vs Legit Security
- MyRec.com vs LogRhythm SIEM
- MyRec.com vs Metasploit
- Shufti Pro vs CivicPlus
- Shufti Pro vs OpenGov
- Shufti Pro vs RecDesk
- Shufti Pro vs Euna Solutions
- Shufti Pro vs Springbrook Software
- Shufti Pro vs Periscope Holdings
- Shufti Pro vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- Shufti Pro vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- Shufti Pro vs GovPilot
- Shufti Pro vs eCode360
- Shufti Pro vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- Shufti Pro vs IAPro
- Shufti Pro vs iCompass
- Shufti Pro vs Mapbox Government
- Shufti Pro vs Mark43
- Shufti Pro vs MuckRock
- Shufti Pro vs Municode
- Shufti Pro vs Rock Solid
- Shufti Pro vs Sumsub
- Shufti Pro vs Jumio
- Shufti Pro vs Veriff
- Shufti Pro vs iDenfy
- Shufti Pro vs Socure
- Shufti Pro vs IDnow
- Shufti Pro vs Trulioo
- Shufti Pro vs Yoti
- Shufti Pro vs Quantexa
- Shufti Pro vs Fenergo
- Shufti Pro vs NICE Actimize
- Shufti Pro vs Signicat
- Shufti Pro vs Keeper Password Manager
- Shufti Pro vs Keygen
- Shufti Pro vs KnowBe4
- Shufti Pro vs Legit Security
- Shufti Pro vs LogRhythm SIEM
- Shufti Pro vs Metasploit
