Government · head to head
MyRec.com vs NICE Actimize

MyRec.com
Government
Recreation management for small parks departments, priced on your annual revenue with no contract
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No

NICE Actimize
Cybersecurity
Financial crime, risk and compliance suite for regulated institutions
- From
- On request
- Free plan
- No
The short version
- Each has a real cost: MyRec.com the annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.; NICE Actimize modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- They diverge on capability: MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring.
- Prices and features above were last checked on 1 September 2026.
Where they differ
Only the attributes on which MyRec.com and NICE Actimize actually diverge.
| Attribute | MyRec.com | NICE Actimize |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per year by department annual revenue | quote |
| Platforms | Web | Web, Linux, Windows |
| Category | Government | Cybersecurity |
Identical on both: starting price (On request), free tier (No), user rating (Not yet rated).
What each one covers
Drawn from each product's published feature list. An absence here means we hold no record of it - not that the product lacks it.
Only in MyRec.com
- Revenue-based annual fee
- Programme registration
- Facility reservations
- Point of sale
- League scheduling
- Everything included
Only in NICE Actimize
- Suspicious activity monitoring
- Watchlist filtering
- Customer due diligence
- Payment fraud detection
- Markets surveillance
- Case management
- X-Sight marketplace
What people use each for
The jobs each tool is most often brought in to do.
MyRec.com
- A town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheetnot NICE Actimize
- A department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor ratenot NICE Actimize
- Replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsellnot NICE Actimize
- A department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suitenot NICE Actimize
NICE Actimize
- A bank under a regulatory consent order that needs a monitoring system with an audit trail examiners already recognisenot MyRec.com
- A broker dealer required to implement trade surveillance covering both orders and trader communicationsnot MyRec.com
- A regional bank outgrowing spreadsheet-based sanctions screening and needing documented model governancenot MyRec.com
- A payments firm needing real time fraud scoring on faster payments alongside batch AML monitoringnot MyRec.com
Where each one falls short
Documented limitations, not opinions. Every one is a constraint you would hit in normal use.
MyRec.com
- The annual fee scales with department revenue, so a successful department pays more for the same software as its programme income grows.
- It is built for small and mid-sized departments and lacks the permitting, aquatics and multi-facility depth a large city requires.
- Credit card processing is explicitly excluded from the fee, so the total cost depends on a merchant agreement the department must source and negotiate itself.
- Integration surface is thin, with no meaningful connection to municipal ERP or finance systems, meaning revenue reconciliation is a manual export.
- The vendor is small, so there is limited third-party consulting capacity and a narrow bench for support during peak registration periods.
NICE Actimize
- Modules are licensed separately, so a bank that starts with AML and later needs fraud and surveillance faces three negotiations and a bill that compounds rather than a suite price.
- Tuning and model validation are consultant-heavy, and the services spend over a deployment often exceeds the first year licence cost.
- The older on premises deployments carry batch-oriented architecture that makes true real time decisioning harder than in newer cloud native rivals.
- Rule and model changes go through a controlled release process, so a bank reacting to a new fraud typology may wait weeks for a change that a modern platform would ship in days.
- Because it is the incumbent at so many institutions, criminals have a good working understanding of what the standard rule sets detect, and undifferentiated out of the box configurations catch predictable behaviour.
Pricing, plan by plan
MyRec.com
On request- MyRec.com$undefined/year
- Single annual fee calculated from department annual revenue
- Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD per year
- Site build, onboarding and training included
NICE Actimize
On request- NICE Actimize$undefined/year
- Licensed per module, not as one suite
- Scaled by institution asset size or transaction volume
- On premises or Actimize cloud deployment
Which should you pick?
Choose MyRec.com if
- You need revenue-based annual fee.
- You also want programme registration.
Choose NICE Actimize if
- You need suspicious activity monitoring.
- You work on Web, Linux, Windows.
- You also want watchlist filtering.
Questions people ask
- Is MyRec.com or NICE Actimize better?
- Neither clearly leads. MyRec.com starts at On request and NICE Actimize at On request, and user ratings are close enough to be indistinguishable. Choose on capability and platform support.
- Which is cheaper, MyRec.com or NICE Actimize?
- MyRec.com starts at On request and NICE Actimize at On request.
- Does MyRec.com or NICE Actimize run on more platforms?
- MyRec.com runs on Web. NICE Actimize runs on Web, Linux, Windows.
- What is MyRec.com best used for?
- MyRec.com is most often used for a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet, a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate, replacing a system that charges per module, where every new programme type triggered an upsell, a department needing field permits and league scheduling without buying a facilities management suite. Of those, a town recreation department of one or two staff moving off paper registration forms and a shared spreadsheet and a department that wants to choose its own payment processor rather than accept the software vendor rate are not what NICE Actimize is typically brought in for.
- What can MyRec.com do that NICE Actimize cannot?
- MyRec.com covers Revenue-based annual fee, Programme registration, Facility reservations, Point of sale. NICE Actimize covers Suspicious activity monitoring, Watchlist filtering, Customer due diligence, Payment fraud detection.
Answered from the vendors’ own pages
MyRec.com: How is MyRec priced?
A single annual fee calculated from your department annual revenue, using a calculator on the MyRec site. Third parties report entry around 2,850 to 3,445 USD a year.
NICE Actimize: Is Actimize one product?
No. It is a family of separately licensed modules covering AML, fraud, due diligence and surveillance. You buy what you need and each has its own price.
MyRec.com: Is there a setup fee?
No. Site build, onboarding and training are included in the annual fee.
NICE Actimize: Can it run in the cloud?
Yes, Actimize offers cloud deployment, though a large share of the installed base still runs on premises for data residency reasons.
MyRec.com: Are card fees included?
No. Credit card processing is separate and you arrange your own merchant account.
NICE Actimize: Who owns it?
NICE Ltd, an Israeli company listed on Nasdaq. Actimize is its financial crime division.
MyRec.com: Is there a contract?
No long-term contract is required, which is unusual in municipal software.
Related pages
More on NICE Actimize
Other head to heads
- MyRec.com vs CivicPlus
- MyRec.com vs OpenGov
- MyRec.com vs RecDesk
- MyRec.com vs Euna Solutions
- MyRec.com vs Springbrook Software
- MyRec.com vs Periscope Holdings
- MyRec.com vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- MyRec.com vs GovPilot
- MyRec.com vs eCode360
- MyRec.com vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- MyRec.com vs IAPro
- MyRec.com vs iCompass
- MyRec.com vs Mapbox Government
- MyRec.com vs Mark43
- MyRec.com vs MuckRock
- MyRec.com vs Municode
- MyRec.com vs Rock Solid
- MyRec.com vs Silent Eight
- MyRec.com vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- MyRec.com vs Quantexa
- MyRec.com vs Feedzai
- MyRec.com vs Unit21
- MyRec.com vs Fenergo
- MyRec.com vs Sardine
- MyRec.com vs ThetaRay
- MyRec.com vs Transmit Security
- MyRec.com vs Socure
- MyRec.com vs Sumsub
- MyRec.com vs Jumio
- MyRec.com vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- MyRec.com vs Recorded Future
- MyRec.com vs RoboForm
- MyRec.com vs Semperis
- MyRec.com vs SentinelOne
- NICE Actimize vs CivicPlus
- NICE Actimize vs OpenGov
- NICE Actimize vs RecDesk
- NICE Actimize vs Euna Solutions
- NICE Actimize vs Springbrook Software
- NICE Actimize vs Periscope Holdings
- NICE Actimize vs NEXGEN Asset Management
- NICE Actimize vs CentralSquare Asset Management
- NICE Actimize vs GovPilot
- NICE Actimize vs eCode360
- NICE Actimize vs Trimble Unity Maintain
- NICE Actimize vs IAPro
- NICE Actimize vs iCompass
- NICE Actimize vs Mapbox Government
- NICE Actimize vs Mark43
- NICE Actimize vs MuckRock
- NICE Actimize vs Municode
- NICE Actimize vs Rock Solid
- NICE Actimize vs Silent Eight
- NICE Actimize vs Featurespace ARIC Risk Hub
- NICE Actimize vs Quantexa
- NICE Actimize vs Feedzai
- NICE Actimize vs Unit21
- NICE Actimize vs Fenergo
- NICE Actimize vs Sardine
- NICE Actimize vs ThetaRay
- NICE Actimize vs Transmit Security
- NICE Actimize vs Socure
- NICE Actimize vs Sumsub
- NICE Actimize vs Jumio
- NICE Actimize vs Rapid7 InsightVM
- NICE Actimize vs Recorded Future
- NICE Actimize vs RoboForm
- NICE Actimize vs Semperis
- NICE Actimize vs SentinelOne
